Optics: measuring and testing – By alignment in lateral direction
Utility Patent
1999-02-22
2001-01-02
Kim, Robert H. (Department: 2877)
Optics: measuring and testing
By alignment in lateral direction
Utility Patent
active
06169602
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an inspection method for a projection optical system, which requires highly accurate image formation characteristics, for fabricating semiconductor integrated circuits or liquid crystal devices, and also relates to an inspection apparatus for carrying out the inspection method and a projection exposure system provided with the inspection apparatus. The invention is applicable to a stepper type projection exposure apparatus but is particularly suitable for a projection exposure apparatus of the scan exposure type, such as a slit-scan type or step-and-scan type, where patterns of geometric shapes on a mask are serially transferred on a photosensitive substrate while scanning in synchronization the mask and the substrate.
2. Related Background Arts
Projection optical systems, which are mounted, for example, in a projection exposure apparatus for fabricating semiconductor integrated circuits or liquid crystal devices, require extremely high accuracy with respect to image formation characteristics such as projection magnification and image distortion. For this reason, a method for measuring projection magnification and image distortion of the projection optical system with high accuracy and a correction method for correcting the image formation characteristics with high accuracy have been developed. At present, there are roughly two methods for measuring projection magnification and image distortion.
The first method is one which transfers a pattern of a test mask to a photosensitive substrate (e.g., wafer). This method is disclosed, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. Sho 58-8353. In the first method, the test mask pattern is transferred onto a photosensitive substrate, and after the photosensitive substrate is moved a predetermined distance in accordance with a laser interferometer, the pattern is again transferred onto the substrate so that it overlaps with the previously transferred pattern. After development of the substrate, the overlap error or registration error is measured. At this time, since marks overlap one above the other after the photosensitive substrate is moved, the marks are patterns drawn at different places on the test mask.
The second method is one where an image of a pattern formed on a photosensitive substrate is measured directly by a photoelectric sensor without an actual exposure process such as the first method. This second method is disclosed, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication Nos. Sho 59-94032 or Sho 60-18738. Ann example of the second method will be briefly described in reference to FIGS.
1
(
a
) and
1
(
b
).
FIG.
1
(
a
) shows a schematic structure of an example of a conventional projection exposure apparatus. As shown in FIG.
1
(
a
), a test reticle TR as a test mask is provided with a plurality of light transmission portions
305
A to
305
B (in this example, slits) formed at predetermined intervals. Illumination light passes through the light transmission portions
305
A to
305
G and forms an image thereof on the photosensitive substrate side through a projection optical system PL. FIG.
1
(
a
) shows the arrangement of a pattern plate
301
and a photoelectric sensor
302
(both of which are positioned on an image forming position of the light transmission portion
305
A). The pattern plate
301
has a very small light transmission portion
306
which serves as a mark detection device. The photoelectric sensor
302
receives the illumination light from the light transmission portion
306
. The pattern plate
301
and the photoelectric sensor
302
are mounted on a wafer stage, which has the photosensitive substrate mounted thereon and is movable on a plane perpendicular to an optical axis of the projection optical system PL. The position of the wafer stage is precisely measured by a reflector
303
fixed to the wafer stage and an external laser interferometer
304
. The output of the photoelectric sensor
302
varies by scanning the wafer stage.
FIG.
1
(
b
) shows a graph representing the result of the output of the photoelectric sensor
302
. In the figure, the axis of abscissa represents a position x of the scanning direction of the wafer stage, and the axis of ordinate represents an output value I of the photoelectric sensor
302
. The image forming position of the light transmission portion
305
A of the test reticle TR can be measured by obtaining, in FIG.
1
(
b
), a position x
0
where the output value I of an output curve
307
becomes maximum. If a similar measurement is performed with respect to a plurality of light transmission portions of the test reticle TR, the respective image forming positions of the light transmission portions
305
A to
305
G will be obtained. Therefore, the projection magnification and the image distortion of the projection optical system can be obtained because the positions of the light transmission portions
305
A to
305
G are known in advance.
In addition to the aforementioned photoelectric sensor scanning method, there is known a method where an image of a pattern on a reticle is magnified with a microscope and is detected by mean of an image pick-up device, such as two-dimensional CCD, or a method where, conversely, illumination light is emitted from a slit provided on a wafer stage and is received via a pattern of a test reticle TR by scanning the wafer stage (see Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. Sho 63-81818).
The image formation characteristic of the projection optical system, such as magnification or image distortion, is required to be measured and regulated at the time of the manufacture by a projection exposure apparatus. The image formation characteristic also is required to be corrected at the time of actual use, because it varies due to an atmospheric pressure variation and illumination light absorption of a projection optical system. As a countermeasure, a method, where a quantity of the variation of the image formation characteristics are predicted in advance and correction of magnification is performed by varying an air pressure of the projection optical system, is known as disclosed, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication Nos. 60-28613 or Sho 60-78457.
However, this method alone is insufficient and also there is the possibility that magnification and image distortion vary due to long-term fluctuations in a system. Therefore, the system should be used while periodically checking magnification and image distortion by means of methods such as described above. Also, since the demand for accuracy of correction corresponding to an atmospheric pressure variation has become increasingly severe in recent years, it is necessary to frequently check a correction error caused by measurement. In this sense, the aforementioned second method whose measurement time is short is superior to the first method, and in many cases, the second method is actually used.
Also, a step-and-scan projection exposure apparatus, where a mask and each shot area of a photosensitive substrate are scanned in synchronization with respect to a projection optical system in order to substantially increase an exposure area without greatly increasing the size of the projection optical system, has been aimed at in recent years. However, there has been provided no method for measuring an image formation characteristic, which makes use of, in particular, the feature of a projection exposure apparatus of a scan exposure type such as a step-and-scan type.
Thus, all of the aforementioned conventional methods of measuring the magnification or image distortion of the projection optical system are a method of measuring a gap or distance between the projected images of two (or more) different marks on a test mask. For this reason, it is necessary to accurately grasp the mark gap or pitch of the test mask in advance. However, normally the patterns on the mask are fabricated with an electronic beam drawing device, and the gap or pitch between spaced marks for measurement of magnification i
Taniguchi Tetsuo
Tsuji Toshihiko
Armstrong, Westerman Hattori, McLeland & Naughton
Kim Robert H.
Nikon Corporation
Stafira Michael P.
LandOfFree
Inspection method and apparatus for projection optical systems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Inspection method and apparatus for projection optical systems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Inspection method and apparatus for projection optical systems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2526513