Boring or penetrating the earth – With signaling – indicating – testing or measuring – Measuring or indicating drilling fluid rate of flow
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-26
2004-03-30
Schoeppel, Roger (Department: 3672)
Boring or penetrating the earth
With signaling, indicating, testing or measuring
Measuring or indicating drilling fluid rate of flow
C166S250010, C340S853200
Reexamination Certificate
active
06712160
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to systems, methods, and subassemblies for drilling oil, gas, and analogous wells, and more particularly to downhole failure detection.
Background: Downhole Bit Failure
When drilling a well it is desirable to drill as long as possible without wearing the bit to the point of catastrophic bit failure. Optimum bit use occurs when a bit is worn sufficiently that the useful life of the bit has been expended, but the wear is not so extensive that there is a high likelihood of mechanical failure which might result in leaving a portion of the bit in the well. Poor drilling performance, increased BHA (Bottom Hole Assembly) wear, and more frequent fishing jobs all result from continued drilling with bits which are in the process of mechanical failure. A system capable of detecting the early stages of bit failure, with the additional capability of warning the operator at the surface, would be of great value solving the problem of drilling to the point of catastrophic bit failure.
The innovations in this application provide a reliable, inexpensive means of early detection and operator warning when there is a roller cone drill bit failure. This system is technically and economically suitable for use in low cost rotary land rig drilling operations as well as high-end offshore drilling. The solution is able to detect impending bit failure prior to catastrophic damage to the bit, but well after the majority of the bit life is expended. In addition to failure detection, the innovative system is able to alert the operator at the surface once an impending bit failure is detected.
The problem of downhole bit failure can be broken down into two parts. The first part of the problem is to develop a failure detection method and the second part of the problem is to develop a method to warn the operator at the surface. Several approaches for detecting bit failure have been considered.
It appears that some work has been done on placing sensors directly in the drill bit assembly to monitor the bit condition. There is some merit in placing sensors in the bit assembly, but this methodology also has some distinct disadvantages. The main disadvantage is the necessity of redesigning every bit which will use the method. In addition to being costly, each new bit design will have to accommodate the embedded sensors which might compromise the overall design. A second disadvantage arises from the fact that sensor connections and/or data transmission must be made across the threaded connection on the bit to a data processing or telemetry unit. This is difficult in practice.
Downhole Power
In any system that uses electronic components there must be a power source. In many downhole tools disposable batteries are used to power electronics. Batteries have the desirable characteristics of high power density and ease of use. Batteries that are suitable for high-temperature, downhole use have the undesirable characteristics of high cost and difficulty of disposal. Batteries are often the only solution for powering downhole tools requiring relatively high power levels.
Leadless Sub Assembly
In a preferred embodiment, a drill string has a bottom hole assembly that includes an instrumented sub located above the drill bit. The sub assembly preferably has sensors therein to detect phenomena relating to drill bit condition. (Note that the present innovations can also be applied to other problems besides determining drill bit condition.) In the preferred embodiment, the sub assembly has no electrical communication with the drill bit and no sensors are needed in the drill bit. For example, one embodiment uses vibration detecting sensors to characterize the vibrational frequency of the drilling apparatus. Changes in this vibration, which can indicate drill bit failure, can be detected from the sub assembly without need for sensors or electrical leads to the drill bit.
The disclosed innovations, in various embodiments, provide one or more of at least the following advantages:
no special bit required;
compatibility with bits from any manufacturer;
design-independent prediction of bit failure;
easily updated and improved by running different filter algorithms, or different error-detection criteria in parallel, on real-time or simulated data;
adaptable to varying drilling conditions;
early detection of bit failure reduces fishing; and
early detection of bit failure permits greatly improved failure analysis (since bits can be pulled in time for informative routine analysis, without significant loss of running time) and hence rapid improvements in bit design.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2560328 (1951-07-01), Bielstein
patent: 2582312 (1952-01-01), Del'Homme
patent: 3011566 (1961-12-01), Graham
patent: 3058532 (1962-10-01), Alder
patent: 3062302 (1962-11-01), Toth et al.
patent: 3363702 (1968-01-01), Bielstein
patent: 3578092 (1971-05-01), Tesch et al.
patent: 3581564 (1971-06-01), Young
patent: 3678883 (1972-07-01), Fischer
patent: 3703096 (1972-11-01), Vitter et al.
patent: 3714822 (1973-02-01), Lutz
patent: 3728919 (1973-04-01), Scott
patent: 3774445 (1973-11-01), Rundell et al.
