Surgery – Instruments – Stereotaxic device
Reexamination Certificate
2000-01-07
2004-08-03
Robert, Eduardo C. (Department: 3732)
Surgery
Instruments
Stereotaxic device
Reexamination Certificate
active
06770081
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Advances in minimally invasive surgical technology could dramatically increase the number of surgeries performed in a minimally invasive manner. Minimally invasive medical techniques are aimed at reducing the amount of extraneous tissue that is damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and deleterious side effects. The average length of a hospital stay for a standard surgery may also be shortened significantly using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Thus, an increased adoption of minimally invasive techniques could save millions of hospital days, and millions of dollars annually in hospital residency costs alone. Patient recovery times, patient discomfort, surgical side effects, and time away from work may also be reduced with minimally invasive surgery.
The most common form of minimally invasive surgery may be endoscopy. Probably the most common form of endoscopy is laparoscopy, which is minimally invasive inspection and surgery inside the abdominal cavity. In standard laparoscopic surgery, a patient's abdomen is insufflated with gas, and cannula sleeves are passed through small (approximately ½ inch) incisions to provide entry ports for laparoscopic surgical instruments. The laparoscopic surgical instruments generally include a laparoscope (for viewing the surgical field) and working tools. The working tools are similar to those used in conventional (open) surgery, except that the working end or end effector of each tool is separated from its handle by an extension tube. As used herein, the term “end effector” means the actual working part of the surgical instrument and can include clamps, graspers, scissors, staplers, and needle holders, for example. To perform surgical procedures, the surgeon passes these working tools or instruments through the cannula sleeves to an internal surgical site and manipulates them from outside the abdomen. The surgeon monitors the procedure by means of a monitor that displays an image of the surgical site taken from the laparoscope. Similar endoscopic techniques are employed in, e.g., arthroscopy, retroperitoneoscopy, pelviscopy, nephroscopy, cystoscopy, cisternoscopy, sinoscopy, hysteroscopy, urethroscopy and the like.
There are many disadvantages relating to current minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technology. For example, existing MIS instruments deny the surgeon the flexibility of tool placement found in open surgery. Most current laparoscopic tools have rigid shafts, so that it can be difficult to approach the worksite through the small incision. Additionally, the length and construction of many endoscopic instruments reduces the surgeon's ability to feel forces exerted by tissues and organs on the end effector of the associated tool. The lack of dexterity and sensitivity of endoscopic tools is a major impediment to the expansion of minimally invasive surgery.
Minimally invasive telesurgical robotic systems are being developed to increase a surgeon's dexterity when working within an internal surgical site, as well as to allow a surgeon to operate on a patient from a remote location. In a telesurgery system, the surgeon is often provided with an image of the surgical site at a computer workstation. While viewing a three-dimensional image of the surgical site on a suitable viewer or display, the surgeon performs the surgical procedures on the patient by manipulating master input or control devices of the workstation. The master controls the motion of a servomechanically operated surgical instrument. During the surgical procedure, the telesurgical system can provide mechanical actuation and control of a variety of surgical instruments or tools having end effectors such as, e.g., tissue graspers, needle drivers, or the like, that perform various functions for the surgeon, e.g., holding or driving a needle, grasping a blood vessel, or dissecting tissue, or the like, in response to manipulation of the master control devices.
A typical surgery employs a number of different surgical instruments. When a different tool is desired during the surgical procedure, the surgical instrument is typically withdrawn from the surgical site so that it can be removed from its associated arm and replaced with an instrument bearing the desired end effector. The desired surgical instrument is then inserted into the surgical site.
A surgical instrument may also be withdrawn from a surgical site for reasons other than to replace the end effector. For example, the loading of a clip in a clip applier used in affixing tissue typically occurs outside of the patient's body. Each time a new clip is desired, the clip applier is removed from the surgical site to load the clip and then reintroduced into the patient's body to apply the clip. Tool exchange and instrument loading for a robotic system takes time. Providing additional surgical instruments in the surgical site (and the typically associated need to make additional incisions in the patient's body) may be an undesirable alternative for any number of reasons, e.g., due to space constraints, increase in system complexities, and/or cost.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is generally directed to robotic surgery methods, devices, and systems. The invention overcomes the problems and disadvantages of the prior art by providing surgical clips and/or other in vivo accessories at the surgical site. These in vivo accessories can be manipulated by robotic surgical tools in the site for performing different tasks. The accessories can be held by a dedicated accessory holder or support that is introduced into the surgical site through a separate opening. Alternatively, the accessories can be supported on the body of one of the surgical tools, and can be manipulated using another surgical tool in the surgical site. The surgical tools in the surgical site can use the accessories for performing a wide range of additional tasks without leaving the surgical site. In this way, the need to exchange tools and load instruments outside the surgical site is reduced, thereby minimizing “down time”.
Some “active” accessories need to be actuated to effect a predetermined treatment, such as an aortic punch, clamps, pliers, and the like. For such accessories, the actuation can conveniently be performed by an operator such as an assistant remotely from outside the patient's body while placement of the accessories takes place in the surgical site by manipulating the accessories using robotic surgical tools in the site. A lockdown feature may be incorporated in accessories to lock them in place remotely from outside the surgical site upon actuation. An example involves locking clamp accessories in a closed position for clamping an aorta. After activating the lockdown feature, the assistant is freed to move on to the next task. In addition, the robotic surgical tool used to position the accessory may be removed after activation of the lockdown so that it is available to perform the next task. In this way, the robotic surgical tool inside the surgical site need only be used for a brief period of time to position the accessory and hold it in place until actuation and lockdown is performed remotely from the outside. This approach makes efficient use of the tools inside the surgical site and operator time.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a method of performing minimally invasive robotic surgery in a body cavity of a patient includes introducing at least one surgical accessory and a robotic surgical tool into the cavity. The surgical accessory is coupled with the robotic surgical tool inside the cavity after separately introducing the surgical accessory and the robotic surgical tool into the cavity. The surgical accessory is actuated from outside the cavity of the patient to effect a predetermined treatment. The surgical accessory may be decoupled from the robotic surgical tool inside the cavity.
In some embodiments, the surgical accessory includes a movable member movable in the act
Cooper Thomas G.
Ikeda Michael
Julian Christopher A.
Moll Frederic H.
Ramans Andris D.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Robert Eduardo C.
Townsend and Townsend / and Crew LLP
LandOfFree
In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and In vivo accessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3319045