Communications: radio wave antennas – Antennas – Microstrip
Reexamination Certificate
2000-10-13
2002-09-10
Ho, Tan (Department: 2821)
Communications: radio wave antennas
Antennas
Microstrip
C343S853000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06448930
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In conventional cellular and PCS (personal communications system) wireless systems, signals transmitted from a base station (cell site) to a user (remoter terminal) are usually received via an omni-directional antenna; often in the form of a stub antenna. These systems often sacrifice bandwidth to obtain better area coverage, stemming from the result of less than desirable signal propagation characteristics. For instance, the bit (binary digit) to Hz ratio of the typical digital Cellular or PCS system is often less than 0.5. Lower binary signal modulation types, such as BPSK (Binary Phase Shift Keying) are used, since the effective SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) or C/I (Carrier to Interference Ratio) are often as low as 20 dB. In fact, for voice based signaling, the threshold C/I (or S/N) ratio for adequate quality reception of the signal is about 17 dB.
For wireless systems directed towards data applications, it is desirable to significantly increase the SNR or C/I in order to employ higher order (binary) modulation techniques, such as QAM-64 (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation, with 64 points in the complex constellation). These higher order modulation schemes require substantially greater C/I (or SNR) thresholds; typically higher than 26 dB. For the case of MMDS (multi-user multipath distribution system) signals, where the carrier frequencies are higher (around 2500 MHz), the propagation characteristics are even worse. There is a need therefore for transmission systems that can both satisfy the coverage (propagation) demands,,as well as generate high C/I or SNR levels.
One option is to increase the size of the terminal equipment (TE), or remote, antenna gain. This requires increasing the size. Additionally, it helps to increase the elevation (i.e., vertical height above ground level) of the antenna. The higher you place an antenna, the better the system gain. For a simple planar earth model, the total system path loss (attenuation) is a function of each (transmit and receive) antenna's directive gain (towards one another). However, this path loss is also a function of the height (from ground level) of each antenna. Thus, as you increase the height, from ground, the total system path loss decreases, which is an increase in the overall system link performance, or system gain. The link performance (system) gain increases 6 dB every time you double one of the antenna's height from the ground level. If you double both (i.e., transmitting and receiving) antennas' heights, the total gain (link performnance) goes up by 12 dB (6 dB+6 dB). Therefore, doubling the height from the ground is equivalent to quadrupling the size (area) of the antenna; which produces 4× (or 6 dB) of directive gain.
In conventional analog MMDS systems, this (i. e., increase of SNR or C/I) has been traditionally accomplished by installing a large reflector type antenna (with up to 30 dBi of directional gain) on a rooftop, or a pole. The disadvantages are a complex, difficult, and costly installation; as well as poor aesthetics.
The migration of the MMDS frequency spectrum, from an analog video system, to a wireless data and Internet system, demands a more user friendly (easier) installation method, with much lower cost. The difficulty here is designing a system with sufficient directional gain, as to overcome loss with transmission through walls, as well as being easy to install, and orient; by the consumer, or other persons without specialized skills.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided an easy to install, high gain, omni-directional “indoor” antenna which provides omni-directional coverage. No installation, “pointing” or orientation is required, and the antenna may be installed indoors in a corner of a room.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, four antenna elements are formed as a “book,” that is, two each, back to back; with the pairs oriented at 90° to each other, such that each separate antenna covers a 90° sector, so that the coverage of the antennas when summed creates a full 360° coverage.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an indoor antenna comprises a unitary support structure having a plurality of support surfaces; at least one antenna element mounted to each of the support surfaces; and the support surfaces being
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of transmitting and receiving RF signals comprises coupling a first support member having a first pair of opposed planar support surfaces along a common edge with a second support member having a second pair of opposed planar support surfaces, orienting the first and second support members such that first pair of planar support surfaces are substantially orthogonal to the second pair of planar support surfaces, mounting at least one antenna element to each of a plurality of support surfaces, and arranging the support surfaces in a unitary support structure with the support surfaces oriented to achieve substantially 360° coverage by the antenna elements.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of transmitting and receiving RF signals comprises mounting at least one antenna element to each of a plurality of support surfaces, and arranging the support surfaces on a unitary support structure with the support surfaces and antennas oriented to achieve substantially 360° coverage.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3728733 (1973-04-01), Robinson
patent: 3731315 (1973-05-01), Sheleg
patent: 4032922 (1977-06-01), Provencher
patent: 4124852 (1978-11-01), Steudel
patent: 4189675 (1980-02-01), Reilly et al.
