Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Micro-organism – per se ; compositions thereof; proces of... – Bacteria or actinomycetales; media therefor
Reexamination Certificate
2005-12-09
2011-10-18
Vogel, Nancy (Department: 1636)
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Micro-organism, per se ; compositions thereof; proces of...
Bacteria or actinomycetales; media therefor
C536S023100
Reexamination Certificate
active
08039243
ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides a bacterium having a genome that is genetically engineered to be smaller than the genome of its native parent strain. A bacterium with a smaller genome can produce a commercial product more efficiently. The present invention also provides methods for deleting genes and other DNA sequences from a bacterial genome. The methods provide precise deletions and seldom introduces mutations to the genomic DNA sequences around the deletion sites. Thus, the methods can be used to generate a series of deletions in a bacterium without increasing the possibility of undesired homologous recombination within the genome. In addition, some of the methods provided by the present invention can also be used for replacing a region of a bacterial genome with a desired DNA sequence.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4851348 (1989-07-01), Hanahan
patent: 4981797 (1991-01-01), Jessee et al.
patent: 5578464 (1996-11-01), Lunn et al.
patent: 5747662 (1998-05-01), Simmons et al.
patent: 5824502 (1998-10-01), Honjo et al.
patent: 5962327 (1999-10-01), Dujon et al.
patent: 6015709 (2000-01-01), Natesan
patent: 6022952 (2000-02-01), Weiner et al.
patent: 6117680 (2000-09-01), Natesan et al.
patent: 6238924 (2001-05-01), Dujon et al.
patent: 6335178 (2002-01-01), Weiner et al.
patent: 6372476 (2002-04-01), Belguith et al.
patent: 6410273 (2002-06-01), Crouzet et al.
patent: 6509156 (2003-01-01), Stewart et al.
patent: 6989265 (2006-01-01), Blattner et al.
patent: 2003/0138937 (2003-07-01), Blattner et al.
patent: 2005/0032225 (2005-02-01), Blattner et al.
patent: 0177343 (1986-04-01), None
patent: 0283726 (1988-09-01), None
patent: WO 88/05821 (1988-08-01), None
patent: WO 96/14408 (1996-05-01), None
patent: WO 01/27258 (2001-04-01), None
patent: WO 02/14495 (2002-02-01), None
patent: WO 03/048374 (2003-06-01), None
patent: WO 03/070880 (2003-08-01), None
patent: WO 2005/087940 (2005-09-01), None
GenBank Accession No. AP009048.
Hall, “Activation of the bgl operon by adaptive mutation,”Mol. Biol. Evol.,15:1-5, 1998.
Riggs , “Expression and Purification of Maltose-Binding Protein Fusions,”Current Protocols Mol. Biol., 16.6.1-16.6.14, John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
Khosla et al., “Expression of Recombinant Proteins inEscherichia ColiUsing an Oxygen-Responsive Promoter,”Bio/Technology, 8:554-558, 1990.
Passoth et al., “Analysis of the hypoxia-induced ADH2 promoter of the respiratory yeastPichia stipitisreveals a new mechanism for sensing of oxygen limitation in yeast,”Yeast, 20:39-51, 2003.
Xu and Tabita, “Positive and negative regulation of sequences upstream of the form II cbb CO2 fixation operon ofRhodobacter sphaeroides,”J. Bacterial., 176:7299-7308, 1994.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/057,582, dated Feb. 25, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/057,582, dated Jan. 13, 2005.
“Restriction Requirement” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/896,739, dated May 16, 2007.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Dec. 27, 2005.
Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Jun. 16, 2006.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Mar. 21, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Jul. 25, 2007.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,914, dated Mar. 9, 2005.
Non-Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,914, dated Jul. 6, 2005.
Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,914, dated Jan. 18, 2007.
Posfai et al., “Emergent properties of reduced-genomeEscherichia coli,” Science, 312:1044-1046, 2002.
Sharma et al., “Recombinant protein production in anEscherichia colireduced genome strain,”Metabolic Engineering, 9:133-141, 2007.
