Implantable or insertable medical device resistant to...

Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C604S265000, C427S002100, C422S028000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06887270

ABSTRACT:
Disclosed are implantable or insertable medical devices that provide resistance to microbial growth on and in the environment of the device and resistance to microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on the device. In particular, the invention discloses implantable or insertable medical devices that comprise at least one biocompatible matrix polymer region, an antimicrobial agent for providing resistance to microbial growth and a microbial adhesion/biofilm synthesis inhibitor for inhibiting the attachment of microbes and the synthesis and accumulation of biofilm on the surface of the medical device. Also disclosed are methods of manufacturing such devices under conditions that substantially prevent preferential partitioning of any of said bioactive agents to a surface of the biocompatible matrix polymer and substantially prevent chemical modification of said bioactive agents.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4036227 (1977-07-01), Zaffaroni et al.
patent: 4054139 (1977-10-01), Crossley
patent: 4240163 (1980-12-01), Galin
patent: 4472327 (1984-09-01), Neefe
patent: 4603152 (1986-07-01), Laurin et al.
patent: 4723950 (1988-02-01), Lee
patent: 4731080 (1988-03-01), Galin
patent: 4853978 (1989-08-01), Stockum
patent: 4902503 (1990-02-01), Umemura et al.
patent: 4923450 (1990-05-01), Maeda et al.
patent: 4933178 (1990-06-01), Capelli
patent: 4946899 (1990-08-01), Kennedy et al.
patent: 4978391 (1990-12-01), Jones
patent: 5080892 (1992-01-01), Yamamori et al.
patent: 5091205 (1992-02-01), Fan
patent: 5091442 (1992-02-01), Milner
patent: 5098379 (1992-03-01), Conway et al.
patent: 5102401 (1992-04-01), Lambert et al.
patent: 5102402 (1992-04-01), Dror et al.
patent: 5130159 (1992-07-01), Shlenker et al.
patent: 5135516 (1992-08-01), Sahatjian et al.
patent: 5137671 (1992-08-01), Conway et al.
patent: 5165952 (1992-11-01), Solomon et al.
patent: 5171318 (1992-12-01), Gibson et al.
patent: 5178870 (1993-01-01), Schaeken et al.
patent: 5217493 (1993-06-01), Raad et al.
patent: 5261896 (1993-11-01), Conway et al.
patent: 5272012 (1993-12-01), Opolski
patent: 5279594 (1994-01-01), Jackson
patent: 5304121 (1994-04-01), Sahatjian
patent: 5328954 (1994-07-01), Sarangapani
patent: 5344411 (1994-09-01), Domb et al.
patent: 5360415 (1994-11-01), Yabushita et al.
patent: 5362754 (1994-11-01), Raad et al.
patent: 5366505 (1994-11-01), Farber
patent: 5370681 (1994-12-01), Herweck et al.
patent: 5389314 (1995-02-01), Wang
patent: 5409012 (1995-04-01), Sahatjian
patent: 5462644 (1995-10-01), Woodson
patent: 5468787 (1995-11-01), Braden et al.
patent: 5512055 (1996-04-01), Domb et al.
patent: 5569463 (1996-10-01), Helmus et al.
patent: 5599298 (1997-02-01), Sahatjian
patent: 5607683 (1997-03-01), Capelli
patent: 5611354 (1997-03-01), Alleyne
patent: 5616119 (1997-04-01), Davis
patent: 5624704 (1997-04-01), Darouiche et al.
patent: 5643207 (1997-07-01), Rise
patent: 5679399 (1997-10-01), Shlenker et al.
patent: 5707366 (1998-01-01), Solomon et al.
patent: 5716406 (1998-02-01), Farber
patent: 5741331 (1998-04-01), Pinchuk
patent: 5772640 (1998-06-01), Modak et al.
patent: 5853745 (1998-12-01), Darouiche
patent: 5902283 (1999-05-01), Darouiche et al.
patent: 6083208 (2000-07-01), Modak et al.
patent: 6106505 (2000-08-01), Modak et al.
patent: 6224579 (2001-05-01), Modak et al.
patent: 6475434 (2002-11-01), Darouiche
patent: 6482830 (2002-11-01), Redkar et al.
patent: 6596401 (2003-07-01), Terry et al.
patent: 20010010016 (2001-07-01), Modak et al.
patent: 3347660 (1985-07-01), None
patent: 0 328 421 (1989-08-01), None
patent: 0 379 271 (1990-07-01), None
patent: 0970711 (2000-01-01), None
patent: WO 9310847 (1993-06-01), None
patent: WO 9714447 (1997-04-01), None
patent: WO 9947595 (1999-09-01), None
patent: WO 0103607 (2001-01-01), None
patent: WO 0121229 (2001-03-01), None
Swartz, R., et al., “Biofilm Formation on Peritoneal Catheters Does Not Require the Presence of Infection,”ASAIO Trans., vol. 37, No. 4, Oct.-Dec. 1991, pp. 626-634.
Richards, G.K., et al., “Comparative Rates of Antibiotic Action AgainstStaphylococcus epidermidisBiofilms,”ASAIO Trans., vol. 37, No. 3, Jul.-Sep. 1991, pp. M160-162.
