Insertion sequence-free bacteria

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Micro-organism – per se ; compositions thereof; proces of... – Bacteria or actinomycetales; media therefor

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C536S023100

Reexamination Certificate

active

08039243

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides a bacterium having a genome that is genetically engineered to be smaller than the genome of its native parent strain. A bacterium with a smaller genome can produce a commercial product more efficiently. The present invention also provides methods for deleting genes and other DNA sequences from a bacterial genome. The methods provide precise deletions and seldom introduces mutations to the genomic DNA sequences around the deletion sites. Thus, the methods can be used to generate a series of deletions in a bacterium without increasing the possibility of undesired homologous recombination within the genome. In addition, some of the methods provided by the present invention can also be used for replacing a region of a bacterial genome with a desired DNA sequence.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4851348 (1989-07-01), Hanahan
patent: 4981797 (1991-01-01), Jessee et al.
patent: 5578464 (1996-11-01), Lunn et al.
patent: 5747662 (1998-05-01), Simmons et al.
patent: 5824502 (1998-10-01), Honjo et al.
patent: 5962327 (1999-10-01), Dujon et al.
patent: 6015709 (2000-01-01), Natesan
patent: 6022952 (2000-02-01), Weiner et al.
patent: 6117680 (2000-09-01), Natesan et al.
patent: 6238924 (2001-05-01), Dujon et al.
patent: 6335178 (2002-01-01), Weiner et al.
patent: 6372476 (2002-04-01), Belguith et al.
patent: 6410273 (2002-06-01), Crouzet et al.
patent: 6509156 (2003-01-01), Stewart et al.
patent: 6989265 (2006-01-01), Blattner et al.
patent: 2003/0138937 (2003-07-01), Blattner et al.
patent: 2005/0032225 (2005-02-01), Blattner et al.
patent: 0177343 (1986-04-01), None
patent: 0283726 (1988-09-01), None
patent: WO 88/05821 (1988-08-01), None
patent: WO 96/14408 (1996-05-01), None
patent: WO 01/27258 (2001-04-01), None
patent: WO 02/14495 (2002-02-01), None
patent: WO 03/048374 (2003-06-01), None
patent: WO 03/070880 (2003-08-01), None
patent: WO 2005/087940 (2005-09-01), None
GenBank Accession No. AP009048.
Hall, “Activation of the bgl operon by adaptive mutation,”Mol. Biol. Evol.,15:1-5, 1998.
Riggs , “Expression and Purification of Maltose-Binding Protein Fusions,”Current Protocols Mol. Biol., 16.6.1-16.6.14, John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
Khosla et al., “Expression of Recombinant Proteins inEscherichia ColiUsing an Oxygen-Responsive Promoter,”Bio/Technology, 8:554-558, 1990.
Passoth et al., “Analysis of the hypoxia-induced ADH2 promoter of the respiratory yeastPichia stipitisreveals a new mechanism for sensing of oxygen limitation in yeast,”Yeast, 20:39-51, 2003.
Xu and Tabita, “Positive and negative regulation of sequences upstream of the form II cbb CO2 fixation operon ofRhodobacter sphaeroides,”J. Bacterial., 176:7299-7308, 1994.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/057,582, dated Feb. 25, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/057,582, dated Jan. 13, 2005.
“Restriction Requirement” issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/896,739, dated May 16, 2007.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Dec. 27, 2005.
Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Jun. 16, 2006.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Mar. 21, 2007.
Non-Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/173,900, dated Jul. 25, 2007.
Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,914, dated Mar. 9, 2005.
Non-Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,914, dated Jul. 6, 2005.
Final Office Action Communication issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,914, dated Jan. 18, 2007.
Posfai et al., “Emergent properties of reduced-genomeEscherichia coli,” Science, 312:1044-1046, 2002.
Sharma et al., “Recombinant protein production in anEscherichia colireduced genome strain,”Metabolic Engineering, 9:133-141, 2007.
Aristidou et al., “Modification of central metabolic pathway inEscherichia colito reduce acetate accumulation by heterologous expression of theBacillus subtilisacetolactate synthase gene,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44:944-951, 1994.
