Ventilation – Electronic cabinet
Reexamination Certificate
2001-03-30
2002-10-22
Joyce, Harold (Department: 3749)
Ventilation
Electronic cabinet
C361S695000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06468150
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to noise reduced computer fan cooling systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Personal computers and generic boxes housing electronic components are conventionally cooled by fans mounted to their back panels that blow air across their respective components and transfer heat through convection.
The design trend towards smaller enclosures packing more computing power in less space has increased the amount of heat generated per unit area and consequently has required more effective and reliable cooling. Failure to provide adequate cooling can result in electronic component or peripheral failure, the loss of valuable computing time, and wasted resources in recovering lost data. It is therefore more cost efficient to provide a given box with the requisite cooling initially than to repair and retrofit. However, it is also important to provide cooling without introducing acoustic noise that could diminish system efficiency. System acoustic noise generally takes two forms: mechanical noise and aerodynamic noise.
Mechanical noise is generated from the vibration of moving parts such as fans and disk drives. Aerodynamic noise is generated from turbulent airflow across and in the vicinity of the fan blades. The design and implementation of grommets or other dampening devices for minimizing mechanical noise is well known in the art. Techniques of minimizing aerodynamic noise are less well known. However, while less well known and less critical than the techniques for minimizing mechanical noise they are still important for in optimizing system efficiency.
In general, aerodynamic noise generated by cooling fans is a function of the type of flow in the region surrounding the fan blades, flow velocity, fan blade shape, number of fan blades and the shape of the duct in which the fan is housed.
Many different approaches have been tried to minimize cooling fan noise. These approaches try to minimize noise contributions by modifying at least one of the aforementioned parameters. However, a first problem known in the art is that changing flow velocity and type of flow can result in less cooling and it would be desirable to change flow characteristics to minimize noise without diminishing cooling capacity.
It is known in the art to provide a grille at an airflow entrance for the fan both for human safety and for minimizing radiated electromagnetic noise. A second problem known in the art is that an airflow grille with grill openings small enough to minimize both radiated electromagnetic noise and human contact with rotating fan blades can decrease the efficiency of the fan. This efficiency decrease can result from at least two factors. (1) The airflow grille produces back-pressure on the fan, so that operation of the fan is strained and the fan can be subject to extra wear. (2) The airflow grille produces turbulence, so that operation of the fan is less efficient and airflow over the systems or equipment is less efficient at cooling.
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a cooling system and a method for operating a cooling system, which has relatively reduced noise and is relatively efficient and inexpensive. This advantage is achieved in an embodiment of the invention in which a laminar flow duct modifies flow characteristics by separating a set of cooling fans from an airflow grille. Thus, back pressure on the fan is reduced and laminar flow through the fan and over the systems or equipment is improved.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a cooling system and a method for operating a cooling system, which has relatively reduced noise and is relatively efficient and inexpensive. A set of cooling fans operates in conjunction with an airflow grille and a laminar flow duct, so as to reduce the amount of aerodynamic noise, and to block dust and other foreign objects. A laminar flow duct separates the cooling fans from the airflow grille, so as to reduce back pressure on the fan and improve laminar flow through the fan and over the systems or equipment. Additionally, the laminar flow duct acts to reduce electromagnetic noise.
In a preferred embodiment, the laminar flow duct defines a Venturi opening, so as to draw airflow into the cooling fans from a region adjacent to the laminar flow duct. The Venturi opening allows the cooling fans to cool a secondary set of systems or equipment, such as a set of disk drives or other equipment that need relatively minimal cooling effect.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3385436 (1968-05-01), Murphy
patent: 3435671 (1969-04-01), Hildt
patent: 3813529 (1974-05-01), Bartlett
patent: 3893024 (1975-07-01), Reins et al.
patent: 4075691 (1978-02-01), Davis et al.
patent: 4075704 (1978-02-01), O'Leary
patent: 4156907 (1979-05-01), Rawlings
patent: 4333144 (1982-06-01), Whiteside
patent: 4351023 (1982-09-01), Richer
patent: 4377843 (1983-03-01), Garringer
patent: 4399503 (1983-08-01), Hawley
patent: 4456957 (1984-06-01), Schieltz
patent: 4459664 (1984-07-01), Pottier
patent: 4488231 (1984-12-01), Yu et al.
