Intervertebral spacers

Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C606S064000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06423095

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention broadly concerns devices for stabilizing the spine and devices for implantation between vertebrae, and more particularly in the intradiscal space. Specifically, the invention concerns hollow intervertebral spacers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Intervertebral discs, located between the end-plates of adjacent vertebrae, stabilize the spine, distribute forces between vertebrae and cushion vertebral bodies. A normal intervertebral disc includes a semi-gelatinous component, the nucleus pulposus, which is surrounded and confined by an outer, fibrous ring called the annulus fibrosus. In a healthy, undamaged spine, the annulus fibrosus prevents the nucleus pulposus from protruding outside the disc space.
Spinal discs may be displaced or damaged due to trauma, disease or aging. Disruption of the annulus fibrous allows the nucleus pulposus to protrude into the vertebral canal, a condition commonly referred to as a herniated or ruptured disc. The extruded nucleus pulposus may press on the spinal nerve, which may result in nerve damage, pain, numbness, muscle weakness and paralysis. Intervertebral discs may also deteriorate due to the normal aging process or disease. As a disc dehydrates and hardens, the disc space height will be reduced leading to instability of the spine, decreased mobility and pain.
Sometimes the only relief from the symptoms of these conditions is a discectomy, or surgical removal of a portion or all of an intervertebral disc followed by fusion of the adjacent vertebrae. The removal of the damaged or unhealthy disc will allow the disc space to collapse. Collapse of the disc space can cause instability of the spine, abnormal joint mechanics, premature development of arthritis or nerve damage, in addition to severe pain.
Bone grafts are often used to fill and preserve the intervertebral space and promote fusion. For example, in the Smith-Robinson technique of cervical fusion, the surgeon prepares the end-plates of the adjacent vertebral bodies to accept a graft after the disc has been removed. The end-plates are generally prepared to be parallel surfaces with a high speed burr. The surgeon sculpts the graft to fit tightly between the bone surfaces so that the graft is held by compression between the vertebral bodies. The bone graft is intended to provide structural support and promote bone ingrowth to achieve a solid fusion of the affected joint.
Unfortunately, the use of bone grafts presents several disadvantages. Autografts, bone material surgically removed from the patient, can be undesirable because they may not yield a sufficient quantity of graft material. The additional surgery to extract the autograft also increases the risk of infection and blood loss. Moreover, the structural integrity at the donor site can be reduced. Furthermore, some patients complain that the graft harvesting surgery is more painful than the fusion surgery.
Allograft material, which is obtained from donors of the same species, is more readily obtained. However, allografts can be disadvantageous because of the risk of disease transmission, immune reactions and religious objections. Furthermore, allogenic bone does not have the osteoinductive potential of autogenous bone and therefore may provide only temporary support.
Both allograft and autograft present additional difficulties. Graft alone may not provide the stability required to withstand spinal loads. Internal fixation may prevent graft collapse but presents its own disadvantages such as the need for more complex surgery. Also, the surgeon is often required to repeatedly trim the graft material to obtain the correct size to fill and stabilize the disc space. This trial and error approach increases the length of time required for surgery. Furthermore, the graft material usually has a smooth surface which does not provide a good friction fit between the adjacent vertebrae. Slippage of the graft may cause neural and vascular injury as well as collapse of the disc space.
Prosthetic implants can be used to prevent collapse of the space. The implant must provide temporary support and allow bone ingrowth. Success of the discectomy and fusion procedure requires the development of a contiguous growth of bone to create a solid mass because the implant may not withstand the compressive loads on the spine for the life of the patient.
A need has remained for fusion devices that preserve the intradiscal space and support the vertebral column until the adjacent vertebrae are fused yet still encourage bone ingrowth to achieve a solid fusion. A need has also remained for devices which reduce the length of surgical procedures and the risk of complications.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the invention, hollow spinal spacers having anatomically friendly shapes and features are provided for engagement between vertebrae. The spacers are sized and configured to fill a space between adjacent vertebrae and include an anterior wall having opposite ends, a posterior wall having opposite ends, and two lateral walls. The lateral walls are each connected between the opposite ends of the anterior and posterior walls to define a chamber. The walls also define a superior face having a first opening which is in communication with the chamber and an opposite inferior face having a second opening which is also in communication with the chamber. The superior and inferior faces each define vertebral engaging surfaces. In one specific embodiment, the spacer is D-shaped having a basic flat geometry and a convexly curved anterior surface on the anterior wall. The flat spacer provides a friction fit by virtue of roughened vertebral engaging surfaces. In another specific embodiment, the implant is smile-shaped, having a radius in the superior and inferior faces which match the shape of vertebral end-plates. In another aspect of this invention, spacers include a biconvex shape in addition to a smile contour. In still a further aspect of this invention, spacers are provided with vertebral engaging surfaces that include blades for driving into the bone. In another specific embodiment, hollow spacers of this invention include lateral wings which are extendable into the disc space to prevent significant subsidence of the implant into the vertebral bodies.
One object of the invention is to provide an implant for engagement between vertebrae which restores the intervertebral disc space and supports the vertebral column while promoting bone ingrowth. Another object of the present invention is to provide spinal spacers which avoid the problems associated with allograft and autograft, such as the need for trial and error trimming of graft material to fit the intradiscal space, donor site morbidity and disease transmission risks.
One benefit of the implants of the present invention is that they provide structure for the space resulting from the removal of an intervertebral disc without the need for invasive autograft harvesting, allograft complications or internal fixation. Other objects and further benefits of the present invention will become apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art from the following written description and accompanying figures.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3848601 (1974-11-01), Ma et al.
patent: 4309777 (1982-01-01), Patil
patent: 4349921 (1982-09-01), Kuntz
patent: 4501269 (1985-02-01), Bagby
patent: 4526909 (1985-07-01), Urist
patent: 4596574 (1986-06-01), Urist
patent: 4599086 (1986-07-01), Doty
patent: 4620327 (1986-11-01), Caplan et al.
patent: 4623553 (1986-11-01), Ries et al.
patent: 4714469 (1987-12-01), Kenna
patent: 4743256 (1988-05-01), Brantigan
patent: 4759766 (1988-07-01), Buettner-Janx et al.
patent: 4772287 (1988-09-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5147402 (1992-09-01), Bohler et al.
patent: 5282861 (1994-02-01), Kaplan
patent: 5306309 (1994-04-01), Wagner et al.
patent: 5397364 (1995-03-01), Kozak et al.
patent: 5425772 (1995-06-01), Brantigan
patent: 5443515 (1995-08-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 5514180 (1996-05-01), Heggeness et al.
patent: 5522899 (1996-06-01), Michelson
patent: 5609635 (1997-03-01), M

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Intervertebral spacers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Intervertebral spacers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Intervertebral spacers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2843650

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.