Ink droplet ejecting method and apparatus

Incremental printing of symbolic information – Ink jet – Controller

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C347S010000, C347S009000, C347S011000, C347S014000, C347S069000, C347S068000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06257686

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an ink droplet ejecting method and apparatus of an ink jet printhead.
2. Description of Related Art
According to a known ink jet printer using an ink jet printhead, the volume of an ink flow path is changed by deformation of a piezoelectric ceramic material, and when the flow path volume decreases, the ink present in the ink flow path is ejected as a droplet from a nozzle, while when the flow path volume increases, ink is introduced into the ink flow path from an ink inlet. In this type of printing head, a plurality of ink chambers are formed by partition walls of a piezoelectric ceramic material, and ink supply means, such as ink cartridges, are connected to one end of each ink chamber of the plurality of ink chambers, while at the opposite end of each of the ink chambers is an ink ejecting nozzle (hereinafter referred to simply as “nozzle” or “nozzles”). The partition walls are deformed in accordance with printing data to make the ink chambers smaller in volume, whereby ink droplets are ejected onto a printing medium from the nozzles to print, for example, a character or a figure.
As this type of an ink jet printer, a drop-on-demand type ink jet printer which ejects ink droplets is popular because of a high ejection efficiency and a low running cost. As an example of the drop-on-demand type there is known a shear mode type using a piezoelectric material, as is disclosed in Japanese Published Unexamined Patent Application No. Sho 63-247051.
As shown in
FIGS. 12A-13
, (which are also applicable to the instant invention), this type of an ink droplet ejecting apparatus
600
comprises a bottom wall
601
, a top wall
602
and shear mode actuator walls
603
located therebetween. The actuator walls
603
each comprise a lower wall
607
bonded to the bottom wall
601
and polarized in the direction of arrow
611
and an upper wall
605
formed of a piezoelectric material, the upper wall
605
being bonded to the top wall
602
and polarized in the direction of arrow
609
. Adjacent actuator walls
603
, in a pair, define an ink chamber
613
therebetween, and next adjacent actuator walls
603
, in a pair, define a space
615
which is narrower than the ink chamber
613
.
A nozzle plate
617
(
FIG. 12B
) having nozzles
618
is fixed to one end of the ink chambers
613
, while to the opposite end of the ink chambers is connected an ink supply source (not shown). On both side faces of each actuator wall
603
are formed electrodes
619
,
621
, respectively, as metallized layers. More specifically, the electrode
619
is formed on the actuator wall
603
on the side of the ink chamber
613
, while the electrode
621
is formed on the actuator wall
603
on the side of the space
615
. The surface of the electrode
619
is covered with an insulating layer
630
for insulation from the ink. The electrode
621
which faces the space
615
is connected to a ground
623
, and the electrode
619
provided in each ink chamber
613
is connected to a controller
625
which provides an actuator drive signal to the electrode.
The controller
625
applies a voltage to the electrode
619
in each ink chamber, whereby the associated actuator walls
603
undergo a piezoelectric thickness slip deformation in directions to increase the volume of the ink chamber
613
. For example, as shown in
FIG. 13
, when voltage E(V) is applied to an electrode
619
c
in an ink chamber
613
c,
electric fields are generated in the directions of arrows
629
,
631
and
630
,
632
respectively in actuator walls
603
e
and
603
f
, so that the actuator walls
603
e
and
603
f
undergo a piezoelectric thickness slip deformation in directions to increase the volume of the ink chamber
613
c
. At this time, the internal pressure of the ink chamber
613
c
, including a nozzle
618
c
and the vicinity thereof, decreases. The applied state of the voltage E(V) is maintained for only a one-way propagation time T of a pressure wave in the ink chamber
613
c
. During this period, ink is supplied from the ink supply source.
The one-way propagation time T is a time required for the pressure wave in the ink chamber
613
to propagate longitudinally through the ink chamber. Given that the length of the ink chamber
613
is L and the velocity of sound in the ink present in the ink chamber
613
is a, the time T is determined to be T=L/a.
According to the theory of pressure wave propagation, upon the lapse of time T, or an odd-multiple time thereof, after the above application of voltage, the internal pressure of the ink chamber
613
c
reverses into a positive pressure. In conformity with this timing, the voltage being applied to the electrode
619
c
in the ink chamber
613
c
is returned to 0 (V). As a result, the actuator walls
603
e
and
603
f
revert to their original state (
FIG. 13
) before the deformation, whereby a pressure is applied to the ink. At this time, the above positive pressure and the pressure developed by reverting of the actuator walls
603
e
and
603
f
to their original state before the deformation are added together to afford a relatively high pressure in the vicinity of the nozzle
618
c
in the ink chamber
613
c
, whereby an ink droplet is ejected from the nozzle
618
c.
An ink supply passage
626
communicating with the ink chamber
613
is formed by members
627
,
628
.
Heretofore, in this type of an ink droplet ejecting apparatus
600
, when jet pulses (an optimum pulse width is an odd-multiple value of T) are applied to an actuator continuously at a predetermined frequency to effect a continuous dot printing and when the continuous dot printing is followed by, for example, a one-dot rest and subsequent input of the next dot printing instruction, the ink droplet speed and the direction of droplet ejection become unstable at the portion of the printing instruction under the influence of remaining meniscus oscillation of the ink present in the nozzle concerned, thus giving rise to the problem that a printing line is curved or thinned at that portion, resulting in deterioration of the print quality.
In the case where an ink droplet of a small volume is to be ejected for enhancing the printing resolution, it has been proposed to add, for one dot, a non-jet pulse after application of a jet pulse and before completion of ink ejection. In this case, the remaining meniscus oscillation is suppressed and the ejection of ink becomes stable in a continuous dot printing, but there arises the problem that the energy efficiency is low because it is necessary to continue adding the non-jet pulse. In both cases noted above, the printing instruction is issued without considering whether there is ejection of ink just before and just after the dot concerned.
Now, with reference to
FIGS. 1A
,
1
B and
FIGS. 2 and 3
, a description will be given of results obtained by conducting two printing operations and actually measuring ink droplet ejecting speeds.
FIG. 1A
shows a jet pulse signal A (designated the first driving waveform) of pulse width 1 T for one dot and
FIG. 1B
shows the jet pulse signal A of pulse width 1 T for one dot and a non-jet additional pulse signal B (both designated the second driving waveform). In this case, a time difference between a fall timing of the jet pulse signal A and a rise timing of the additional pulse signal B is set at 2.25 T and that the pulse width of the additional pulse signal B is set at 0.5 T. Here there was used a certain waveform (the first or the second driving waveform) irrespective of whether there is ejection of ink. Table 1 below shows measurement data on the ink droplet ejecting speed (m/s) obtained by a continuous dot printing (1~5) with use of each driving waveform, subsequent one-dot rest (6) and subsequent two-dot printing (7, 8). Printing frequency was set at 10.0 kHz. As is seen from Table 1, the ink droplet ejecting speed greatly decreases at the second dot (8) after the rest which follows the continuous printing using the first driving waveform.
TABLE 1
DRIVING
D

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Ink droplet ejecting method and apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Ink droplet ejecting method and apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ink droplet ejecting method and apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2463718

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.