Internet streaming media workflow architecture

Details Internet streaming media workflow architecture Internet streaming media workflow architecture

2001-06-08

2004-08-31

Rones, Charles (Department: 2175)

Data processing: database and file management or data structures

Database design

Data structure types

C707S793000, C707S793000, C709S223000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06785688

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to computer related information search and retrieval, and specifically to multimedia and streaming media search tools.
BACKGROUND
An aspect of the Internet (also referred to as the World Wide Web, or Web) that has contributed to its popularity is the plethora of multimedia and streaming media files available to users. However, finding a specific multimedia or streaming media file buried among the millions of files on the Web is often an extremely difficult task. The volume and variety of informational content available on the web is likely continue to increase at a rather substantial pace. This growth, combined with the highly decentralized nature of the web, creates substantial difficulty in locating particular informational content.
Streaming media refers to audio, video, multimedia, textual, and interactive data files that are delivered to a user's computer via the Internet or other network environment and begin to play on the user's computer before delivery of the entire file is completed. One advantage of streaming media is that streaming media files begin to play before the entire file is downloaded, saving users the long wait typically associated with downloading the entire file. Digitally recorded music, movies, trailers, news reports, radio broadcasts and live events have all contributed to an increase in streaming content on the Web. In addition, less expensive high-bandwidth connections such as cable, DSL and T1 are providing Internet users with speedier, more reliable access to streaming media content from news organizations, Hollywood studios, independent producers, record labels and even home users themselves.
A user typically uses a search engine to find specific information on the Internet. A search engine is a set of programs accessible at a network site within a network, for example a local area network (LAN) or the Internet and World Wide Web. One program, called a “robot” or “spider”, pre-traverses a network in search of documents (e.g., web pages) and builds large index files of keywords found in the documents. Typically, a user formulates a query comprising one or more search terms and submits the query to another program of the search engine. In response, the search engine inspects its own index files and displays a list of documents that match the search query, typically as hyperlinks. The user then typically activates one of the hyperlinks to see the information contained in the document.
Search engines, however, have drawbacks. For example, many typical search engines are oriented to discover textual information only. In particular, they are not well suited for indexing information contained in structured databases (e.g. relational databases), voice related information, audio related information, multimedia, and streaming media, etc. Also, mixing data from incompatible data sources is difficult for conventional search engines.
Another disadvantage of conventional search engines is that irrelevant information is aggregated with relevant information. For example, it is not uncommon for a search engine on the web to locate hundreds of thousands of documents in response to a single query. Many of those documents are found because they coincidentally include the same keyword in the search query. Sifting through search results in the thousands, however, is a daunting task. For example, if a user were looking for a song having the title “I Am The Walrus,” the search query would typically contain the word “walrus.” The list of hits would include documents providing biological information on walruses, etc. Thus, the user would have to review an enormous number of these hits before finally (if ever) reaching a hit related to the desired song title. Adding to a user's frustration is the possibility that many of the search results are duplicates and/or variants of each other, leading to the same document (e.g. uniform resource locator, URL). Further difficulty occurs in trying to evaluate the relative merit or relevance of concurrently found documents. The search for specific content based on a few key words will almost always identify documents whose individual relevance is highly variable.
Thus, there is a need for an automated media search tool that provides information to a user that overcomes the previously described drawbacks and disadvantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method and system for searching for media on a computer network utilizes metadata. The media are searched for using at least one search term. Metadata associated with the media are extracted from the search results. This extracted metadata is enhanced. The search results are grouped into group(s), wherein extracted metadata associated with search results in a group have at least one common attribute. The method and system provide the media and/or the media uniform resource locator (URL).


REFERENCES:
patent: 5241305 (1993-08-01), Fascenda et al.
patent: 5345227 (1994-09-01), Fascenda et al.
patent: 5483522 (1996-01-01), Derby et al.
patent: 5917424 (1999-06-01), Goldman et al.
patent: 5920854 (1999-07-01), Kirsch et al.
patent: 5941944 (1999-08-01), Messerly
patent: 5953718 (1999-09-01), Wical
patent: 5963940 (1999-10-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 5991756 (1999-11-01), Wu
patent: 5991809 (1999-11-01), Kriegsman
patent: 6112203 (2000-08-01), Bharat et al.
patent: 6138113 (2000-10-01), Dean et al.
patent: 6151584 (2000-11-01), Papierniak et al.
patent: 6175830 (2001-01-01), Maynard
patent: 6377995 (2002-04-01), Agraharam et al.
patent: 6389467 (2002-05-01), Eyal
patent: 6484199 (2002-11-01), Eyal
patent: 6519648 (2003-02-01), Eyal
patent: 6598051 (2003-07-01), Wiener et al.
Eric Rehm,Representing Internet Streaming Media Metadata Using MPEG-7 Multimedia Description Schemes, Jul. 2, 2000, pp. 1-14.
Network Working Group,Dublin Core Metadata for Resource Discovery, Sep. 1998, pp. 1-10.
Taalee Semantic Engine Brochure.
Eberman, et al., Compaq, Indexing Multimedia for the Internet,Cambridge Resarch Laboratory, Mar. 1999.
Kontothanassis, et al. Compaq,Design, Implementation, and Analysis of a Multimedia Indexing and Delivery Server, Cambridge Research Laboratory Aug. 1999.
John R. Smith & Shih-Fu Chang, Visually Searching the Web for Content,, Jul.-Sep. 1997, pp. 12-20.
Anne J. Gilliand-Swetland,Introduction to Metadata Setting the Stage, Jul. 5, 2000, pp. 1-11.
Max Chittister,Oracle InterMedia Annotator User's Guide, Release 1.5, 1999, 2000 Orcle Corporation.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Internet streaming media workflow architecture does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Internet streaming media workflow architecture, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Internet streaming media workflow architecture will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3361923