Wells – Processes – Graveling or filter forming
Reexamination Certificate
2006-09-12
2006-09-12
Bates, Zakiya W. (Department: 3676)
Wells
Processes
Graveling or filter forming
C166S050000, C166S051000, C166S065100, C166S250110, C166S313000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07104324
ABSTRACT:
An intelligent well system and method has a sand face completion and a monitoring system to monitor application of a well operation. Various equipment and services may be used. In another aspect, the invention provides a monitoring system for determining placement of a well treatment. Yet another aspect of the invention is an instrumented sand screen. Another aspect is a connector for routing control lines.
REFERENCES:
patent: 6343651 (2002-02-01), Bixenman
patent: 6446729 (2002-09-01), Bixenman et al.
patent: 6513599 (2003-02-01), Bixenman et al.
patent: 6675891 (2004-01-01), Hailey et al.
patent: 2004/0149444 (2004-08-01), Cavender et al.
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (S.D. Tex.) (PACER Jun. 2, 2005) (5 pages), undated.
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, (N.D. Cal.) (PACER Aug. 11, 2005) (13 pages), undated.
Communication from United States District Court Transferring Case,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (S.D. Tex.), dated Sep. 7, 2004 (1 page).
Plaintiffs' Original Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (S.D. Tex.), filed May 14, 2004 (20 pages).
Defendants' Motions (1) to Dismiss the Complaint for Insufficiency of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, (2) to Dismiss Counts I-III of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, and (3) in the Alternative, to Transfer This Action to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (S.D. Tex.), filed Jul. 7, 2004 (49 pages).
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 19, 2004 (20 pages).
Answer of Defendants and Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.) filed Nov. 2, 2004 (20 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Dec. 3, 2004 (10 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
First Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 9, 2005 (16 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V.; (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technolgy's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (29 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil to Motions of Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (29 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (3 pages).
Plantiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (9 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (4 pages).
Reply of Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Kentucky Oil Technology's Opposition to First Amended, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (17 pages).
Schlumberger's Response to Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Schlumberger's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to STC's Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 3 and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V.(N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (4 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Kentucky Oil's Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.). entered Mar. 25, 2005 (2 pages).
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Counterdefendants' Motion to Dismiss,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), entered Apr. 8, 2005 (26 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.) filed Apr. 18, 2005 (8 pages).
Second Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed May 6, 2005 (20 pages).
Plaintiff Memry Corporation's Reply to Kentucky Oil Technology N..V.'s Second Amended Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Jun. 3, 2005 (9 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notion of Motion to Dismiss the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Counterclaims in Kentucky Oil Technology's Second Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., (N.D. Cal.), filed Jun. 3, 2005 (18 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil Technology to Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil's Second Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-0
Bixenman Patrick W.
Danos Jake A.
Howard Peter V.
Johnson Craig D.
Langlais Michael
Bates Zakiya W.
Castano Jaime A.
McEnaney Kevin P.
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Someren Robert A. Van
LandOfFree
Intelligent well system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Intelligent well system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Intelligent well system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3577143