Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Product assembly or manufacturing
Reexamination Certificate
1999-01-21
2002-12-03
Black, Thomas (Department: 2121)
Data processing: generic control systems or specific application
Specific application, apparatus or process
Product assembly or manufacturing
C700S105000, C700S108000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06490493
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to industrial process control systems and more specifically to software used to assist industrial process engineers with specifying and managing process devices.
Industrial processes often involve a material such as a fluid moving through pipes and tanks to transform less valuable materials into more valuable and useful products such as petroleum, chemicals, paper, and food. For example an oil refinery can process crude oil into gasoline, fuel oil, and other petrochemicals. Industrial process control systems use process devices such as measurement instruments known as transmitters for sensing and measuring process parameters such as pressure, flow, temperature, and level along with control devices such as valves, pumps and motors to control the flow of process materials.
When process plants are designed, process requirements are identified for specific points in the process plant, known as Tags, for process devices to measure or control the process. Usually an engineer will evaluate process requirements in order to specify a particular process device. Design engineers specifying process devices for a process plant evaluate process requirements using a variety of computer programs including 3-D modeling and process studies by simulating PID control functions, calculators, and process device manufacturer catalogs to make technology decisions and specify complex specific process devices. Complex process devices have billions of manufacturing combinations that result from the many technology decisions made by design engineers or mandated by the manufacturer, for example, a Rosemount® model 3051 with remote seals has over four billion potential manufacturing combinations. Once the process device is specified, the process device must be ordered which is usually yet another task for a design or procurement engineer. This procedure often involves reentry of the data by the design engineer and is time consuming, expensive, and error prone.
When the specified process device arrives at the process plant it is not uncommon that the built process device is slightly different from the ordered process device due to the large number of potential manufacturing combinations or to the fact that process data has changed. The differences between the ordered process device and the built process device are evaluated by inspecting the built process device and comparing it against the specification of the ordered process device. A manual comparison is often time consuming, expensive and error prone.
In the event a process device fails and requires replacement, a process plant engineer will likely need to order an identical replacement process device. To ensure the replacement process device is identical, the process plant engineer will likely need to locate the specification sheet for the process device, determine if differences in the built process device should be incorporated into the replacement process device, and then send the specification information to the process device manufacturer. This reorder procedure for a replacement process device is time consuming, expensive, and error prone. Further, in the event that the process data has changed, the engineer will need to reevaluate the instrument specification.
For the foregoing reasons, there is a need for software that simplifies the design engineer's specification and ordering process. There is also a need for software to automate the comparison between ordered process devices and built process devices to simplify process plant decisions concerning built process devices. Finally, there is a need for software that simplifies reordering a process device when a replacement process device is required.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is directed to an apparatus, method, and medium readable by a computer processor that satisfies the need for software to simplify specification of process devices and management of built process devices. Aspects of software having features of the invention include the following sequences of instructions: device requirement instructions that receive process requirements to define the operating requirements for a process device; device performance instructions that provide performance of the device of the stated condition, device selection instructions that evaluate the process requirements against predetermined process device data and define a specified process device meeting the process requirements; device order instructions that place the specified process device into an ordered database that can be sent to a process device manufacturer to initiate building of the specified process device; device evaluation instructions that evaluate a built process device to obtain built process device data representing the built process device's performance characteristics; and device management instructions that use the built process device data to create a built database to make decisions regarding the built process device.
In one embodiment of the invention, device comparison instructions compare the ordered database with the built database stored in memory to create a discrepancy database that is used to determine whether the built process device meets process requirements.
In another embodiment of the invention, device maintenance instructions receive a request for a replacement built process device, recall the built process device data from the built database and order a replacement built process device from the process device manufacturer.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4047003 (1977-09-01), LaRocca et al.
patent: 4096566 (1978-06-01), Borie et al.
patent: 4517637 (1985-05-01), Cassell
patent: 4598381 (1986-07-01), Cucci
patent: 4602343 (1986-07-01), Dougherty
patent: 4628437 (1986-12-01), Poschmann et al.
patent: 4648064 (1987-03-01), Morley
patent: 4663704 (1987-05-01), Jones et al.
patent: 4672529 (1987-06-01), Kupersmit
patent: 4680753 (1987-07-01), Fulton et al.
patent: 4774656 (1988-09-01), Quatse et al.
patent: 4777584 (1988-10-01), Pogue
patent: 4796194 (1989-01-01), Atherton
patent: 4864489 (1989-09-01), Yasuhara et al.
patent: 4910658 (1990-03-01), Dudash et al.
patent: 4910691 (1990-03-01), Skeirik
patent: 4918690 (1990-04-01), Markkula, Jr. et al.
patent: 4965742 (1990-10-01), Skeirik
patent: 4965880 (1990-10-01), Petitjean
patent: 5068778 (1991-11-01), Kosem et al.
patent: 5095417 (1992-03-01), Hagiwara et al.
patent: 5095755 (1992-03-01), Peterson
patent: 5122948 (1992-06-01), Zapolin
patent: 5134574 (1992-07-01), Beaverstock et al.
patent: 5146401 (1992-09-01), Bansal et al.
patent: 5168441 (1992-12-01), Onarheim et al.
patent: 5179701 (1993-01-01), Chisholm
patent: 5247450 (1993-09-01), Clark
patent: 5265005 (1993-11-01), Schmidt et al.
patent: 5289365 (1994-02-01), Caldwell et al.
patent: 5307346 (1994-04-01), Fieldhouse
patent: 5307491 (1994-04-01), Feriozi et al.
patent: 5311451 (1994-05-01), Barrett
patent: 5319541 (1994-06-01), Blanchard et al.
patent: 5319751 (1994-06-01), Garney
patent: 5333114 (1994-07-01), Warrior et al.
patent: 5365423 (1994-11-01), Chand
patent: 5412643 (1995-05-01), Kogure
patent: 5432711 (1995-07-01), Jackson et al.
patent: 5442639 (1995-08-01), Crowder et al.
patent: 5444851 (1995-08-01), Woest
patent: 5459867 (1995-10-01), Adams et al.
patent: 5465364 (1995-11-01), Lathrop et al.
patent: 5475856 (1995-12-01), Kogge
patent: 5481741 (1996-01-01), McKaskle et al.
patent: 5485400 (1996-01-01), Warrior et al.
patent: 5485620 (1996-01-01), Sadre et al.
patent: 5486998 (1996-01-01), Corso
patent: 5493534 (1996-02-01), Mok
patent: 5497316 (1996-03-01), Sierk et al.
patent: 5513095 (1996-04-01), Pajonk
patent: 5529490 (1996-06-01), Klein et al.
patent: 5530643 (1996-06-01), Hodorowski
patent: 5549137 (1996-08-01), Lenz et al.
patent: 5550746 (1996-08-01), Jacobs
patent: 5550980 (1996-08-01), Pascucci et al.
patent: 5566320 (1996-10-01), Hubert
patent: 5576946 (1996-11-01), Bender et al.
patent: 5586324 (1996-12-01), Sato et al.
patent: 5597995 (1997-01-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5598344 (1997-01-01), Dangelo et al.
p
Black Thomas
Hartman Jr. Ronald D
Rosemount Inc.
Westman Champlin & Kelly
LandOfFree
Industrial process device management software does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Industrial process device management software, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Industrial process device management software will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2968202