Injectable opioid partial agonist or opioid antagonist...

Details Injectable opioid partial agonist or opioid antagonist... Injectable opioid partial agonist or opioid antagonist...

2000-08-25

2002-12-17

Spear, James M. (Department: 1615)

Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions

Preparations characterized by special physical form

Implant or insert

C424S423000, C424S489000, C514S772300, C514S781000, C514S811000, C514S812000, C514S951000, C514S952000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06495155

ABSTRACT:

INTRODUCTION
Background
The disease of substance abuse remains a scourge on society. As it becomes more evident that there is a substantial genetic contribution to becoming addicted, helping addicted individuals to terminate their dependency or at least achieve a level of becoming a functional member of society, rather than treating substance abuse as a moral issue, has become increasingly accepted policy. Various programs have been put in place in the public and private sectors. In the private sectors, there are such organizations as Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous, which play an important role in psycho-social support. In addition there are many private clinics which serve to provide both psycho-social support and medicinal support, using the somewhat limited repertoire of drugs which are available. In the public arena, there are the extensive programs to bring to the attention of young people and parents the hazards of substance abuse and discourage the young people from embarking on drug use. Also, there are the methadone programs, which are primarily public supported.
The number of substance abusing subjects in the United States is quite staggering. There are estimated to be about 15 million people who abuse alcohol, about 1.3 million who abuse cocaine in its many manifestations, about 0.8 million who abuse amphetamines and about 0.5-0.8 million who abuse heroin, in addition to the use of other drugs, such as the psychedelic drugs. Efforts to reduce the numbers of scheduled substances and alcohol users have been continuous and relatively unavailing. Those subjects who have entered programs have had a dismal record of relapse, so that only a small proportion of the people who do enter programs and are retained in the programs remain clean long after the completion of the program.
One significant factor in lack of retention and relapse is compliance. A repetitive act, such as taking a pill daily, is not a simple matter, even where the subject has no qualms about taking the pill. With the substance abuser, who may have physiological and emotional needs for the abused substance, the sustaining of the therapeutic routine is substantially more difficult. Therapeutic techniques, which require perseverance on the part of the subject, decrease the likelihood of success of the treatment. It is therefore of great importance to be able to reduce the level of involvement of the subject where medicinal treatments are involved, particularly treatments which may involve frequent scheduling, monitoring of compliance, and sustaining a particular regimen.
In order to reduce the vicissitudes of compliance, there have been efforts to provide sustained-release methodologies. These have involved pumps, patches, depots and the like. Where the release implement is accessible to the subject, there is always the temptation to remove the implement during a craving episode. This opportunity, which may be an indication of will power, nevertheless, puts the subject at risk who succumbs to the temptation. By providing for a slow-release medicament which is introduced into the body, the temptation is avoided and the drug is released in accordance with a predetermined schedule over an arranged period of time. One can have implantable rods which are introduced surgically or microparticles which are injectable. Rods or microparticles can be devised to release the drug over an extended period of time in a controlled manner.
Microcapsules and microspheres are usually powders consisting of spherical particles 2 mm or less in diameter, usually 500 &mgr;m or less in diameter. If the particles are less than 1 &mgr;m, they are often referred to as nanocapsules or nanospheres. For the most part, the difference between microcapsules and nanocapsules or the difference between microspheres and nanospheres is their size.
A microcapsule or nanocapsule has its encapsulated material (hereinafter referred to as agent) centrally located within a unique membrane, usually a polymeric membrane. This membrane may be termed a wall-forming membrane, and is usually a polymeric material. Because of their internal structure, permeable microcapsules designed for controlled-release applications release their agent at a constant rate (zero-order rate of release). Also, impermeable microcapsules can be used for rupture-release applications. A microsphere has its agent dispersed throughout the particle; that is, the internal structure is a matrix of the agent and excipient, usually a polymeric excipient. Usually, controlled-release microspheres release their agent at a declining rate (first-order). But microspheres can be designed to release agents at a near zero-order rate. Microspheres tend to be more difficult to rupture as compared to microcapsules because their internal structure is stronger. Hereinafter, the term microparticles will include nanospheres, microspheres, microcapsules, nanocapsules, microbubbles (hollow particles), porous microbubbles, nanoparticles, microsponges (porous microspheres) and particles in general.
Various slow-release microparticles have been developed for a variety of drugs, but very few have been commercialized. There are many constraints on a satisfactory slow-release injectable formulation: the release of the drug must be over an extended period of time; during the time of treatment, the level of drug maintained in the subject must be an effective level, without reaching any hazardous level; the drug must be released slowly without a catastrophic dumping of the drug; the polymeric excipient used for the microparticles must be biodegradable and biocompatible; any residual chemicals must be below the maximum acceptable level; the microparticles must be small and capable of being administered by a syringe with a needle size which is acceptable to patients; the results must be reproducible, which requires that the process can be accurately controlled and is not unduly sensitive to minor changes in conditions; the injectable formulation must be sterile; and must have other characteristics which may be general or specific to the particular medicament. The properties of the microparticles are sensitive to many properties of the drug and excipient, as well as the selection of the process and the conditions under which the microparticles are prepared and subsequently processed.
Relevant Literature
Buprenorphine (N-cyclopropylmethyl-7-[1-(s)-hydroxy-1,2,2-trimethylpropyl]-6,14-endoethano-6,7,8,14-tetrahydronororipavine) is reported as effective in the treatment of opiate addiction using sublingual administration (U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,428). Nasal administration of buprenorphine is reported in U.S. Pat. No. 4,464,378. Long-acting drug antagonists are reported in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,716,631 and 5,858,388. The use of buprenorphine for the treatment of drug dependence has been reported in numerous publications. Kuhlman et al.,
Addiction
1998 93:549-59; Schottenfeld et al.,
Arch Gen. Psychiatry
1997, 54:713-20; Strain et al., J. Clin. Psychopharmacol 1996, 16:58-67; are illustrative of a few of the reports. The combination of buprenorphine and naloxone is reported in O'Connor et al.,
Ann. Intern Med.
1997, 127: 526-30.
Krantzler, et al.,
Alcoholism:Clin and Exp Res
1998, 22:1074-1079 report the treatment of alcoholics with a slow-release naltrexone particle injectable formulation. A number of studies were carried out by Reuning's laboratory concerning naltrexone and its use in a slow-release form: Reuning, et al., NIDA Re: Monograph Series, January 1976, (4) p43-5; Reuning et al.,
J. Pharmacokinet Biopharm
, August 1983, 11(4), p369-87; Reuning, et al.,
Drug Metab Dispos
November-December 1989, 17(6) p583-9; MacGregor et al.,
J. Pharm Pharmacol
, January 1983, 35(1) p38-42; Reuning et al., NIDA Res Monograph Series 1980, 28, p172-84. See also, Schwope et al., NIDA Res Monograph Series, 1975, (4), p13-8; Yolles et al.,
J. Pharm Sci
February 1975, 64(2) p348-9; Thies, NIDA Res Monograph Series, 1975 (4), p19-20; Schwope et al., NIDA Res Monograph Series, January 1976, 4, p13-1

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Injectable opioid partial agonist or opioid antagonist... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Injectable opioid partial agonist or opioid antagonist..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Injectable opioid partial agonist or opioid antagonist... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2986345