Prosthesis (i.e. – artificial body members) – parts thereof – or ai – Implantable prosthesis – Bone
Reexamination Certificate
2001-05-30
2003-10-21
Willse, David H. (Department: 3738)
Prosthesis (i.e., artificial body members), parts thereof, or ai
Implantable prosthesis
Bone
Reexamination Certificate
active
06635086
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention generally relates to prostheses for the spine and more specifically to an implant to separate adjacent cervical vertebrae.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The spine is the central support column for the human body. The cervical region of the spine is located in the area of the neck and is comprised of cervical vertebrae separated by disks. A diseased spine suffers from deterioration of a vertebra, disk or both. Disks and vertebrae may also be damaged by physical causes as well. Surgical repair consists of fusing adjacent vertebrae together by means of a bone graft. It is necessary to keep the adjacent vertebrae spaced at a certain distance at the time the bone graft is growing and fusing the adjacent vertebrae together. Traditionally, this has been done mechanically. Typically, the systems are comprised of plates and screws or rods and screws.
Intervertebral implants may be used to replace or augment the method of grafting. A problem with grafting is that grafts are not always successful. Resorption of the graft results in a collapse of the area between the vertebrae. A permanent support structure such as an implant will not allow collapse. A problem with prior art intervertebral implants is that most are designed for use in the lumber section of the spine and thus have contoured surfaces which match the contour of the lumbar vertebrae. The cervical vertebrae have contours different from those of the lumbar vertebrae.
Another problem with prior art implants currently being used in the cervical section of the spine is that some implants which are formed as cages do not have superior strength characteristics. An implant which is simple to manufacture and has superior strength is desired.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention overcomes disadvantages in the prior art by providing an improved cervical implant for holding spinal vertebrae apart. The implant is stirrup shaped and includes a ring portion having two legs and an interconnecting section. The legs of the ring portion are connected to a truncation which has a thickness which exceeds the thickness of the ring portion. The legs of the ring portion also includes upper and lower surfaces provided with barbed saw teeth, each tooth defined by a proximal face having a rearward tapered angle and a substantially vertical distal face and a rounded valley between each pair of adjacent teeth.
The invention, in the aspects described above, provides the advantage of a physical support device which prevents the collapse of adjacent vertebrae in the event a bone graft is unsuccessful. This device is easy to insert and has superior strength. These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will be fully described by the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3298372 (1967-01-01), Feinberg
patent: 3905047 (1975-09-01), Long
patent: 3916907 (1975-11-01), Peterson
patent: 4289123 (1981-09-01), Dunn
patent: 4349921 (1982-09-01), Kuntz
patent: 4401112 (1983-08-01), Rezaian
patent: RE31628 (1984-07-01), Allgower et al.
patent: 4484570 (1984-11-01), Sutter et al.
patent: 4493317 (1985-01-01), Klaue
patent: 4611581 (1986-09-01), Steffee
patent: 4636217 (1987-01-01), Ogilvie et al.
patent: 4653481 (1987-03-01), Howland et al.
patent: 4655199 (1987-04-01), Steffee
patent: 4696290 (1987-09-01), Steffee
patent: 4714469 (1987-12-01), Kenna
patent: 4772287 (1988-09-01), Ray et al.
patent: 4790297 (1988-12-01), Luque
patent: 4820305 (1989-04-01), Harms et al.
patent: 4834757 (1989-05-01), Brantigan
patent: 4854311 (1989-08-01), Steffee
patent: 4878915 (1989-11-01), Brantigan
patent: 4898161 (1990-02-01), Grundei
patent: 4913134 (1990-04-01), Luque
patent: 4936848 (1990-06-01), Bagby
patent: 4961740 (1990-10-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5015247 (1991-05-01), Michelson
patent: 5015255 (1991-05-01), Kuslich
patent: 5026373 (1991-06-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5055104 (1991-10-01), Ray
patent: 5059193 (1991-10-01), Kuslich
patent: 5147361 (1992-09-01), Ojima et al.
patent: 5147402 (1992-09-01), Bohler et al.
patent: 5192327 (1993-03-01), Brantigan
patent: 5306307 (1994-04-01), Senter et al.
patent: 5334194 (1994-08-01), Mikhail
patent: 5364399 (1994-11-01), Lowery et al.
patent: 5380324 (1995-01-01), Müller et al.
patent: 5423817 (1995-06-01), Lin
patent: 5425772 (1995-06-01), Brantigan
patent: 5489307 (1996-02-01), Kuslich et al.
patent: 5489308 (1996-02-01), Kuslich et al.
patent: 5505732 (1996-04-01), Michelson
patent: 5514180 (1996-05-01), Heggeness et al.
patent: 5562662 (1996-10-01), Brumfield et al.
patent: 5607424 (1997-03-01), Tropiano
patent: 5609635 (1997-03-01), Michelson
patent: 5630816 (1997-05-01), Kambin
patent: 5653761 (1997-08-01), Pisharodi
patent: 5653762 (1997-08-01), Pisharodi
patent: 5658336 (1997-08-01), Pisharodi
patent: 5665122 (1997-09-01), Kambin
patent: 5676666 (1997-10-01), Oxland et al.
patent: 5683391 (1997-11-01), Boyd
patent: 5693100 (1997-12-01), Pisharodi
patent: 5709683 (1998-01-01), Bagby
patent: 5713900 (1998-02-01), Benzel et al.
patent: 5716355 (1998-02-01), Jackson et al.
patent: 5720748 (1998-02-01), Kuslich et al.
patent: 5766252 (1998-06-01), Henry et al.
patent: 5776199 (1998-07-01), Michelson
patent: 5785710 (1998-07-01), Michelson
patent: 5797917 (1998-08-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 5803904 (1998-09-01), Mehdizadeh
patent: 5860977 (1999-01-01), Zucherman et al.
patent: 5865845 (1999-02-01), Thalgott
patent: 5865847 (1999-02-01), Kohrs et al.
patent: 5888227 (1999-03-01), Cottle
patent: 5904683 (1999-05-01), Pohndorf et al.
patent: 5916267 (1999-06-01), Tienboon
patent: 6143033 (2000-11-01), Paul et al.
patent: 6206923 (2001-03-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 6231610 (2001-05-01), Geisler
patent: 6241771 (2001-06-01), Gresser et al.
patent: 6245108 (2001-06-01), Biscup
patent: 6258125 (2001-07-01), Paul et al.
patent: 6371988 (2002-04-01), Pafford et al.
patent: 6432140 (2002-08-01), Lin
patent: WO 01/28463 (2001-04-01), None
patent: WO 02/13731 (2002-02-01), None
Depraetere et al., Interbody Cages in PLIF Surgery, A Multicentric Report.
Brantigan, I/F Cage for PLIF, Acromed.
BAK?Proximity Posterior Interbody Fusion System, Spinetech.
Ray et al., A Prosterior Lmumbar Nucleus “Artificial Disc,” Stryker Implants.
A Cellular Structural Biomaterial, Hedrocel.
Blacksheep Technologies Incorporated
Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP
Jackson Suzette J.
LandOfFree
Implant for placement between cervical vertebrae does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Implant for placement between cervical vertebrae, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Implant for placement between cervical vertebrae will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3113197