Heat exchange – Regenerator – Movable heat storage mass with enclosure
Reexamination Certificate
1998-05-20
2001-09-18
Atkinson, Christopher (Department: 3743)
Heat exchange
Regenerator
Movable heat storage mass with enclosure
C165S010000, C165S054000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06289974
ABSTRACT:
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
Not Applicable
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to heat transfer devices and air filtration devices, and in particular to heat exchangers, ventilators, and enthalpy exchangers along with air filters. The invention is particularly well-suited for air-to-air regenerative heat exchangers utilizing high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter material as the regenerative heat exchanger.
Many individuals suffer from respiratory disorders, including allergies and asthma. In recent decades, scientists have known that poor quality indoor air seriously impacts human health. (American Lung Association, Washington, D.C. 20036, “Residential Air cleaning Devices: Types, Effectiveness and Health Impact”, 1997) Reduction of indoor pollution helps alleviate the suffering of these individuals. Efforts to reduce indoor air pollution have been directed to three areas: ventilation, air cleaning and source control. The problem of providing adequate indoor ventilation is well known.
Modern energy efficient construction employs air “tight” structures to restrict infiltration of outside air. Lack of infiltration or natural ventilation has resulted in inadequate indoor ventilation. Standard 62-1989 of American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air conditioning Engineers Inc. (ASHRAE), Atlanta, Georgia, states, “When infiltration and natural ventilation are insufficient to meet ventilation air requirements, mechanical ventilation shall be provided. The use of energy recovery ventilation systems should be considered for energy conservation purposes in meeting ventilation requirements.” (Sec. 5.1.) Standard 62-1989 suggests 0.35 air changes per hour of continuous fresh air for living areas, but not less than 15 Cubic Feet per Minute (CFM) per person based on design occupancy. For a 2500 square-foot home, this equates to about 120 CFM.
Bringing outside air into a structure for ventilation purpose can be problematic and expensive. Utilizing gas or electric heat to preheat separate ventilation air in winter is inefficient. For example, if the outside air is 20° C. colder than indoors, approximately 1.2 kW of heat is required to preheat the 120 CFM of required ventilation for a 2500 square-foot home. Use of a heat recovery ventilator is by far the most efficient way to ventilate, exchanging as much as 85% of the heat from warm (inside) exhaust air with the cool fresh air. In summer, use of a heat recovery ventilator also reduces air-conditioning load by exchanging cool dry exhaust air with warm humid fresh air. An “enthalpy” exchanger has been found to be particularly effective in humid climates.
Some prior art air-to-air heat exchanger technology for home use utilize a cross-flow heat exchanger core, e.g., Lifebreath™ heat recovery ventilator by Nutech Energy Systems, Inc. of London, Ontario, Canada; TherMax TW Model room ventilators made by Thermax Energy Recycling Ventilation Systems, Division of Kooltronic, Inc. of Hopewell, N.J.; NewAire™ air-to-air heat exchange ventilators made by Altech Energy of Madison, Wis.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,512,392 (Van Ee et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,273,105 (Drake). A disadvantage of these devices is low heat exchanger effectiveness. The best theoretical effectiveness is approximately 70% for a cross-flow core. Practically, these devices only achieve a fraction of that effectiveness.
Other prior art technology includes the use of a rotary heat recovery, wheel, e.g., Honeywell “Perfect Window” System energy recovery ventilator, available from Honeywell, Inc. of Golden Valley, Minnesota. This device employs a rotating regenerative wheel, as well as a fresh air filter and a room air filter. Two types of rotary heat recovery wheels may be used-a desiccant wheel to transfer moisture and also dry heat, or a sensible wheel to transfer only dry heat. (However, as is known in the art, the sensible wheel will transfer moisture when the air drops below the dew point temperature as the air passes through the regenerative wheel.) An advantage of this technology is that high heat exchanger effectiveness is possible. A disadvantage is that it requires an additional moving part, i.e., the regenerative wheel. This regenerative wheel (rotary heat recovery wheel) is approximately 16 inches in diameter for one model. It rotates at about 30 RPM. On one side of the wheel there is outside air. On the other side, there is indoor air. A brush seal is used around the rim of the wheel, and in freezing conditions, warm moist air flowing past the seal will condense and freeze forming frost. If the frost melts, it may migrate to the rim of the wheel and refreeze which can cause the wheel to freeze up. To prevent wheel freeze up, an electric preheater on the incoming air is used to warm the air to 5° F.(−15° C.).
