Single-crystal – oriented-crystal – and epitaxy growth processes; – Processes of growth from liquid or supercritical state – Having growth from a solution comprising a solvent which is...
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-08
2004-04-13
Kunemund, Robert (Department: 1765)
Single-crystal, oriented-crystal, and epitaxy growth processes;
Processes of growth from liquid or supercritical state
Having growth from a solution comprising a solvent which is...
C117S069000, C117S200000, C117S206000, C117S900000, C422S245100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06719840
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to devices and methods for performing crystallizations of molecules, and more specifically, to devices and methods for performing crystallizations of molecules in enclosed microvolumes.
2. Description of Related Art
Traditional methods for crystal growth and crystallization are highly labor intensive and require significant quantities of material to evaluate and optimize crystal growth conditions. Examples of these methods include the free interface diffusion method (Salemme, F. R. (1972) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 151:533-539), vapor diffusion in the hanging or sitting drop method (McPherson, A. (1982) Preparation and Analysis of Protein Crystals, John Wiley and Son, New York, pp 82-127), and liquid dialysis (Bailey, K. (1940) Nature 145:934-935).
Presently, the hanging drop method is the most commonly used method for growing macromolecular crystals from solution, especially for protein crystals. Generally, a droplet containing a protein solution is spotted on a cover slip and suspended in a sealed chamber that contains a reservoir with a higher concentration of precipitating agent. Over time, the solution in the droplet equilibrates with the reservoir by diffusing water vapor from the droplet, thereby slowly increasing the concentration of the protein and precipitating agent within the droplet, which in turn results in precipitation or crystallization of the protein.
The process of growing crystals with high diffraction quality is time-consuming and involves trial-and-error experiment on multiple solution variables such as pH, temperature, ionic strength, and specific concentrations of salts, organic additives, and detergents. In addition, the amount of highly purified protein is usually limited, multi-dimensional trials on these solution conditions is unrealistic, labor-intensive and costly.
A few automated crystallization systems have been developed based on the hanging drop methods, for example Cox, M. J. and Weber, P. C. (1987) J. Appl. Cryst. 20:366; and Ward, K. B. et al. (1988) J. Crystal Growth 90:325-339. More recently, systems for crystallizing proteins in submicroliter drop volumes have been described including those described in PCT Publication Nos. WO00/078445 and WO00/060345.
Existing crystallization, such as hanging drop, sitting drop, dialysis and other vapor diffusion methods have the limitation that the material for analysis and the crystallization medium are exposed to the environment for some time. As the volumes of materials decrease, the ratio of surface area to volume ratio varies as the inverse of the radius of the drop. This causes smaller volumes to be more susceptible to evaporation during the initial creation of the correct mixture and during the initial period after the volume has been set up. Typical hanging drop plates can have air volumes of 1.5 milliliters compared to a sample drop size of 3-10 microliters. Moreover, typical methods expose the sample drop to the environment for a duration of seconds to minutes. Small variability in the rate that samples are made can cause significant variations in the production of crystals. Prior methods fail to reduce the problems of convection currents under 1 g such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,646, without the large expenditure of resources or in methods that complicate crystal analysis.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method is provided for determining crystallization conditions for a material, the method comprising: taking a plurality of different crystallization samples in an enclosed microvolume, the plurality of crystallization samples comprising a material to be crystallized and crystallization conditions which vary among the plurality of crystallization samples; allowing crystals of the material to form in plurality of crystallization samples; and identifying which of the plurality of crystallization samples form crystals.
A method is also provided for determining crystallization conditions for a material, the method comprising: taking a plurality of different crystallization samples in a plurality of enclosed microvolumes, each microvolume comprising one or more crystallization samples, the crystallization samples comprising a material to be crystallized and crystallization conditions which vary among the plurality of crystallization samples; allowing crystals of the material to form in plurality of crystallization samples; and identifying which of the plurality of crystallization samples form crystals.
These and other methods, devices, compositions and kits are described herein.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4908112 (1990-03-01), Pace
patent: 5132012 (1992-07-01), Miura et al.
patent: 5180480 (1993-01-01), Manz
patent: 5296114 (1994-03-01), Manz
patent: 5485270 (1996-01-01), Freud et al.
patent: 5833860 (1998-11-01), Kopaciewicz et al.
patent: 6220075 (2001-04-01), Papen et al.
patent: 6267935 (2001-07-01), Hol et al.
patent: 6409832 (2002-06-01), Weigl et al.
patent: 6527432 (2003-03-01), Kellogg et al.
patent: 2002/0029814 (2002-03-01), Unger et al.
patent: 2002/0061687 (2002-05-01), Hansen et al.
patent: 2002/0137218 (2002-09-01), Mian et al.
patent: 2002/0144738 (2002-10-01), Unger et al.
patent: 2002/0145231 (2002-10-01), Quake et al.
patent: 2002/0195046 (2002-12-01), David
patent: 2002/0195048 (2002-12-01), David
patent: 2002/0195050 (2002-12-01), David
patent: 2003/0005877 (2003-01-01), David
patent: WO 93/06479 (1993-01-01), None
Wilson et al., “Control of solvent evaporation in hen egg white lysozyme crystallization”, Journal of Crystal of Growth vol. 116 1992, pp. 414-420.*
Sanjoh et al., “Spatiotemporal protein crystal growth studies using microfluidic silicon devices”, Journal of Crystal Growth vol. 196 (1999) pp. 691-702.
US 2001/0011071 A1, Aug. 2, 2001, Knudsen et al., entitled “Derivatives of GLP-1 Analogs”, 132 pages.
David Nathaniel E.
David Peter R.
Kunemund Robert
Syrrx, Inc.
Weitz David J.
LandOfFree
In situ crystal growth and crystallization does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with In situ crystal growth and crystallization, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and In situ crystal growth and crystallization will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3263742