Power plants – Internal combustion engine with treatment or handling of... – Methods
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-12
2003-10-07
Denion, Thomas (Department: 3748)
Power plants
Internal combustion engine with treatment or handling of...
Methods
C060S297000, C060S299000, C060S301000, C060S303000, C044S358000, C044S359000, C044S361000, C044S366000, C123S00100A
Reexamination Certificate
active
06629407
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates, generally, to a method and apparatus which protects lean burn catalytic-based emissions control systems. Lean burn emissions systems as used herein broadly includes catalysts and associated equipment which is generally located in the effluent stream of a lean burn combustion system, e.g. in the exhaust or the like. Lean burn combustion systems are combustion systems that operate under lean conditions by design for some portion of the operating time. Examples of lean burn combustion systems include diesel engines, heterogeneously charged direct injection gasoline engines, and other systems that operate under lean conditions for a significant amount of operating time. The exhaust treatment system for these applications operate to reduce exhausts emissions under lean conditions and may well operate under other conditions. The invention contemplates the addition of various compounds to a fuel, for example a low sulfur fuel, or lubricant to protect the emissions systems from poisoning by exhaust byproducts, as well as methods of improving the performance of emissions hardware by protecting emissions systems from poisoning from impurities found in fuel and lubricant sources and increasing the catalyst durability in these systems.
More specifically, the present invention relates to fuel or lubricant compositions containing an organometallic compound which acts as a scavenger to reduce the impact of poisons such as sulfur, phosphorus or lead on catalytic emissions control systems (e.g., a catalyst or trap) used for reducing tailpipe emissions, thereby contributing to lowered emissions characteristics and improved emissions system efficiency and improved emission hardware (e.g., catalyst) durability.
2. Description of the Prior Art
It is well known in the automobile industry to reduce tailpipe emissions by using various strategies. The most common method for reducing emissions from spark ignition engines is by careful control of the air-fuel ratio and ignition timing. For example, retarding ignition timing from the best efficiency setting reduces HC and NO
x
emissions, while excessive retard of ignition increases the output of CO and HC. Increasing engine speed reduces HC emissions, but NO
x
emissions increase with load. Increasing coolant temperature tends to reduce HC emissions, but this results in an increase in NO
x
emissions.
It is also known that treating the effluent stream from a combustion process by exhaust after treatment can lower emissions. The effluent contains a wide variety of chemical species and compounds, some of which may be converted by a catalyst into other compounds or species. For example, it is known to provide exhaust after treatment using a three-way catalyst and a lean NO
x
trap. Other catalytic and non-catalytic methods are also known.
Thermal reactors are noncatalytic devices which rely on homogeneous bulk gas reactions to oxidize CO and HC. However, in thermal reactors, NO
x
is largely unaffected. Reactions are enhanced by increasing exhaust temperature (e.g. by a reduced compression ratio or retarded timing) or by increasing exhaust combustibles (rich mixtures). Typically, temperatures of 1500° F. (800° C.) or more are required for peak efficiency. Usually, the engine is run rich to give 1 percent CO and air is injected into the exhaust. Thermal reactors are seldom used, as the required setting dramatically reduces fuel efficiency.
Catalytic systems are capable of reducing NO
x
as well as oxidizing CO and HC. However, a reducing environment for NO
x
treatment is required which necessitates a richer than chemically correct engine air-fuel ratio. A two-bed converter may be used in which air is injected into the second stage to oxidize CO and HC. While efficient, this procedure results in lower fuel economy.
Single stage, three way catalysts (TWC's) are widely used, but they require extremely precise fuel control to be effective. Only in the close proximity of the stoichiometric ratio is the efficiency high for all three pollutants, excursions to either side of stoichiometric can cause increases in hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide or NOx emissions. Such TWC systems can employ, for example, either a zirconia or titanium oxide exhaust oxygen sensor or other type of exhaust sensor and a feedback electronic controls system to maintain the required air-fuel ratio near stoichiometric.
Catalyst support beds may be pellet or honeycomb (e.g. monolithic). Suitable reducing materials include ruthenium and rhodium, while oxidizing materials include cerium, platinum and palladium.
Diesel systems raise a different set of challenges for emissions control. Strategies for reducing particulate and HC include optimizing fuel injection and air motion, effective fuel atomization at varying loads, control of timing of fuel injection, minimization of parasitic losses in combustion chambers, low sac volume or valve cover orifice nozzles for direct injection, reducing lubrication oil contributions, and rapid engine warm-up.
In terms of after treatment, it is known that diesel engines generally burn lean and the exhaust will therefore usually contain excess oxygen. Thus, NO
x
reduction with conventional three-way catalysts is not feasible. NO
x
is removed from diesel exhaust by either selective catalytic reduction, the use of lean NOx catalysts such as those comprised of zeolitic catalysts or using metals such as iridium, or catalyzed thermal decomposition of NO into O
2
and N
2
.
Diesel particulate traps have been developed which employ ceramic or metal filters. Thermal and catalytic regeneration can burn out the material stored. Particulate standards of 0.2 g/mile may necessitate such traps. Both fuel sulfur and aromatic content contribute to particulate emissions. Catalysts have been developed for diesels that are very effective in oxidizing the organic portion of the particulate.
Improved fuel economy can be obtained by using a lean-burn gasoline engine, for example, a direct injection gasoline engine, however currently NO
x
cannot be reduced effectively from oxidizing exhaust using a typical three-way catalyst because the high levels of oxygen suppress the necessary reducing reactions. Without a NO
x
adsorber or lean NO
x
trap (LNT), the superior fuel economy of the lean-burn gasoline engine cannot be exploited. The function of the LNT is to scavenge the NO
x
from the exhaust, retaining it for reduction at some later time. Periodically, the LNT must be regenerated by reducing the NO
x
. This can be accomplished by operating the engine under rich air-fuel ratios for the purpose of purging the trap. This change in operating conditions can adversely effect fuel economy as well as driveability. These LNT's may also be placed on diesel engines, which also operate in a lean air-fuel mode. As in the lean-burn gasoline engines, the exhaust of both types of engines is net oxidizing and therefore is not conducive to the reducing reactions necessary to remove NO
x
. It is an object of the present invention to improve the storage efficiency and durability of the LNT and to prolong the useful life of the LNT before regeneration is necessary.
It is well known that NO
x
adsorbers are highly vulnerable to deactivation by sulfur (see, for example, M. Guyon et al.,
Impact of Sulfur on NO
x
Trap Catalyst Activity
-
Study of the Regeneration Conditions,
SAE Paper No. 982607 (1998); and P. Eastwood,
Critical Topics in Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment,
Research Studies Press Ltd. (2000) pp.215-218.) and other products resulting from fuel combustion and normal lubricant consumption. It is an object of the present invention to provide fuel or lubricant compositions capable of reducing the adverse impact of sulfur, and other exhaust byproducts, on the emissions system including NO
x
adsorbers and LNTs.
Performance fuels for varied applications and engine requirements are known for controlling combustion chamber and intake valve deposits, cleaning port fuel injectors and carburetors, protecting
Openshaw Martin J.
Roos Joseph W.
Scull Herbert M.
Denion Thomas
Ethyl Corporation
Rainear Dennis H.
Robinson Leah O.
Tran Binh
LandOfFree
Lean burn emissions system protectant composition and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Lean burn emissions system protectant composition and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Lean burn emissions system protectant composition and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3124063