Electricity: measuring and testing – Of geophysical surface or subsurface in situ – With radiant energy or nonconductive-type transmitter
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-10
2003-04-29
Strecker, Gerard R. (Department: 2862)
Electricity: measuring and testing
Of geophysical surface or subsurface in situ
With radiant energy or nonconductive-type transmitter
C702S007000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06556016
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to the measurement of electrical characteristics of formations surrounding a wellbore. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method for determining the dip angle of an earth formation.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
The basic principles and techniques for electromagnetic logging for earth formations are well known. Induction logging to determine the resistivity (or its inverse, conductivity) of earth formations adjacent a borehole, for example, has long been a standard and important technique in the search for and recovery of subterranean petroleum deposits. In brief, the measurements are made by inducing eddy currents to flow in the formations in response to an AC transmitter signal, and then measuring the appropriate characteristics of a receiver signal generated by the formation eddy currents. The formation properties identified by these signals are then recorded in a log at the surface as a function of the depth of the tool in the borehole.
It is well known that subterranean formations surrounding an earth borehole may be anisotropic with regard to the conduction of electrical currents. The phenomenon of electrical anisotropy is generally a consequence of either microscopic or macroscopic geometry, or a combination thereof, as follows.
In many sedimentary strata, electrical current flows more easily in a direction parallel to the bedding planes, as opposed to a direction perpendicular to the bedding planes. One reason is that a great number of mineral crystals possess a flat or elongated shape (e.g., mica or kaolin). At the time they were laid down, they naturally took on an orientation parallel to the plane of sedimentation. The interstices in the formations are, therefore, generally parallel to the bedding plane, and the current is able to easily travel along these interstices which often contain electrically conductive mineralized water. Such electrical anisotropy, sometimes call microscopic anisotropy, is observed mostly in shales.
Subterranean formations are often made up of a series of relatively thin beds having different lithological characteristics and, therefore different resistivities. In well logging systems, the distances between the electrodes or antennae are great enough that the volume involved in a measurement may include several such thin beds. When individual layers are neither delineated nor resolved by a logging tool, the tool responds to the formation as if it were a macroscopically anisotropic formation. A thinly laminated sand/shale sequence is a particularly important example of a macroscopically anisotropic formation.
If a sample is cut from a subterranean formation, the resistivity of the sample measured with current flowing parallel to the bedding planes is called the transverse or horizontal resistivity &rgr;
H
. The inverse of &rgr;
H
is the horizontal conductivity &sgr;
H
. The resistivity of the sample measured with a current flowing perpendicular to the bedding plane is called the longitudinal or vertical resistivity, &rgr;
v
, and its inverse the vertical conductivity &sgr;
v
. The anisotropy coefficient &lgr; is defined as
λ
=
σ
H
σ
V
.
In situations where the borehole intersects the formation substantially perpendicular to the bedding planes, conventional induction and propagation well logging tools are sensitive almost exclusively to the horizontal component of the formation resistivity. When the borehole intersects the bedding planes at an angle (a deviated borehole) the tool readings contain an influence from the vertical and horizontal resistivities. This is particularly true when the angle between the borehole and the normal to the bedding places is large, such as in directional or horizontal drilling, where angles near 90° are commonly encountered. In these situations, the influence of vertical resistivity can cause discrepancies between measurements taken in the same formation in nearby vertical wells, thereby preventing a useful comparison of these measurements. In addition, since reservoir evaluation is typically based on data obtained from vertical wells, the use of data from wells drilled at high angles may produce erroneous estimates of formation reserve, producibility, etc. if proper account is not taken of the anisotropy effect and the dip of the bedding layers.
There have been proposed a number of methods to determine vertical and horizontal resistivity near a deviated borehole. Hagiwara (U.S. Pat. No. 5,966,013) disclosed a method of determining certain anisotropic properties of formation using propagation tool without a priori knowledge of the dip angle. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,886,526, Wu described a method of determining anisotropic properties of anisotropic earth formations using a multi-spacing induction tool with assumed functional dependence between dielectric constants of the formation and its horizontal and vertical resistivity. Gupta et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,883) utilized a triad induction tool to arrive at an approximate initial guess for the anisotropic formation parameters. Moran and Gianzero (Geophysics, Vol. 44, P. 1266, 1979) proposed using a tri-axial tool of zero spacing to determine dip angle. Later the spacing was extended to finite size by Gianzero et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,115,198) using a pulsed induction tool. An iterative method was used in Gao et al. (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/583,184, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,393,364). The above references are incorporated herein by reference. These attempts to determine vertical and horizontal resistivity around a deviated borehole and/or the dip angle of the formation have not provided sufficient accuracy. A new technique is therefore needed.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3060373 (1962-10-01), Doll
patent: 3510757 (1970-05-01), Huston
patent: 4251773 (1981-02-01), Cailliau et al.
patent: 4277750 (1981-07-01), Bonnet et al.
patent: 4857852 (1989-08-01), Kleinberg et al.
patent: 4972150 (1990-11-01), Tabbagh
patent: 4980643 (1990-12-01), Gianzero et al.
patent: 5115198 (1992-05-01), Gianzero et al.
patent: 5329448 (1994-07-01), Rosthal
patent: 5757191 (1998-05-01), Gianzero
patent: 5886526 (1999-03-01), Wu
patent: 5966013 (1999-10-01), Hagiwara
patent: 5999883 (1999-12-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 6181138 (2001-01-01), Hagiwara et al.
patent: 6304086 (2001-10-01), Minerbo et al.
patent: 6393364 (2002-05-01), Gao et al.
Method For Iterative Determination Of Conductivity In Anisotropic Dipping Formations, Li Gao et al., Ser. No. 09/583,184, filed May 30, 2000.
Virtual Steering Of Induction Tool For Determination Of Formation Dip Angle, Li Gao et al., Ser. No. 09/925,997, filed Aug. 9, 2001.
Method and Apparatus Using Toroidal Antennas To Measure Electrical Anisotropy, Stanley C. Gianzero, Ser. No. 60/302,823, filed Jul. 3, 2001.
Gao Li
Gianzero Stanley C.
SanMartin Luis
Conley & Rose, P.C.
Halliburton Energy Service,s Inc.
Strecker Gerard R.
LandOfFree
Induction method for determining dip angle in subterranean... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Induction method for determining dip angle in subterranean..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Induction method for determining dip angle in subterranean... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3100430