Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Accounting
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-13
2004-12-14
Jaketic, Bryan (Department: 3627)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Accounting
C705S002000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06832208
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates generally to business methods and apparatus for manually entering invoice data into a procurement or accounts payable database. More specifically the invention relates to detecting and correcting errors when such data is entered into a business process.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Procurement of products and services by companies for use within the company or for use in the manufacture of products has been developed and automated to a high degree. The technologies of electronic commerce provide significant advantages when applied to procurement systems. Once a product or service is ordered, and shipped by a supplier, the supplier normally requests payment by sending an invoice to the company which made the purchase.
While many systems have been developed for sending and receiving invoices electronically, a significant number of suppliers and purchasers continue to send and receive hardcopy invoices. Although fax technology is often used, as well as e-mail and conventional postal or courier services, the net is that a hardcopy invoice or equivalent image must be manually entered into the purchaser's procurement or accounts payable system. Where a large number of invoices must be entered manually, errors are inevitable. Accordingly, methods and apparatus for entering invoices while minimizing or eliminating errors are desired.
K. Yukihiro in Japanese patent 11134419 describes a bill correction device for updating information in a stored electronic bill, based on comparison between an input bill and the stored bill. A correction unit updates the stored bill. Checking work is significantly reduced by judging from the number of times of correction whether the content of the two bills are the same.
T. Setsuo in Japanese patent 11306247 describes an accounting processing system which deals with errors on slips. By totalizing a result, a computer detects errors. The computer also produces correction data and a slip to be added for elimination of the error.
In an article entitled “MS Invoice Technical Design and Deployment,” there is described a web-based invoicing application enabling suppliers to electronically submit invoices directly into a company's SAP R/3 enterprise resource application.
P. Houghtaling in an article titled “IBM's Small Suppliers Reap Big Rewards,” describes a web site to post customized business forms for use by suppliers. The suppliers send invoices electronically using the forms thereby eliminating manual data entry.
A document of the monitor application titled “monitor—The complete IT solution for Intermodal Operators,” describes how manual checking is replaced by automatic invoice checking facilities using a job's dispatch plan. This insures invoices do not duplicate previous payment requests.
A document of the ELF eInvoice application discloses a system for automating the manual review of legal invoices.
Despite the above-described developments, there remains a need for reducing errors in systems which manually enter invoices. In accordance with the teachings of the present invention there is defined a new process for entering invoices while reducing the number of errors involved. It is believed that such a process would constitute a significant advancement in the art.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore a principal object of the present invention to enhance the invoice entry art by providing a process for invoice entry with enhanced auditing capabilities.
It is another object to provide such a process wherein enhanced operational capabilities are possible.
These and other objects are attained in accordance with one embodiment of the invention wherein there is provided a method of invoice entry, comprising the steps of, entering data from an invoice, by a first person, into a first database having a status indicator associated with the data from the invoice, and setting the status indicator to entered, entering a subset of the data from the invoice, by a second person different from the first person, into the database, matching the subset of the data entered by the second person with the data entered by the first person and highlighting any unmatched entries, either re-entering the unmatched entries by the second person and changing the status indicator to audit passed, or setting the status indicator to audit failed, or setting the status indicator to audit passed if there are no unmatched entries, and either posting the entered invoice data by the first person, to a second database, if the status indicator is audit passed, or re-entering the unmatched entries by the first person, changing the status indicator to re-entered and thereafter proceeding to the matching step, or changing the status indicator, by the first person to cancel.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention there is provided an invoice entry system, comprising, means for entering data from an invoice, by a first person, into a first database having a status indicator associated with the data from the invoice, and setting the status indicator to entered, means for entering a subset of the data from the invoice, by a second person different from the first person, into the database, means for matching the subset of the data entered by the second person with said data entered by the first person and highlighting any unmatched entries, means for either re-entering the unmatched entries by the second person and changing the status indicator to audit passed, or setting the status indicator to audit failed, or setting the status indicator to audit passed if there are no unmatched entries, and means for either posting the entered invoice data by the first person, to a second database, if the status indicator is audit passed, or re-entering the unmatched entries by the first person, changing the status indicator to re-entered and thereafter proceeding to the matching step, or changing the status indicator, by the first person to cancel.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4642767 (1987-02-01), Lerner
patent: 5121945 (1992-06-01), Thomson et al.
patent: 5325291 (1994-06-01), Garrett et al.
patent: 5404509 (1995-04-01), Klein
patent: 5666490 (1997-09-01), Gillings et al.
patent: 5787443 (1998-07-01), Palmer
patent: 5812989 (1998-09-01), Witt et al.
patent: 5813009 (1998-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5848426 (1998-12-01), Wang et al.
patent: 5883957 (1999-03-01), Moline et al.
patent: 5918216 (1999-06-01), Miksovsky et al.
patent: 5963925 (1999-10-01), Kolling et al.
patent: 6041312 (2000-03-01), Bickerton et al.
patent: 6058380 (2000-05-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 6128602 (2000-10-01), Northington et al.
patent: 6148291 (2000-11-01), Radican
patent: 6275940 (2001-08-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 6333976 (2001-12-01), Lesley
patent: 6400997 (2002-06-01), Rapp, III
patent: 6542841 (2003-04-01), Snyder
patent: 11134419 (1999-05-01), None
patent: 11306247 (1999-11-01), None
“MS Invoice Design and Deployment: Web-Based Invoicing at Microsoft,” retrieved Apr. 01, 2000 from www.microsoft.com/technet/showcase/commerce/webbinv.asp.
P. Houghtaling, “IBM's Small Suppliers Reap Big Awards,” retrieved Mar. 29, 2000 from www.ecomworld.com/htm/articles/ecw7_3.htm.
“Monitor-The Complete IT Solution for Intermodal Operators,” retrieved Apr. 01, 2000 from www.softwaredecisions.com/monitor-2.htm.
S. Fleischer, “Common Sense Guide to Cost Control and Greater Corporate Profits,” CPA Journal Online, Apr. 1993.
E. Gibson, “New Software will Streamline University Transactions, ” The Daily Nebraskan, Sep. 1997.
“Expense Management Service, TSL Services Inc.,” retrieved from www.tsl.com/services/expense_mgt_serv.html.
“Elf eInvoice Why Use eInvoice,” retrieved Mar. 31, 2000 from www.elftech.com/prodserv/lawfirm/eWhyUseEInvoice.htm.
Berry Charles F.
Crowningshield Cindy L.
Marsh David C.
Heslin Rothenberg Farley & & Mesiti P.C.
Jaketic Bryan
Radigan, Esq. Kevin P.
Schiesser William E.
LandOfFree
Invoice entry does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Invoice entry, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Invoice entry will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3326532