Iontophoresis, electroporation and combination catheters for...

Surgery – Means for introducing or removing material from body for... – Infrared – visible light – ultraviolet – x-ray or electrical...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C604S501000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06219577

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates in general to devices for enhancing the local delivery of drugs, pharmaceuticals, plasmids, genes, and other agents into tissues or cells of the living body. In particular, the present invention relates to catheter-based devices which provide an electrical driving force that can increase the rate of migration of drugs and other therapeutic agents out of a polymer matrix into body tissues and into cells using iontophoresis only, electroporation only, or combined iontophoresis and electroporation. The two procedures may be applied sequentially in any order without removing or repositioning the catheter. In addition, the present invention relates to catheter devices which, if used in arteries, veins, or compartments of the heart to electrically enhance drug delivery to the tissues, do not seriously compromise blood flow through the vessel during treatment.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Treatment agents, such as medicines, are generally administered to the body by various methods, such as topical application, oral ingestion, intravascular, intramuscular or parenteral injection and, less commonly, by aerosol insufflation and by transdermal iontophoresis. In all of these treatments there is an immediate dilution effect greatly reducing the concentration of the agent to which the target tissues or cells are exposed. Also, medicines administered by these systems may be more vulnerable to processes such as metabolic degradation, inactivation by binding to plasma proteins or accelerated clearance from the body. These processes adversely affect the drug's concentration and residence time in the target tissues and reduce its therapeutic efficacy.
Most of the above modes of drug administration also expose non-target tissues, i.e. those that do not require treatment, to the action of the drugs, with the consequent risk of serious side effects. It is this risk towards non-target tissues that reduces a drug's efficacy by restricting systemic concentrations to a threshold level above which side effects would become unacceptable.
Local drug delivery procedures can obviate some of the metabolic breakdown, early clearance and side effect problems affecting efficacy by presenting therapeutic concentrations of a drug only to the target site, minimizing effects upon non-target tissues. The reduction in quantity of a drug required minimizes side effects and can also result in lower treatment costs.
Recognition of the advantages of local delivery strategies has stimulated the development of a number of catheter-based delivery devices which apply drugs directly to the body tissues at specific locations, often to sites that would be otherwise inaccessible without surgery. However, if the specific target for an agent is intracellular, simple local application of the drug, followed by its passive diffusion into tissues, does not facilitate movement of the drug across cell surface membrane barriers into intracellular compartments. Diffusion away from the target cells occurs and high extracellular concentrations are rarely sustained long enough to mediate significant passage into the cells. Some drugs penetrate intact cell membranes by diffusion only very poorly and may require specific carrier or bulk transport by a phagocytic or pinocytic mechanism, to penetrate the cell membrane. These natural transport systems operate inefficiently, or not at all, when the tissues are affected by disease.
Double balloon catheters have been used to confine a drug solution to a specific segment of a blood vessel requiring treatment. For this use, internal lumens in the catheter are needed to transport the liquid drug to the isolated compartment and to evacuate any remaining drug after treatment. Apart from the dangers in occluding blood flow with the balloons and the associated ischaemic risk, any downstream leakage due to defective balloon sealing can also result in overdosing of the drug. Moreover, much drug can be lost through side branches arising from the vessel in the isolated segment between the balloons.
Devices have also been developed to try to improve the depth of penetration into tissue by pressure driving a solution of the drug into the vessel wall via tiny orifices in the fabric of a balloon. There is, however, some evidence that high pressure “jetting” of a drug solution out of small pores close to the vessel lumen can in fact cause vessel wall injury. The development of double skinned, microporous (or weeping) balloons obviated this “jetting” effect to some extent, but diffusion of the drug into the vessel wall is still slow, and much of the drug can be lost through subsequent “washout effects”.
Iontophoretic catheters have been used in some animal angioplasty studies to provide an electrical driving force for movement of a drug into tissues. This technique requires that the agent to be delivered carries an electrical charge under the local physiological pH conditions. While iontophoresis does enhance the delivery of drugs into body tissues, it has been shown in transdermal iontophoresis (“TDI”), that migration of drugs through skin predominantly occurs via extracellular pathways (sweat glands and hair follicle channels) where the current densities are much higher than elsewhere. This preferential channel movement can be favorable towards providing high drug concentrations in the skin capillary bed and onward into the circulation. However, with other tissues, such as blood vessels, the delivery of drugs to the vessel wall cells will be of low efficiency.
Angioplasty procedures generally involve the introduction of a small balloon catheter into the femoral artery in a patient's leg and, with the help of a guide wire, the catheter is passed by remote manipulation under fluoroscopy into the heart. The balloon can then be positioned in a region of a coronary artery that has become constricted due to atherosclerosis and by inflating and deflating the balloon several times the bore of the diseased artery is mechanically widened until a satisfactory blood flow through the vessel has been restored. If the artery is severely damaged by disease, and perhaps hardened by calcium deposition, this balloon inflation may also cause some degree of additional injury with local de-endothelialisation and exposure of underlying extracellular matrix components such as collagen and elastin. In a few patients excessive recruitment of platelets and fibrinogen can then result in an acute thrombotic occlusion. This is now less common, however, with the routine use of heparin and aspirin cover during the angioplasty procedure.
Generally, angioplasty procedures produce excellent results obviating the need for bypass surgery, but in about 30-40% of patients, an ostensibly successful initial dilatation of the artery may be followed by a renarrowing of the vessel (restenosis) some 3 to 9 months later. If this restenosis is severe, these patients may require a second angioplasty procedure, often with implantation of a stent to act as a scaffold in the vessel. In other cases arterial reconstruction under by-pass surgery, which is a higher risk procedure, may be required. With more than 800,000 PTCA procedures now performed world-wide annually, the socio-economic implication of this 30-40% restenosis rate has become a matter of serious concern to interventional cardiologists.
The pathophysiology of this late restenosis is complex, and involves a wide range of cellular and molecular responses, many of which are not yet fully understood. Although a number of putative targets for drug interference have been identified, more than 50 clinical trials (some large and multi-center) with a wide range of different drugs have failed to reveal a satisfactory pharmacotherapeutic approach to reducing the incidence of restenosis. One problem is that for some of the potentially useful drugs, it is not possible by systemic administration to get a therapeutically effective level of the drug in the vessel wall tissue without significantly affecting non-target tissues elsewhere.
Accordingly, wh

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Iontophoresis, electroporation and combination catheters for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Iontophoresis, electroporation and combination catheters for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Iontophoresis, electroporation and combination catheters for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2481069

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.