Latency-reducing bandwidth-prioritization for network...

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer network managing – Network resource allocating

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C718S104000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06968379

ABSTRACT:
Communications bandwidth available to network servers and computers running client processes is allocated among connections available to those devices based on sets of priorities. Those priorities include type of information being retrieved, how fast user connections can receive information, which part of a document is being transmitted, user identity, stored indicia indicating importance of the document and the state of application processes running on said computer. Bandwidth is reallocated on an event driven basis upon arrival of a new request for retrieval, finishing sending information in response to a retrieval request, cancellation of a retrieval request, detection of the inability of a user connection to use all of the bandwidth allocated to it, a change of priority and timeout of a timer.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4481583 (1984-11-01), Mueller
patent: 4642758 (1987-02-01), Teng
patent: 5115430 (1992-05-01), Hahne et al.
patent: 5132966 (1992-07-01), Hayano et al.
patent: 5153877 (1992-10-01), Esaki et al.
patent: 5282202 (1994-01-01), Bernstein et al.
patent: 5315586 (1994-05-01), Charvillat
patent: 5381413 (1995-01-01), Tobagi et al.
patent: 5414697 (1995-05-01), Osaki
patent: 5428778 (1995-06-01), Brookes
patent: 5428789 (1995-06-01), Waldron, III
patent: 5526350 (1996-06-01), Gittins et al.
patent: 5548506 (1996-08-01), Srinivasan
patent: 5581703 (1996-12-01), Baugher et al.
patent: 5596576 (1997-01-01), Milito
patent: 5673253 (1997-09-01), Shaffer
patent: 5724659 (1998-03-01), Daniel et al.
patent: 5731805 (1998-03-01), Tognazzini et al.
patent: 5734909 (1998-03-01), Bennett
patent: 5742594 (1998-04-01), Natarajan
patent: 5802301 (1998-09-01), Dan et al.
patent: 5826031 (1998-10-01), Nielsen
patent: 5838968 (1998-11-01), Culbert
patent: 5870629 (1999-02-01), Borden et al.
patent: 5903735 (1999-05-01), Kidder et al.
patent: 5926481 (1999-07-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5943046 (1999-08-01), Cave et al.
patent: 5983261 (1999-11-01), Riddle
patent: 5987518 (1999-11-01), Gotwald
patent: 6011804 (2000-01-01), Bertin et al.
patent: 6018659 (2000-01-01), Ayyagari et al.
patent: 6023456 (2000-02-01), Chapman et al.
patent: 6038214 (2000-03-01), Shionozaki
patent: 6047322 (2000-04-01), Vaid et al.
patent: 6055577 (2000-04-01), Lee et al.
patent: 6097882 (2000-08-01), Mogul
patent: 6125396 (2000-09-01), Lowe
patent: 6141322 (2000-10-01), Poretsky
patent: 6195362 (2001-02-01), Darcie et al.
patent: 6324184 (2001-11-01), Hou et al.
patent: 6396816 (2002-05-01), Astle et al.
patent: 6578077 (2003-06-01), Rakoshitz et al.
patent: 384339 (1990-08-01), None
patent: 0 632 671 (1995-01-01), None
patent: 0 693 840 (1996-01-01), None
patent: 2 301 260 (1996-11-01), None
patent: WO 95/08793 (1995-03-01), None
Lee et al., “A Bandwidth Reallocation Scheme for Ethernet-based Real-time Communication,” Oct. 27, 1995, Second International Workshop on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 28-33.
Bettati et al., “Dynamic Resource Migration for Multiparty Real-Time Communication,” May 1996, The Tenet Group, University California Berkeley, printed from http://faculty.cs.tamu.edu/bettati/Papers/icdcs96.drm/html/drm.html, pp. 1-15.
Shacham, “Preemption-based Admission Control in Multimedia Multiparty Communications,” Apr. 6, 1995, Fourteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Bringing Information to People, vol. 2, pp. 827-834.
Vaid et al., Provisional U.S. Appl. No. 60/047,752, filed May 27, 1997.
Pappalardo, “ISP Tool Might Make Web Browsing More Painful,” Jun. 2, 1997, Network World, vol. 14, Iss. 22, p. 38.
Herrin et al., “The Benefits of Service Rebalancing,” Apr. 1992, Proceedings, Third Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, 1992, pp. 104-110.
Himonas et al., “A Multiple Access Control Protocol for an Interactive Multimedia Network,” Nov. 22, 1996, Global Telecommunications Conference, 1996, vol. 1, pp. 262-266.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 12, No. 185 (p. 170), May 31, 1988, JP Publication No. 62293310.
H. Shrikumar et al.“Thinternet: Life at the End of a Tether”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, NL, North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, vol. 27, No. 3, p. 375-385, XP004037970, ISSN: 0169-7752.
Ing -Ray Chen et al., “Threshold-Based Admission Control Policies for Multimedia Servers”, Computer Journal, GB, Oxford University Press, Surrey, vol. 39, No. 9, p. 757-766, XP000720396, ISSN: 0010-4620.
Jon C.R, Bennett et al., “WF2Q: Worst-Case Fair Weighted Fair Queueing”, Proceedings of Infocom, US, Los Alamitos, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, vol. Conf. 15, p. 120-128, XP000622302, ISBN: 0-8186-7293-5.
D. N. Kanellopoulos et al., “C-MACSE: A New Connection Establishment Protocol for Multimedia Communications Residing at the OSI Application Layer Adopting a Comprehensive QoS Approach”, NL, Amsterdam, IOS, p. 141-150, XP 000754559, ISBN: 90-5199-290-4.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Latency-reducing bandwidth-prioritization for network... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Latency-reducing bandwidth-prioritization for network..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Latency-reducing bandwidth-prioritization for network... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3502215

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.