Intramedullary hip nail with bifurcated lock

Details Intramedullary hip nail with bifurcated lock Intramedullary hip nail with bifurcated lock

2001-10-17

2003-11-18

Philogene, Pedro (Department: 3732)

Surgery

Instruments

Orthopedic instrumentation

C606S065000, C606S075000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06648889

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to an intramedullary system for coupling first and second bone portions across a fracture therebetween and, more specifically, to an intramedullary hip pinning system for rigidly interconnecting a femoral head to the remaining portion of the femur and across a fracture in the area of the femoral neck.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The intramedullary nail was introduced in the 1930's. This device was inserted into the intramedullary canal of the femur resulting in immediate fixation of fractures, early mobilization of the patient, and a lower morbidity and mortality. A number of nails have been introduced for fracture fixation about the femur in proximal end, including the Jewett Nail and Enders Nail.
Intramedullary nails were also inserted down the entire length of the femoral canal to provide a basis for the construct. Threaded wires, standard bone screws or cannulated bone screws were then inserted through or along side the proximal nail and into the femoral head to provide fixation and rotational stability. Compression of the proximal bone fragments against each other was not available and in longer nails the distal tip of the nail tends to rotate out of plane which forces the surgeon to locate the distal screw holes using fluoroscopy by a method commonly known as “free-handing”.
In the 1960s, the compression hip screw was introduced, resulting in improved fixation of the proximal femur. A lag screw assembly was inserted into the femoral head, a plate was attached to the lateral femur, and a compression screw joined the two. These implants provided a more rigid structure for the patient and allowed the surgeon to compress the fractured fragments against each other thereby decreasing the time to mobility. A number of compression hip screws have been introduced for fracture fixation about the proximal femur.
During implantation typical compression hip screws require an incision at least equal to the length of plate being used which extends operative time and blood loss. The side plate also creates a protuberance on the lateral side which provides an annoyance to the patient. Compression hip screw systems also fail to provide adequate compression in oseteogenic patients because the lag screw threads fail to obtain sufficient purchase due to poor bone stock. Poor purchase is known to contribute to nonunion, malunion and the lag screw assembly eroding through the superior bone of the head of the femur in a condition known as “cut out”. Additionally, many patients are dissatisfied with the results of compression hip screw surgery because of the excessive sliding to a medial displacement and shortening position which leads to a change in gait.
Newer devices and inventions explored additions to the nail and lag screw assembly to improve the fixation and ease or eliminate the need to locate the distal screw holes. These newer devices are commonly classified as “expanding devices” and expand in size, after placement, to fill the intramedullary cavity. Freedland, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,632,101, 4,862,883 and 4,721,103, Chemello, U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,264 and Davis, U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,103 describe a method of fixation which provides points which contact the internal cortical wall. In these patents a mechanism is actuated deploying arms or anchor blades through the cancellous bone to contact the inner cortical wall. These methods are complex, do not deploy through the cortical bone and are difficult to retract should the nail or lag screw assembly require extraction.
Other expanding devices provide surface contact with the internal cortical wall resulting in a wedge effect. Kurth, U.S. Pat. No. 4,590,930, Raftopoulos, U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,539 and Aginski, U.S. Pat. No. 4,236,512 among others have described mechanisms which deploy or expand with a molly bolt concept. These methods are complex and difficult to retract should the nail or lag screw assembly requires extraction and do not deploy through the cortical bone.
Bolesky, U.S. Pat. No. 4,275,717, was the first to discuss engagement within the cortical wall. However, Bolesky's invention does not address controlled penetration into the wall and required permanent implantation of the actuation rod. In addition, Bolesky does not address the fundamental problem of the actuation rod's protrusion extramedullarly into the surrounding musculature.
In earlier patents, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,976,139 and 6,183,474 B1, both incorporated herein by reference, Bramlet describes a surgical anchor which has deployable tangs. These tangs are simple design, internally positioned, yet easily deployed into, and if desired through, the cortical bone providing improved purchase for compression of a fracture; especially in osteogenic bone. These tangs are just as easily retracted should the device require explantation.
In 1988 Lawes, et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,681, disclosed a method of combining desirable aspects of both intramedullary nails and compression hip screws. Lawes described a method for joining the lag screw and nail to resist loosening or moving of the lag screw during the operation. Approximately 10 years ago Howmedica (Rutherford, N.J., United States) was the first to produce the “Gamma Nail”, named for its similarity in shape to the Greek letter, as an intramedullary hip compression screw device and other designs soon followed.
In 1990 Durham, et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,032,125, disclosed an intramedullary hip compression screw system which incorporated a sleeve for slidably receiving the lag screw. A set screw was then used to engage the sleeve thereby preventing translation and rotation of the sleeve. This device allowed for reduction of the proximal fragment using the same method as conventional hip screw assemblies. Shortly thereafter Smith & Nephew Richards (Memphis, Tenn., United States) produced the “Intramedullary Hip Compression Screw”.
These intramedullary hip compression screw systems required a few small incisions, allowed capture of the most proximal fragments of the femur, rigid fixation of the most proximal and distal fragments, and a sliding lag screw assembly which allows reduction of the fragments as the patient ambulates or begins to bear weight on the fractured limb. These nails are typically held in place on the distal end through interference forces with the intramedullary canal and through the use of locking screws.
The typical intramedullary hip compression screw's shape accommodates the relative shape of the greater trochanter and femoral shaft, neck and head fragments. Therefore, the shape of the hip is preserved. Indications for use of a compression hip screw are expanded because fractures to the subtrochanteric region of the proximal femur, as well as reverse obliquity fractures can be treated more efficiently. Additionally, the bulk of an intramedullary hip screw blocks excessive sliding of the proximal fragment.
Current intramedullary compression hip screw systems continue to suffer from some of the same problems exhibited in those of its predecessors. Osteogenic bone still provides a poor medium for purchase of the lag screw assembly thread inhibiting adequate compression and rotational stability. Longer nails continue to see the distal tip of the nail rotating out of plane forcing the surgeon to locate the distal screw holes by the free-hand method. The free-handing technique leads to an increased surgical time and exposes the surgeon and patient to increased radiation dosages.
Current intramedullary compression hip screw systems also provide new limitations that hamper their effectiveness. One such limitation is evident in both Lawes' and Durham's designs. These designs require the use of a set screw to prevent rotation of the lag screw; the set screw in the Lawes patent interacts directly with the lag screw, while Durham's is indirect with the lag screw. To ensure proper mating takes place the Smith & Nephew Richards' systems provides a torque wrench, while Howmedica's system requires tightening of the set screw to f

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Intramedullary hip nail with bifurcated lock does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Intramedullary hip nail with bifurcated lock, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Intramedullary hip nail with bifurcated lock will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3176184