Communications: electrical – Selective – Interrogation response
Reexamination Certificate
1998-08-07
2001-11-13
Zimmerman, Brian (Department: 2735)
Communications: electrical
Selective
Interrogation response
C340S539230, C340S870020, C340S870030, C455S012100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06317029
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of satellite systems, and in particular to the field of remote sensing of events and parameters via satellite.
2. Description of Related Art
Satellites are often used to sense events that occur at remote locations. Weather satellites use optical and radar devices to sense the presence of clouds, lightning, and other atmospheric phenomena. Reconnaissance satellites use optical, infrared, and other sensing devices to detect occurrences of events on the earth's surface. Scientific satellites use a variety of sensing equipment to detect occurrences of events throughout the universe.
The cost of placing a satellite into orbit and subsequently controlling the satellite significantly increases the relative cost of each sensor in the satellite. Additionally, sensors designed for space must be robust, and require robust ancillary equipment to support their continued operation in a relatively harsh environment. As a result, the cost of placing a sensor in space is significantly higher than the cost of placing a similar sensor on the earth. The additional cost of placing the sensor into orbit, however, allows the sensor to cover a substantially greater area of the earth's surface. It also allows the detection of events in areas that are inaccessible or dangerous for direct placement of the detector.
Satellites can also be used to communicate information from individual sensing devices that are placed at remote locations. For example, weather buoys containing sensing equipment are placed at specific locations across the oceans, and the information from the sensing equipment is communicated via satellites to a centralized weather station. The “FireSat” system of reference [1] discloses the placement of transmitters in a forest. Each transmitter contains a thermocouple and has an associated unique identifier. When a forest fire occurs, the thermocouple turns the transmitter on and the transmitter transmits the unique identifier. A satellite receives the transmission and relays the transmission to a control station that coordinates the firefighting efforts based upon the location of each of the uniquely identified transmitters. These land-based remote sensing systems can be less costly to implement than satellite remote sensing systems, because the satellite need only contain communications equipment, rather than remote sensors designed for each type of phenomena being detected.
The conventional land-based remote sensing system presumes an a priori knowledge of the remotely placed sensors, and/or a unique identification of each sensor. Each uniquely identified thermocouple transmitter in the “FireSat” system, for example, has an associated assigned location, as does each ocean weather buoy. If the thermocouple transmitter in the forest is moved by a creature of the forest, or by a vandal, the transmission of its unique identifier will convey erroneous information, because the control station will direct the firefighting efforts to the original location of the transmitter. The satellite remote sensing system, on the other hand, only requires a knowledge of where the satellite is located and the orientation, or viewing angle, of the sensing device that is detecting the phenomena. The satellite remote sensing system, however, requires a particular sensing device (optical, radar, infrared, etc.) in the satellite for each of the phenomena being detected. To distinguish details of the event or phenomenon being sensed, the resolution of the satellite remote sensing system for each sensing device must also be high, which further adds to the high cost of such a system. The satellite remote sensing system is also subject to premature obsolescence. As time progresses, the infeasibility of replacing or augmenting the equipment on a satellite with newer technologies makes satellite remote sensing systems increasingly less competitive with land based remote sensing systems.
Therefore, a need exists for a remote sensing system that eliminates the need for a satellite that contains a sensing device for each sensed phenomena, and also eliminates the need to place sensing devices at predetermined locations. A need also exists for a remote sensing system that does not require a unique identification of each remote sensor. A further need exists for a high resolution sensing system that does not require high resolution sensing devices.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides for the use of remote sensors that are distributed about the site of the phenomena being sensed, and a satellite system that determines the location of each sensor based upon the receipt of a transmission from the sensor. The remote sensor can be an autonomous transmitter or a transponder that emits a signal in response to the receipt of a triggering signal. The remote sensor may transmit its location explicitly, or its location may be determined by the satellite system based upon the characteristics of the received signals. By providing dynamic location determination means, the remote sensors may be arbitrarily located while assuring the proper association between the sensed event and the location of the sensed event. In a preferred embodiment, the remote sensors are designed to be of minimal complexity and cost, thereby allowing a multitude of sensors to be deployed to effect field measurements of phenomena about the area of interest. In this preferred embodiment, the resolution of the system is determined by the distribution of the low cost sensors, rather than by the resolution of a sensor that is deployed in a satellite.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5376778 (1994-12-01), Kreft
patent: 5758260 (1998-05-01), Wiederman
patent: 5815071 (1998-09-01), Doyle
patent: 6100806 (2000-08-01), Gaukel
patent: 6128469 (2000-10-01), Zenick, Jr. et al.
Space Mission Analysis And Design, Second Edition, Wiley J. Larson and James R. Wertz (editors), Chapter 22, Design of Low-Cost Spacecraft, Rick Fleeter and Richard Warner, AeroAstro, pp. 782-785. Published jointly by Microcosm, Inc. 2601 Airport Drive, Suite 230, Torrance, California 90505 USA and Kluwer Academic Publishers, P.O.Box 17, 3300 AA, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Copyright 1992 W.J.Larson and Microcosm, Inc. ISBN 1-881883-01-9 (pb.) (acid-free paper) ISBN 0-7923-1998-2 (hb.) (acid-free paper).
AeroAstro, LLC
Dalencourt Yves
McDermott, Esq. Robert M.
Zimmerman Brian
LandOfFree
In situ remote sensing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with In situ remote sensing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and In situ remote sensing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2569834