Aristidou et al., “Modification of central metabolic pathway inEscherichia colito reduce acetate accumulation by heterologous expression of theBacillus subtilisacetolactate synthase gene,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44:944-951, 1994.
Asai et al., “AnEscherichia colistrain with all chromosomal rRNA operons inactivated: complete exchange of rRNA genes between bacteria,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 96:1971-1976, 1999.
Balbas, “Understanding the art of producing protein and non-protein molecules inE. coli,” Molec Biotechnol., 19:251-267, 2001.
Baneyx, “Recombinant protein expression inE. coli,” Curr Opin Biotech, 10:411-421, 1999.
Bass et al., “Mulitcopy suppressors of Prc mutangEscherichia coliinclude two HtrA (DegP) protease homologs (HhoAB), DksA, and a truncated RlpA,”Journal of Bacteriology, 178(4):1154-1161, 1996.
Beaulieu et al., “Pathogenic behavior of pectinase-defective Erwinia chrysanthemi mutants on different plants,”MPMI, 6(2):197-202, 1993.
Bermejo et al., “Expression of clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 genes inEscherichia colifor acetone production and acetate detoxification,”Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64:1079-1085, 1998.
Berry et al., “Application of metabolic engineering to improve both production and use of biotech indigo,”J Indust Micro&Biotech, 22:127-133, 2002.
Blattner et al., “The complete genome sequence ofEscherichia coliK-12,”Science, 277:1453-1474, 1997.
Blaudeck et al., “Specificity of single peptide recognition in TAT-dependent bacterial protein translocation,”J. Bacteriology, 183:604-610, 2001.
Chang et al., “Acetate metabolism in a pta mutant ofEscherichia coliW3110: Importance of maintaining acetyl coenzyme a flux for growth and survival,”Journal of Bacteriology, 181:6656-6663, 1999.
Chou et al., “Effect of modified glucose uptake using genetic engineering techniques on high-level recombinant protein production inEscherichia colidense cultures,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering44:953-960, 1994.
Contiero et al., “Effects of mutations in acetate metabolism on high-cell-density growth ofEschrichia coli,”Journal of Industrial Microbiology&Biotechnology, 24:421-430, 2000.
Court et al, “Genetic engineering using homologous recombination,”Annu Rev Genet, 36:361-388, 2002.
Danese et al., “Targeting and assembly of periplasmic and outer-membrane proteins inEscherichia coli,” Annu Rev Genet, 32:59-64, 1998.
Database EMBL, “E.coligenomic DNA, Kohara clone #421(55.1-55.5 min.),” Database Accession No. ECD874.
Datsenko and Wanner, “One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes inEscherichia coliK-12 using PCR products,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97:6640-6645, 2000.
Dedhia et al, “Overproduction of glycogen inEscherichia coliblocked in the acetate pathway improved cell growth,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44:132-139, 1994.
Degryse, “Evaluation ofEscherichia coli recBC sbcBCmutants for cloning by recombination in vivo,”J. Biotechnology, 39:181-187, 1995.
DeLisa et al., “Quorum sensing via AI-2 communicates the metabolic burden associated with heterologous protein production inE. coli,” Biotech Bioeng, 75(4):439-450, 2001.
Diaz-Ricci et aL, “Effects of alteration of the acetic acid synthesis pathway on the fermentation pattern of escherichia coli,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 38:1318-1324, 1991.
Dykstra and Kushner, “Physical characterization of the cloned protease III gene fromEscherichia coliK-12,”Journal of Bacteriology, 163(3):1055-1059, 1985.
Eichhorn et al., “Deletion analysis of theEscherichia colitaurine and alkanesulfonate transport systems,”Journal of Bacteriology, 182(10)2687-2695, 2000.
Farmer and Liao., “Reduction of aerobic acetate production byEscherichia coli,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63:3205-3210, 1997.
Fekkes et al., “Protein targeting to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane,”Microbial. Mol. Biol. Rev
Fulbright & Jaworski
Vogel Nancy
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
LandOfFree
Insertion sequence-free bacteria does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Insertion sequence-free bacteria, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Insertion sequence-free bacteria will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4274637