Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Voting or election arrangement
Reexamination Certificate
2011-05-31
2011-05-31
Worjloh, Jalatee (Department: 3685)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Voting or election arrangement
C705S001100, C705S007110, C705S007120, C705S007290, C705S007320, C235S386000, C709S203000, C706S013000, C707S793000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07953628
ABSTRACT:
An interactive voter choice system providing voters mechanisms they can use to play more pro-active roles in influencing elections and policy-making by elected representatives in representative bodies than the relatively passive roles ascribed to them in the typical rules and regulations governing these elections, namely mechanisms that enable them to specify in written policy agendas their preferred policy options chosen from a comprehensive database of policy options, transmit their agendas to provide information and instructions to candidates for office, elected representatives and others; request candidates and representatives to use the comprehensive database to specify their preferred policy options in written agendas; and use voters' own agendas to build consensus, coalitions and voting blocs that can run and elect their own candidates for office and induce elected representatives to enact their agendas.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5400248 (1995-03-01), Chisholm
patent: 5875432 (1999-02-01), Sehr
patent: 7533097 (2009-05-01), Ayediran et al.
patent: 7665662 (2010-02-01), Faulk
patent: 2007/0023515 (2007-02-01), Urken
patent: 2007/0244749 (2007-10-01), Speiser et al.
Arvai et al., “Testing Alernative Decision Approacehs for Identifying Cleanup Priorities at Contaminated Sites”, 2003, American Chemical Society, vol. 37, No. 8.
Pew Research Center, “Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007”, Section 6: Government, Trust and Political Participation, Mar. 22, 2007, p. 45. Washington, D.C., United States of America. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312.
Pew Research Center, “Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007” Section 6: Government, Trust and Political Participation, Mar. 22, 2007, p. 46. Washington, D.C., United States of America. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312.
Thomas E. Mann “Redistricting Reform”, The National Voter, published by the League of Women Voters, Jun. 2005, p. 4, Washington, D.C. United States of America. http://www.lwv.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Redistricting&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=22&ContentID=7996.
LandOfFree
Interactive voter choice system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Interactive voter choice system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interactive voter choice system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2635877