Laminated yoke head with a domain control element

Details Laminated yoke head with a domain control element Laminated yoke head with a domain control element

1998-09-16

2001-07-10

Klimowicz, William (Department: 2652)

Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval

Head

Core

Reexamination Certificate

active

06259583

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to an inductive magnetic recording head, and in particular to a head with a laminated yoke equipped with a domain control element for improving the overall performance of the head.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Advances in magnetic storage technology require that data rates and especially data write times be reduced. This means that a typical magnetic storage device employing a read-head to read data from and write data to a magnetic medium, e.g., a disk or a tape, has to improve the efficiency of the head. In particular, the rate at which data is written has to be increased, since write and read data rates are the same.
The head is usually formed from two or more elongated pieces of a suitable ferromagnetic material such as a nickel iron (NiFe) alloy. The poles are joined at one end, called the yoke, and separated by a precisely defined gap at the opposite end called the tip. A coil is wrapped around the poles near the yoke. During operation the head is positioned with the tip adjacent the magnetic medium. Data is written to the magnetic medium by driving magnetic flux into the head by passing a write current through the coil. When reading data, the coil senses magnetic flux from the head by generating a read current. The electromagnetic parameters governing the behavior of such heads dictate that the yoke be wide to increase magnetic flux passing through the coil and that the tip be narrow to accommodate high data track density in the magnetic medium.
At high track densities the magnetic properties of the materials used in the poles become crucial. Specifically, what is required is a pole material exhibiting a high magnetic permeability &mgr; and low magnetic coercivity H
c
. Since
μ
=
4
⁢
π
⁢
 
⁢
M
S
H
k
,
where M
S
is the magnetization at saturation and H
k
is the anisotropy magnetic field, a high &mgr; suggests a choice of H
k
as small as possible. However, it has been shown by Nakamura, et al., IEEE Trans. Mag. 21(5), 1985 that too low an anisotropy results in undesirable magnetic domain patterns in narrow pole tips. However, increasing H
k
to a high value has the adverse effect of decreasing the reproducing sensitivity because of reduced &mgr;.
The prior art suggests that the above problem be solved by using laminated poles which combine beneficial magnetic properties of two materials. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,639,699 Tiemann discloses a thin film structure of permalloy with a high &mgr; and a second magnetic material with low &mgr; and high MS. Lazzari teaches in U.S. Pat. No. 3,867,368 to use an additional decoupling layer between laminations of high &mgr; and low &mgr; materials to eliminate exchange coupling between them. Lazzari et al. further explain in “Integrated Magnetic Recording Heads”, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. MAG-7, No. 1, March 1971 that obtaining single domain behavior in laminated poles is desirable for efficient operation of the read-head.
The problems associated with the use of laminated poles include domain stability, material composition, reduction of eddy currents, proper dimensioning and parametrization of the magnetic properties of the layers (e.g., determination of the easy magnetization or fast axis and minimization of edge domains). These general problems are addressed by Nakanishi in U.S. Pat. No. 5,018,038; Andricacos et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,132,859; Re et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,142,426; Shukovsky et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,157,570; Campbell et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,264,981; Jeffers et al. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,239,435; Ohkubo et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,313,356 and Arimoto et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,098. Additional patents addressing laminated poles include U.S. Pat. No. 4,610,935; U.S. Pat No. 5,108,837; U.S. Pat. No. 5,224,002; U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,099 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,606,478.
Although the teachings of the above references do solve many intervening problems and make laminated poles more efficient, they fall short of presenting a head capable of high speed writing. That is because in most of the yoke the magnetic flux runs substantially parallel to the magnetic lamina, but in the tip, specifically at the gap, the flux is generally perpendicular to the lamina. As a result, there is a magnetomotive force drop across the accumulation of non-magnetic layers which reduces the efficiency of the head. Even when using high &mgr; materials (relative &mgr;=1,000) the effective average permeability perpendicular to the lamina in which a fraction f of total thickness is made of magnetic material will be at maximum at about 1/(1−f). As a result, excessively high write currents are required for such heads.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,590,008 to M. Tanube et al. teaches that the upper pole may include two or more layers and a metal may be placed in the gap between the poles. This arrangement will aid in reducing the write current to some extent. In addition, Harry Gill in “CoHfNb/Al
2
O
3
Laminated Write Pole for an Integrated Spin Valve Giant Magnetoresistive Read Inductive Head”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 4, April 1997 teaches to improve the write efficiency at high frequencies by using a high electrical resistivity, non-laminated write pole made of a Co-based amorphous alloy to further reduce eddy currents.
Unfortunately, a problem not solved by the addition of a non-laminated pole portion at the tip or placement of metal in the gap between poles is the alignment of domain magnetizations at the narrow end of the pole in the tip. Specifically, for efficient operation the domains in the tip should have a tendency to align along the easy or fast axis of the high &mgr; layers. However, edge effects at high frequencies prevent this from happening. Additionally, all prior art laminated heads have at least one non-planar pole for accommodating the coil. This geometry negatively affects the magnetic properties of the head because it interferes with efficient conversion of current to magnetic flux in high &mgr; layers and vice versa.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES
Accordingly, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide a magnetic head with improved writing performance at high operating frequencies and high data densities. In particular, the head of the invention achieves better writing performance by preventing undesirable edge effects from interfering with the writing process.
Another object of the invention is to improve the magnetic properties of the magnetic head by altering the geometry of the head to provide for efficient conversion of current to magnetic flux and vice versa.
Yet another object of the invention is to optimize the number and thickness of laminated non-magnetic layers in the head.
It is also an object of the invention to ensure simple fabrication of magnetic heads exhibiting improved performance.
These and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the detailed description.
SUMMARY
These objects and advantages are attained by a magnetic head which has a pole member, which is preferably planar, and has a yoke and a tip. The tip has a first planar pole P1 and a second planar pole P2 positioned above pole P1. The pole member is built up of two types of layers: a first type of layers with high magnetic permeability &mgr; and low anisotropy H
k
, with the easy axis oriented substantially perpendicular to the flux propagation direction to ensure rapid response, and a second layer type which is non-magnetic. The magnetic head also has a domain control element which is positioned at the tip. The function of the domain control element is to conduct flux between P1 and P2 in a fast, efficient manner. For this purpose, the domain control element has its magnetization (in the absence of current in the head coil) in the vicinity of pole tip P2 aligned along the length of the domain control element, which provides for rapid rotation.
It is preferable that the domain control element be a non-laminated element made of a material with high saturation magnetization M
S
. Suitable materials include alloys such as NiF

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Laminated yoke head with a domain control element does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Laminated yoke head with a domain control element, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Laminated yoke head with a domain control element will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2505235