Interconnection device for low and high current stress...

Electricity: measuring and testing – Fault detecting in electric circuits and of electric components – Of individual circuit component or element

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C324S713000, C324S718000, C324S760020

Reexamination Certificate

active

06320391

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to electromigration test structures and more particularly, it relates to an improved interconnection test structure for evaluating electromigration characteristics in a more accurate and reliable manner.
2. Description of the Prior Art
As semiconductor integrated circuit devices are continuing to be designed with smaller and smaller dimensions so as to accommodate higher integration density such as for VLSI, the metal interconnection lines or wiring are made thinner and longer and the number of such metal interconnection lines is further increasing. Furthermore, in view of the progressive miniaturization of the VLSI semiconductor circuit components and in order to supply electrical current to the high density packed, active regions thereof, two or more metal interconnection levels are required. In addition, the electrical contact between the various metal interconnection levels must be provided through the use of very small holes referred to as “vias,” which are typically filled by a metal plug such as tungsten.
As a consequence, the density of the electric current flowing through the vias increases as the integration density increases. This high electric current will cause a diffusion phenomenon to occur referred to as “electromigration” where the metal atoms in the interconnection (metal line) migrate in the same direction as that of the electron movement. When this happens, the resultant metal atom migration will cause an atomic vacancy or void to be formed at the location from which the metal atoms have moved or will cause a hillock to be built up at the location where the metal atoms accumulate. When such voids are formed, the local cross-sectional area of the metal line will be decreased and the local current density in the metal line will be increased, thereby likely to cause a discontinuity or failure of the interconnection. On the other hand, when such hillocks are formed, this may also cause a failure due to a short circuit.
Thus, the electromigration characteristics of the metal conductors (e.g., aluminum, aluminum-alloys, and/or refractory metal) in the semiconductor integrated circuit devices are of a major concern. Accordingly, test methods for evaluating the electromigration resistance of conductors have been developed heretofore. One such traditional test structure
100
that has been adopted by the National Bureau of Standards for determining the electromigration characteristics and thus reliability is illustrated in FIG.
1
. Since the entire test structure
100
is located in a single planar surface, this is referred to as a “infinite source” structure.
The electromigration circuit element is comprised of a long, thin metal test conductor or line
102
having larger extension metal conductors
104
,
106
joined at each end of the test conductor
102
. The larger extension metal conductors
104
and
106
are coupled to an external current source
108
via test or bond pads
110
,
112
for applying electrical stressing current to the test conductor
102
. The length L of the test conductor
102
is about 800 &mgr;m, and the width W thereof is approximately 0.5 &mgr;m. The thickness of the test conductor is similar to the CMOS process technology used, such as 1 &mgr;m for a 1 micron technology. A pair of narrow transverse conductors
114
,
116
are joined adjacent the ends of the test conductor
102
. The narrow conductors
114
and
116
are coupled to a grounded voltmeter
118
via test or bond pads
120
,
122
for voltage measurements.
Initially, prior to performing the electromigration test the voltmeter
118
is used to measure the resistance of the unstressed test conductor
102
so as to define an “initial” resistance. For the electromigration evaluating test, an electrical stressing current having a specified current density such as about 1×10
6
amp/cm
2
is applied for a preselected amount of time to the test conductor
102
via the test pads
110
and
112
by the current source
108
so as to accelerate electromigration. Then, the stressing current is disconnected and the voltage across the test conductor
102
is measured again by the voltmeter via the test pads
120
,
122
to determine its resistance.
This process is repeated over and over until there is a “failure” in the test conductor
102
. As used herein, the term “failure” can be defined to be an increased resistance of 20 percent from the original unstressed resistance value. Therefore, the life of the interconnection can be estimated from elapsed time that it takes to cause the failure. Further, the test may be performed on the test conductor
102
which is heated to approximately 200° C. to 300° C. in order to accelerate the deterioration of the interconnection. Nevertheless, even under such conditions the typical test may require many weeks or a month before a failure occurs. As a result, this traditional method is not a practical testing method that can be employed.
In order to greatly shorten the testing period, there have been developed more recently several wafer-level electromigration test methods which utilize considerably higher current density and higher temperatures so as to accelerate the electromigration phenomenon in the interconnections. Such electromigration test techniques include those known as TRACE, SWEAT, Isothermal, and BEM. For example, the term “SWEAT” is an acronym for Standard Wafer Level Electromigration Acceleration Test which provides for a much larger current through the test conductor than the conventional “long-term” test. The SWEAT technique requires a typical time of only about 30 seconds at a current density of 1 to 2×10
7
amps/cm
2
for an aluminum interconnection. However, the SWEAT test has not been widely accepted in the semiconductor industry due to the lack of correlation between the results produced thereby and the results obtained from the more traditional “long-term” test.
Further, the SWEAT or Isothermal test cannot accurately predict the electromigration characteristics on metal interconnections with a single via, as shown in FIG.
2
. It will be noted that the test structure
200
of
FIG. 2
is identical to the test structure
100
of
FIG. 1
, except that it contains a single via
224
disposed adjacent each end of the test conductor
202
. Further, the test conductor
202
is formed on a different level than the extension conductors
204
,
206
; the narrow transverse conductors
214
,
216
; and test pads
210
,
212
,
220
,
222
. Accordingly, the test structure
200
of FIG.
2
is used to simulate a high-density semiconductor integrated circuit fabricated with multiple levels of metal interconnections in which metal-filled vias are electrically coupling the various metal interconnection layers. Since the test structure
200
is not contained in a single planar surface, it is referred to as a “finite source” structure.
As previously pointed out, the vias
224
are typically filled with a metal plug which is a refractory material such as tungsten. However, the physical properties of tungsten are substantially different from the physical properties of aluminum or aluminum-alloys forming the metal interconnection line
202
. Further, the dimensions of the vias
224
are extremely small and deep and are generally smaller than the metal interconnection line
202
. Thus, the test structure
200
of
FIG. 2
with a single via
224
located adjacent each end of the test conductor
202
will create a current crowding effect on the via region of the test conductor which leads to electromigration enhancement of the metal near the via. Also, when high current stressing is employed, the via region will experience electromigration failure before the electromigration failure of the metal interconnection line. Further, the area underneath the via may also fail initially before the electromigration failure of the metal interconnection line due to the intersection of grain boundaries (triple point).
Therefore, there is still a need for an interconne

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Interconnection device for low and high current stress... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Interconnection device for low and high current stress..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interconnection device for low and high current stress... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2585993

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.