Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone
Reexamination Certificate
1999-03-11
2002-04-09
Smith, Jeffrey A. (Department: 3732)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Implantable prosthesis
Bone
C623S017110, C623S017150, C623S017160
Reexamination Certificate
active
06368350
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention pertains to stabilization of an intervertebral disc space. More particularly, the invention pertains to prosthetic intervertebral disc devices and methods for stabilizing an intervertebral disc joint while providing joint mobility.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Chronic back problems can cause pain and disability for a large segment of the population. Frequently, the cause of back pain is traceable to diseased disc material between opposing vertebrae. When the disc material is diseased, the opposing vertebrae may be inadequately supported, resulting in persistent pain.
Surgical techniques have been developed to remove the diseased disc material and fuse the joint between opposing vertebral bodies. Arthrodesis of the intervertebral joint can reduce the pain associated with movement of an intervertebral joint having diseased disc material. Generally, fusion techniques involve removal of the diseased disc, drilling a bore for receiving a spinal fusion implant and inserting the implant between the opposing vertebral bodies. Spinal fusion implants and related surgical instruments for implanting a fusion device are known and disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,741,253; 5,658,337; 5,609,636; 5,505,732; 5,489,308; 5,489,307; 5,484,437; 5,458,638; 5,055,104; 5,026,373; 5,015,247; and 4,961,740.
One disadvantage to intervertebral disc fusion is that the relative motion between the fused vertebrae is no longer possible, causing both stiffness in the spine and difficulties in the areas above and below the fused vertebrae. Thus, one alternative to fusing a diseased intervertebral joint space is to remove the diseased disc material and replace it with a prosthetic disc. Examples of prosthetic disc devices are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,759,766; 4,759,769; 5,258,031; 5,401,269; 5,425,773; 5,556,431 and 5,676,701. However, while such devices may provide greater mobility when compared to fused vertebrae, the mobility permitted by most known devices does not fully account for normal vertebral biomechanics.
Accordingly, there is a continuing need for intervertebral stabilization apparatuses and methods which provide mobility at the diseased intervertebral joint space. Moreover, there is a need for intervertebral stabilization methods which mimic normal intervertebral biomechanics.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to devices and methods for intervertebral stabilization which provide mobility at the diseased intervertebral joint. One advantageous feature of a device according to the invention is that it mimics normal intervertebral biomechanics by providing a variable instantaneous axis of rotation.
Throughout the specification, guidance may be provided through lists of examples. In each instance, the recited list serves only as a representative group. It is not meant, however, that the list is exclusive.
In general, an intervertebral prosthetic device (IPD) of the invention is an assembly including a first member for contacting a first vertebrae, a second member for contacting a second vertebrae and an intermediate member positioned between the first and second members. The assembly includes at least two bearing surfaces. A first bearing surface formed between the first member and the intermediate member and the second bearing surface formed between the second member and the intermediate member. At least one of the bearing surfaces is curved and at least one of the bearing surfaces is flat. The curved bearing surface can be spherical, cylindrical, ellipsoidal, oblong, etc.
In some embodiments, the curved bearing surface provides at least three degrees of rotational freedom. The linear bearing surface can provide at least two degrees of translational freedom and one degree of rotational freedom. The rotational and translational freedom of an IPD can also be selectively limited through arrangements disclosed herein.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4759766 (1988-07-01), Buettner-Janz et al.
patent: 4759769 (1988-07-01), Hedman et al.
patent: 4911718 (1990-03-01), Lee et al.
patent: 4946378 (1990-08-01), Hirayama et al.
patent: 4955908 (1990-09-01), Frey et al.
patent: 5047055 (1991-09-01), Bao et al.
patent: 5071437 (1991-12-01), Steffee
patent: 5123926 (1992-06-01), Pisharodi
patent: 5258031 (1993-11-01), Salib et al.
patent: 5401269 (1995-03-01), Buttner-Janz et al.
patent: 5425773 (1995-06-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 5507816 (1996-04-01), Bullivant
patent: 5556431 (1996-09-01), Buttner-Janz
patent: 5676701 (1997-10-01), Yuan et al.
patent: 5888226 (1999-03-01), Rogozinski
patent: 6039763 (2000-03-01), Shelokov
patent: 6113637 (2000-09-01), Gill et al.
patent: 566810 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 0 747 025 (1996-12-01), None
patent: 2 718 635 (1995-10-01), None
patent: 2 730 159 (1996-08-01), None
patent: 94/04100 (1994-03-01), None
Bogduk et al., “A biological basis for instantaneous centres of rotation of the vertebral column,”Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H], 209(3):177-83 (1995).
Gertzbein et al., “Centrode Patterns and Segmental Instability in Degenerative Disc Disease,”Spine, 10(3):257-61 (1985).
Griffith et al., “A Multicenter Retrospecitve Study of the Clinical Results of the LINK® SB Charite Intervertebral Prosthesis,”Spine, 19(16):1842-1849 (1994).
Haher et al., “Instantaneous axis of rotation as a function of the three columns of the spine,”Spine, 17(6):S149-54 (Jun. 1992).
Haher et al., “The effect of the three columns of the spine on the instantaneous axis of rotation in flexion and extension,”Spine, 16(8): S312-18 (Aug. 1991).
Klein et al., “Relocation of the bending axis during flexion—extension of lumbar intervertebral discs and its implications for prolapse,”Spine, 8(6):659-64 (Sep. 1983).
Kostuik, John P., “Alternatives to Spinal Fusion,”Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 29(4):701-15 (Oct. 1998).
Liu et al., “A new technique for the three—dimensional study of the spine in vitro and in vivo by using a motion—analysis system,”J. Spinal Disord., 10(4):329-38 (Aug. 1997).
Pearcy et al., “Instantaneous axes of rotation of the lumbar intervertebral joints,”Spine, 13(9):1033-41 (Sep. 1988).
Seligman et al., Computer analysis of spinal segment motion in degenerative disc disease with and without axial loading,Spine, 9(6):566-73 (Sep. 1984).
Yoshioka et al., “Motion characteristic of the normal lumbar spine in young adults; instantaneous axis of rotation and vertebral center motion analyses,”J. Spinal Disord., 3(2):103-13 (Jun. 1990).
White et al., “Part 1: Scoliosis, Anatomic Considerations,”Clinical Biomechanics of the SPINE, Second Edition, pp. 128-130 (1978).
Erickson Richard A.
Griffith Steven L.
Merchant & Gould P.C.
Smith Jeffrey A.
Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.
LandOfFree
Intervertebral disc prosthesis and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Intervertebral disc prosthesis and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Intervertebral disc prosthesis and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2903124