Image rejection downconverter for a translation loop modulator

Pulse or digital communications – Transmitters – Angle modulation

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C375S295000, C455S553100

Reexamination Certificate

active

06560297

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of transmitters for radio frequency communication systems, and particularly relates to transmitters including constant envelope modulation systems.
As wireless communication systems have become increasingly popular, a demand has developed for less expensive yet spectrally clean radio frequency (RF) transmitters having constant envelope modulation systems. High quality RF transmitters typically include relatively expensive components. For example, certain bandpass filters, such as surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters provide excellent performance yet are relatively expensive. Many applications further require transmitters that exhibit low power consumption. It is also desirable that transmitters be suitable for use with any of a plurality of standards for modulation, e.g., global system for mobile communication (GSM) or digital cellular system (DCS).
Constant envelope modulation systems including translation loop modulators are known to provide circuits having relatively less expensive filtering requirements. Translation loop modulators generally include a feedback loop in communication with the output oscillator that is coupled to a transmission antenna. The feedback loop permits the circuit itself to provide bandpass filtering since the output signal may be locked to a given center frequency.
A conventional translation loop modulation system is shown in FIG.
1
. The system
10
includes quadrature modulation circuitry
12
, phase comparitor circuitry
14
, a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO)
16
coupled to an output antenna (not shown) a feedback coupler
17
, and a feedback path
18
. Input signals representative of the information to be modulated and transmitted may be applied to the I and Q channels of the quadrature modulator. The input signals may be modulated to adjust the phase or angle of a reference signal. This phase information is converted to a voltage signal by the phase comparitor circuitry
14
, and the voltage signal is then converted to a frequency signal by the VCO
16
. The feedback path
18
provides a phase locked loop to lock the VCO
16
to a given center frequency.
It is conventionally known that transmitter circuits should be designed to reduce the possibility of spurious signals (e.g., harmonics as well as foreign signals) being introduced into the system. In certain situations, the origin of some spurious signals may be extremely difficult to discern, particularly if they appear only sporatically, and may be nearly impossible to simulate. To address this problem, it is conventionally believed that transmitter circuits of the type shown in
FIG. 1
should be designed to be flexible so that they may be adjusted to remove any noise.
For example, in certain situations, a circuit may be most easily corrected by adjusting either the voltage controlled oscillator
20
in the phase comparitor circuitry, or the voltage controlled oscillator
22
in the feedback path. Employing two separate oscillators facilitates adjustment for reducing noise since either may be adjusted independent of the other. Moreover, the frequencies may be chosen so as to not be harmonically related, which minimizes the chance of harmonic spurious signals being produced by the oscillators.
Unfortunately, however, some oscillators are rather expensive. For example, certain oscillator circuits that are formed of synthesizers produce very stable output signals, but are relatively expensive. It is also desirable that the use of relatively expensive filters be avoided.
There is a need, therefore, for inexpensive yet efficient constant envelope modulation systems for use with dual mode transmitters. There is further a need for a translation loop modulator that is spectrally efficient yet economical to produce.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a rejection converter for use in a transmitter, such as a translation loop modulator, for operating in at least either of a first mode for transmitting signals within a fast frequency range, and a second mode for transmitting signals within a second frequency range. The converter includes an input unit for receiving an input signal in at least either of the first or second frequency ranges. The converter also includes a rejection unit for rejecting at least one spurious harmonic signal associated with the first frequency range that falls within the second frequency range. The converter permits signals in the second frequency range to be passed when the output signal is within the second frequency range.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5410743 (1995-04-01), Seely et al.
patent: 5815804 (1998-09-01), Newell et al.
patent: 5896562 (1999-04-01), Heinonen
patent: 6014551 (2000-01-01), Pesola et al.
patent: 6043721 (2000-03-01), Nagode et al.
patent: 6208875 (2001-03-01), Damgaard et al.
patent: 197 43 207 C 1 (1997-09-01), None
patent: 0 739 090 (1996-10-01), None
patent: 0 917 297 (1999-05-01), None
patent: 2 296 613 (1994-12-01), None

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Image rejection downconverter for a translation loop modulator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Image rejection downconverter for a translation loop modulator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Image rejection downconverter for a translation loop modulator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3057339

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.