patent: 4494188 (1985-01-01), Nakane
patent: 4527232 (1985-07-01), Bechtolsheim
patent: 4550368 (1985-10-01), Bechtolsheim
patent: 4589067 (1986-05-01), Proter et al.
patent: 4620292 (1986-10-01), Hagiwara
patent: 4685125 (1987-08-01), Zave
patent: 4710868 (1987-12-01), Cocke et al.
patent: 4719569 (1988-01-01), Ludemann
patent: 4742447 (1988-05-01), Duvall et al.
patent: 4742450 (1988-05-01), Duvall et al.
patent: 4761737 (1988-08-01), Duvall et al.
patent: 4761785 (1988-08-01), Clark et al.
patent: 4766534 (1988-08-01), DeBenedicts
patent: 4780821 (1988-10-01), Crossley
patent: 4783730 (1988-11-01), Fischer
patent: 4803621 (1989-02-01), Kelly
patent: 4819159 (1989-04-01), Shipley et al.
patent: 4825354 (1989-04-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 4827411 (1989-05-01), Arrowood
patent: 4845609 (1989-07-01), Lighthart et al.
patent: 4875159 (1989-10-01), Cary et al.
patent: 4887204 (1989-12-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 4897781 (1990-01-01), Chang et al.
patent: 4914583 (1990-04-01), Weisshaar
patent: 4937763 (1990-06-01), Mott
patent: 4965772 (1990-10-01), Daniel et al.
patent: 4969118 (1990-11-01), Montoye et al.
patent: 4984272 (1991-01-01), McIlroy et al.
patent: 5001628 (1991-03-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5001712 (1991-03-01), Slpett et al.
patent: 5008786 (1991-04-01), Thatte
patent: 5018144 (1991-05-01), Corr et al.
patent: 5043871 (1991-08-01), Nishigaki
patent: 5043876 (1991-08-01), Terry
patent: 5049873 (1991-09-01), Robins et al.
patent: 5067099 (1991-11-01), McCown et al.
patent: 5107500 (1992-04-01), Wakamoto
patent: 5113442 (1992-05-01), Moir
patent: 5134619 (1992-07-01), Henson et al.
patent: 5144659 (1992-09-01), Jones
patent: 5146588 (1992-09-01), Carter et al.
patent: 5155835 (1992-10-01), Belsan
patent: 5163131 (1992-11-01), Row et al.
patent: 5163148 (1992-11-01), Walls
patent: 5182805 (1993-01-01), Campbell
patent: 5195100 (1993-03-01), Katz et al.
patent: 5202983 (1993-04-01), Orita et al.
patent: 5208813 (1993-05-01), Stallmo
patent: 5218695 (1993-06-01), Noveck et al.
patent: 5218696 (1993-06-01), Baird et al.
patent: 5222217 (1993-06-01), Blount et al.
patent: 5235601 (1993-08-01), Stallmo et al.
patent: 5251308 (1993-10-01), Frank
patent: 5255270 (1993-10-01), Yanai et al.
patent: 5261044 (1993-11-01), Dev et al.
patent: 5261051 (1993-11-01), Masden et al.
patent: 5274799 (1993-12-01), Brant et al.
patent: 5274807 (1993-12-01), Hoshen et al.
patent: 5276840 (1994-01-01), Yu
patent: 5276867 (1994-01-01), Kenley et al.
patent: 5283830 (1994-02-01), Hinsley et al.
patent: 5297265 (1994-03-01), Frank et al.
patent: 5305326 (1994-04-01), Solomon et al.
patent: 5313626 (1994-05-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5313646 (1994-05-01), Hendricks
patent: 5313647 (1994-05-01), Kaufman
patent: 5315602 (1994-05-01), Noya et al.
patent: 5317731 (1994-05-01), Dias et al.
patent: 5333305 (1994-07-01), Neufeld
patent: 5335235 (1994-08-01), Arnott et al.
patent: 5341381 (1994-08-01), Fuller
patent: 5355453 (1994-10-01), Row et al.
patent: 5357509 (1994-10-01), Ohizumi
patent: 5357612 (1994-10-01), Alaiwan
patent: 5377196
Langdon Daryl J.
Robbins Robert
Joyce Harold
Network Appliance Inc.
Swernofsky Law Group PC
LandOfFree
Laminar flow duct cooling system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Laminar flow duct cooling system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Laminar flow duct cooling system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2999946