patent: 3782190 (1974-01-01), Pittman
patent: 3818227 (1974-06-01), Fries
patent: 3853087 (1974-12-01), Aldag
patent: 3853184 (1974-12-01), McCullough
patent: 3865736 (1975-02-01), Fries
patent: 3906434 (1975-09-01), Lamel
patent: 3913686 (1975-10-01), Manson
patent: 3970877 (1976-07-01), Russell
patent: 4001773 (1977-01-01), Lamel et al.
patent: 4030558 (1977-06-01), Morris
patent: 4040003 (1977-08-01), Beynet et al.
patent: 4063786 (1977-12-01), Rall
patent: 4074575 (1978-02-01), Bergman et al.
patent: 4114704 (1978-09-01), Maurer et al.
patent: 4148271 (1979-04-01), Majernik
patent: 4150568 (1979-04-01), Berger
patent: 4346591 (1982-08-01), Evans
patent: 4379291 (1983-04-01), Hubbard et al.
patent: 4407017 (1983-09-01), Zhilikov
patent: 4425010 (1984-01-01), Bryant et al.
patent: 4436164 (1984-03-01), Garner
patent: 4441244 (1984-04-01), Cason
patent: 4491738 (1985-01-01), Kamp
patent: 4493042 (1985-01-01), Shima et al.
patent: 4548280 (1985-10-01), Daly et al.
patent: 4562559 (1985-12-01), Sharp et al.
patent: 4610313 (1986-09-01), Daly et al.
patent: 4627276 (1986-12-01), Burgess
patent: 4655300 (1987-04-01), Davis, Jr.
patent: 4659043 (1987-04-01), Gallagher
patent: 4665393 (1987-05-01), Wilder et al.
patent: 4685329 (1987-08-01), Burgess
patent: 4688647 (1987-08-01), Daly
patent: 4721172 (1988-01-01), Brett et al.
patent: 4730681 (1988-03-01), Estes
patent: 4773263 (1988-09-01), Lesage et al.
patent: 4785894 (1988-11-01), Davis et al.
patent: 4785895 (1988-11-01), Davis et al.
patent: 4790190 (1988-12-01), Bambara et al.
patent: 4812826 (1989-03-01), Kaufman et al.
patent: 4818153 (1989-04-01), Strandell et al.
patent: 4821563 (1989-04-01), Maron
patent: 4849741 (1989-07-01), Thomas
patent: 4852399 (1989-08-01), Falconer
patent: 4876886 (1989-10-01), Bible et al.
patent: 4884071 (1989-11-01), Howard
patent: 4903245 (1990-02-01), Close et al.
patent: 4911252 (1990-03-01), Estes
patent: 4926686 (1990-05-01), Fay
patent: 4926950 (1990-05-01), Zijsling
patent: 4928521 (1990-05-01), Jardine
patent: 4958125 (1990-09-01), Jardine et al.
patent: 5001993 (1991-03-01), Gramlow
patent: 5072611 (1991-12-01), Budd et al.
patent: 5138875 (1992-08-01), Booer
patent: 5140311 (1992-08-01), Cook
patent: 5141061 (1992-08-01), Henneuse
patent: 5151882 (1992-09-01), Kingman
patent: 5159577 (1992-10-01), Twist
patent: 5183123 (1993-02-01), White
patent: 5216917 (1993-06-01), Detournay
patent: 5226332 (1993-07-01), Wassell
patent: 5249871 (1993-10-01), LaTorre et al.
patent: 5251144 (1993-10-01), Ramamurthi
patent: 5305836 (1994-04-01), Holbrook et al.
patent: 5321981 (1994-06-01), Macpherson
patent: 5353873 (1994-10-01), Cooke, Jr.
patent: 5372207 (1994-12-01), Naville et al.
patent: 5407265 (1995-04-01), Hamidieh
patent: 5415030 (1995-05-01), Jogi et al.
patent: 5448911 (1995-09-01), Mason
patent: 5602437 (1997-02-01), Shahamat et al.
patent: 5633628 (1997-05-01), Denny et al.
patent: 5677488 (1997-10-01)
De Jesus Orlando
Osborne, Jr. Andrew J.
Schultz Roger L.
Groover Robert O.
Halliburton Energy Service,s Inc.
Schoeppel Roger
LandOfFree
Leadless sub assembly for downhole detection system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Leadless sub assembly for downhole detection system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Leadless sub assembly for downhole detection system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3264181