Stamm, Walter E., “Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Prevention,”American Journal of Medicine, vol. 91, No. 3B, Sep. 1991, pp. 65S-71S.
Golomb, Gershon, et al., “Prevention of Bacterial Colonization on Polyurethane in vitro by Incorporated Antibacterial Agent,”Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 1991, pp. 937-952.
Mulhall, Anne, “Biofilms and Urethral Catheter Infections,”Nursing Standard, vol. 5, No. 18, Jan. 23-29, 1991, pp. 26-28.
Chang, Chung Che, et al., “Effect ofStaphylococcus epidermidison Adherence ofPseudomonas aeruginosaandProteus mirabilisto Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Gentamicin-Containing PMMA,”Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 9, No. 2, Mar. 1991, pp. 284-288.
Liedberg, H., et al., “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Adherence to and Growth on Different Urinary Catheter Coatings,”International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 22, No. 5, 1990, pp. 487-492.
Anwar, Hosmin, et al., “Testing the Susceptibility of Bacteria in Biofilms to Antibacterial Agents,”Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Vo. 34, No. 3, 1990, pp. 2043-2046.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/734,639, filed Dec. 12, 2000, Pinchuk et al.
Dunne, W. Michael Jr., “Effects of Subinhibitory Concentrations of Vancomycin or Cefamandole on Biofilm Production by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci,”Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 34, No. 3, Mar. 1990, pp. 390-393.
Doughterty, Steven H., et al., “Endogenous Factors Contributing to Prosthetic Device Infections,”Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 3, No. 2, Jun. 1989, pp. 199-209.
Speer, Anthony G., et al., “Biliary Stent Blockage with Bacterial Biofilm,”Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 108, No. 4, Apr. 1998, pp. 546-553.
Liedberg, H., et al., “Silver Coating of Urinary Catheters Prevents Adherence and Growth ofPseudomonas Aeruginosa,” Urological Research, vol. 17, No. 6, 1989, pp. 357-358.
Ramsay, J.W.A., et al., “Biofilms, Bacteria, and Bladder Catheters: A Clinical Study,”British Journal of Urology, vol. 64, No. 4, Oct. 1989, pp. 395-398.
Farber, Bruce F., et al., “The Use of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs to Prevent Adherence ofStaphylococcus epidermidisto Medical Polymers,”Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 166, No. 4, Oct., 1992, pp. 861-865.
Farber, Bruce F., et al., “Staphylococcus epidermidisExtracted Slime Inhibits the Antimicrobial Action of Glycpeptide Antibiotics,”Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vo., 161, No. 1, Jan. 1990, pp. 37-40.
Donnenfeld, E.D., et al., “Biofilm and Bacterial Adherence Inhibition with Sodium Salicylate,”Investigative Ophthamology&Visual Science, vol. 35, No. 4, 1994, p. 2164.
Farber, B.F., et al., “Staphylococcus aureusExtracted Polysaccharide Interferes with the Antimicrobial Action of Glycopeptide Antibiotics,”Clinical Research, vol. 38, No. 2, 1990, p. 428A.
Farber, B.F., et al., “ExtractedS. epidermidisSlime Interferes with the Antimicrobial Action of Glycopeptide Antibiotics,”Clinical Research, vol. 37, No. 2, 1990, p. 428A.
Farber, B.F., et al., “Unique Properties ofS. epidermidisExtractable Polysaccharide Slime (SEEP),”Clinical Research, vol. 36, No. 3, 1988, p. 455A.
Teichberg, Saul, et al., “Salicylic Acid Decreases Extracellular Biofilm Production byStaphylococcus epidermidis: Electron Microscope Analysis,”Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 167, No. 6, 1993, pp. 1501-1503.
Farber, Bruce F., et al., “A Novel Antibiofilm Technology for Contact Lens Solutions,”Ophtalmology, vol. 102, No. 5, May 1995, pp. 831-836.
Roberts, E. L., et al., “The Role of Sodiuym Salicylate in the Prevention of the Adherence of Acanthamoeba Castellanii to Unworn Contact Lenses,”Investigative

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Implantable or insertable medical device resistant to... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Implantable or insertable medical device resistant to..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Implantable or insertable medical device resistant to... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3400872

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.