patent: 4246585 (1981-01-01), Mailloux
patent: 4318104 (1982-03-01), Enein
patent: 4338605 (1982-07-01), Mims
patent: 4352202 (1982-09-01), Carney
patent: 4360813 (1982-11-01), Fitzsimmons
patent: 4407001 (1983-09-01), Schmidt
patent: 4446463 (1984-05-01), Irzinski
patent: 4566013 (1986-01-01), Steinberg et al.
patent: 4570165 (1986-02-01), Tsurumaru et al.
patent: 4689631 (1987-08-01), Gans et al.
patent: 4825172 (1989-04-01), Thompson
patent: 4843402 (1989-06-01), Clement
patent: 4849763 (1989-07-01), DuFort
patent: 4879711 (1989-11-01), Rosen
patent: 4890110 (1989-12-01), Kuwahara
patent: 4973971 (1990-11-01), Sinsky et al.
patent: 4994813 (1991-02-01), Shiramatsu et al.
patent: 5019793 (1991-05-01), McNab
patent: 5034752 (1991-07-01), Pourailly et al.
patent: 5086302 (1992-02-01), Miller
patent: 5089823 (1992-02-01), Vasile
patent: 5128687 (1992-07-01), Fay
patent: 5230080 (1993-07-01), Fabre et al.
patent: 5243354 (1993-09-01), Stern et al.
patent: 5248980 (1993-09-01), Raguenet
patent: 5280297 (1994-01-01), Profera, Jr.
patent: 5291211 (1994-03-01), Tropper
patent: 5327150 (1994-07-01), Cherrette
patent: 5351060 (1994-09-01), Bayne
patent: 5379455 (1995-01-01), Koschek
patent: 5463401 (1995-10-01), Iwasaki
patent: 5485170 (1996-01-01), McCarrick
patent: 5486835 (1996-01-01), Hock
patent: 5512906 (1996-04-01), Speciale
patent: 5589843 (1996-12-01), Meredith et al.
patent: 5596329 (1997-01-01), Searle et al.
patent: 5604462 (1997-02-01), Gans et al.
patent: 5619210 (1997-04-01), Dent
patent: 5633647 (1997-05-01), Tines
patent: 5633736 (1997-05-01), Webb et al.
patent: 5644622 (1997-07-01), Russell et al.
patent: 5646631 (1997-07-01), Arntz
patent: 5710804 (1998-01-01), Bhame et al.
patent: 5714957 (1998-02-01), Searle et al.
patent: 5751250 (1998-05-01), Arntz
patent: 5754138 (1998-05-01), Turcotte et al.
patent: 5754139 (1998-05-01), Turcotte et al.
patent: 5758287 (1998-05-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5767807 (1998-06-01), Pritchett
patent: 5770970 (1998-06-01), Ikeda
patent: 5854611 (1998-12-01), Gans et al.
patent: 5856804 (1999-01-01), Turcotte et al.
patent: 5862459 (1999-01-01), Charas
patent: 6043790 (2000-03-01), Derneryd et al.
patent: 6160514 (2000-12-01), Judd
patent: 6198460 (2001-03-01), Brankovic
patent: 6222502 (2001-04-01), Falbo et al.
patent: 6222503 (2001-04-01), Gietema et al.
patent: 0936693 (1998-02-01), None
patent: 2286749 (1996-08-01), None
patent: WO 95/34102 (1995-12-0
Andrew Corporation
Ho Tan
Wood Herron & Evans L.L.P.
LandOfFree
Indoor antenna does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Indoor antenna, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Indoor antenna will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2897986