Yet other prior art technology which uses fixed, rotating or reciprocating heat exchanging beds or some method of periodically changing the airflow direction includes U.S. Pat. No. 3,978,912 (Penney et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,049,404 (Johnson); U.S. Pat. No. 4,391,321 (Thunberg); U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,366 (Ekman); U.S. Pat. No. 4,589,476 (Berner); U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,805 (Ekman); U.S. Pat. No. 4,688,626 (Tengesdal); U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,409 (Berner); U.S. Pat. No. 4,754,806 (Astle); U.S. Pat. No. 4,815,522 (Thunberg); U.S. Pat. No. 4,952,283 (Besik); U.S. Pat. No. 5,002,116 (Hoagland et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,050,667 (Berner et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,375,649 (Nilsen et al.) and D. A. Reay, “Heat Recovery Systems”(E.& F.N. Spoon, London, UK, 1979, pp. 17-35).
Another problem with bringing in ventilation air concerns the quality of the fresh air introduced into the room or structure. In many places, allergens, such as, pollen or mold spores, and/or other particulates, such as, soot from vehicle exhaust or emissions from industrial sites, exist in the outside fresh air through much of the year. Thus source control of air-borne pollutants, e.g., controlling the source of the allergens and/or particulates from the incoming fresh air, is important. Filtering these allergens and/or particulates out of the incoming fresh ventilation air is important for individuals subject to respiratory diseases, including severe allergy sufferers or asthma sufferers.
Filtering of the indoor air and trapping of pollutants, particulates and/or allergens generated in the indoor air is also important, since these too can create further respiratory distress. The indoor air generated pollutants, include, but are not limited to, cigarette smoke, pipe smoke, cigar smoke, smoke from the fireplace, organic pollutants, such as gasses from building materials, e.g. particle board, plywood, rugs, paints, varnishes, adhesives, or from cleaning supplies, personal care items, room deodorants, as well as other gases, such as radon, combustion products produced by unvented cooking and heating appliances, and particulates or allergens, such as, but not limited to, animal dander, dust mites, their feces and body parts, insect body parts, indoor molds and fungus, bacteria and viruses, etc.
Air cleaning devices which remove pollutants, allergens and particulates of a certain sizes are shown in the disclosure in the American Lung Association, Washington, D.C. 20036, “Residential Air cleaning Devices: Types, Effectiveness and Health Impact, pages 9-16, 1997, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. This publication discloses that air cleaning devices can be tabletop/console units, portable room air cleaners or central filtration units. The air cleaning devices use mechanical filters, electronic filters, hybrid filters (mechanical/electrostatic) filters, gas phase filters or ozone generators. The mechanical filter is typically a flat filter, a pleated filter, or a High Efficiency Particulate Air filter, having the acronym HEPA.
Use of a pleated filter is also known in the medical airway ventilator art for use as a heat and moisture exchanger, see, PALL™ HME BB100F, PALL BIOMEDICAL, INC., Fajaido, PR. Here a maximum 24 hour usage is r
DeGregoria Anthony J.
Kaminski Thomas J.
Atkinson Christopher
ElasTek, Inc.
Michael & Best & Friedrich LLP
LandOfFree
Integrated heat recovery ventilator HEPA filter using a HEPA... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Integrated heat recovery ventilator HEPA filter using a HEPA..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Integrated heat recovery ventilator HEPA filter using a HEPA... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2514856