Asai et al., “AnEscherichia colistrain with all chromosomal rRNA operons inactivated: complete exchange of rRNA genes between bacteria,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 96:1971-1976, 1999.
Balbas, “Understanding the art of producing protein and non-protein molecules inE. coli,” Molec Biotechnol., 19:251-267, 2001.
Baneyx, “Recombinant protein expression inE. coli,” Curr Opin Biotech, 10:411-421, 1999.
Bass et al., “Mulitcopy suppressors of Prc mutangEscherichia coliinclude two HtrA (DegP) protease homologs (HhoAB), DksA, and a truncated RlpA,”Journal of Bacteriology, 178(4):1154-1161, 1996.
Beaulieu et al., “Pathogenic behavior of pectinase-defective Erwinia chrysanthemi mutants on different plants,”MPMI, 6(2):197-202, 1993.
Bermejo et al., “Expression of clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 genes inEscherichia colifor acetone production and acetate detoxification,”Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64:1079-1085, 1998.
Berry et al., “Application of metabolic engineering to improve both production and use of biotech indigo,”J Indust Micro&Biotech, 22:127-133, 2002.
Blattner et al., “The complete genome sequence ofEscherichia coliK-12,”Science, 277:1453-1474, 1997.
Blaudeck et al., “Specificity of single peptide recognition in TAT-dependent bacterial protein translocation,”J. Bacteriology, 183:604-610, 2001.
Chang et al., “Acetate metabolism in a pta mutant ofEscherichia coliW3110: Importance of maintaining acetyl coenzyme a flux for growth and survival,”Journal of Bacteriology, 181:6656-6663, 1999.
Chou et al., “Effect of modified glucose uptake using genetic engineering techniques on high-level recombinant protein production inEscherichia colidense cultures,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering44:953-960, 1994.
Contiero et al., “Effects of mutations in acetate metabolism on high-cell-density growth ofEschrichia coli,”Journal of Industrial Microbiology&Biotechnology, 24:421-430, 2000.
Court et al, “Genetic engineering using homologous recombination,”Annu Rev Genet, 36:361-388, 2002.
Danese et al., “Targeting and assembly of periplasmic and outer-membrane proteins inEscherichia coli,” Annu Rev Genet, 32:59-64, 1998.
Database EMBL, “E.coligenomic DNA, Kohara clone #421(55.1-55.5 min.),” Database Accession No. ECD874.
Datsenko and Wanner, “One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes inEscherichia coliK-12 using PCR products,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97:6640-6645, 2000.
Dedhia et al, “Overproduction of glycogen inEscherichia coliblocked in the acetate pathway improved cell growth,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44:132-139, 1994.
Degryse, “Evaluation ofEscherichia coli recBC sbcBCmutants for cloning by recombination in vivo,”J. Biotechnology, 39:181-187, 1995.
DeLisa et al., “Quorum sensing via AI-2 communicates the metabolic burden associated with heterologous protein production inE. coli,” Biotech Bioeng, 75(4):439-450, 2001.
Diaz-Ricci et aL, “Effects of alteration of the acetic acid synthesis pathway on the fermentation pattern of escherichia coli,”Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 38:1318-1324, 1991.
Dykstra and Kushner, “Physical characterization of the cloned protease III gene fromEscherichia coliK-12,”Journal of Bacteriology, 163(3):1055-1059, 1985.
Eichhorn et al., “Deletion analysis of theEscherichia colitaurine and alkanesulfonate transport systems,”Journal of Bacteriology, 182(10)2687-2695, 2000.
Farmer and Liao., “Reduction of aerobic acetate production byEscherichia coli,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63:3205-3210, 1997.
Fekkes et al., “Protein targeting to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane,”Microbial. Mol. Biol. Rev

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Insertion sequence-free bacteria does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Insertion sequence-free bacteria, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Insertion sequence-free bacteria will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4274637

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.