Identification of sample component using a mass sensor system

Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Chemical analysis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C073S023200

Reexamination Certificate

active

06289287

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to sample analysis systems and, more particularly, to a system for analyzing a plurality of complex samples to classify those complex samples and to determine the identity of an unknown sample component in one of such complex samples.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Data representative of a plurality of complex samples is generated by modern instruments for use in a wide variety of quantitative and qualitative data analyses. Often, at least two goals can be identified for such data analysis: (1) comparing one or more samples to a standard having a known, or approved, composition so as to classify each sample; and with regard to a sample that has been classified, (2) providing an accurate identification of the component(s) in a sample that caused such sample to be classified as a differentiated, or anomalous complex sample.
To accomplish these goals, modem pattern recognition techniques are sometimes used to interpret the data. The purpose of such pattern recognition is usually to aid in classification of the sample (e.g., Is the sample of acceptable quality? Is the sample consistent with a previous run?) The advent of pattern recognition software has simplified methods development and automated the routine use of robust pattern matching in chromatography and similar analytical methods.
The field of study which encompasses this type of pattern recognition technology is called chemometrics. For example, a mass spectrogram or a chromatogram can be thought of as a data matrix representative of a “chemical fingerprint” wherein a pattern can emerge from the relative intensities of the sequence of peaks in the data matrix. Chromatographic fingerprinting, whether interpreted by human intervention or automated pattern recognition in software, has been used to infer a property of interest (typically adherence to a performance standard); or to classify the sample into one of several categories (good versus bad, Type A versus Type B, etc.).
Some examples of the use of chemometrics to problems in chromatographic pattern recognition, with applications drawn from different industries are as follows: In the food and beverage industry, sensory evaluation is sometimes coupled with instrumented analysis to classify samples according to geographical/varietal origin, for competitor evaluation, for determining a change in process or raw material or similar constituents, and in general for quality control and classification. In the medical and clinical industries, improved data analysis is required for identification of microbial species by evaluation of cell wall material, cancer profiling and classification, and for predicting disease states. For example, a prime concern of clinical diagnosis is to classify disorders rapidly and accurately and techniques have been applied to chromatographic data to develop models allowing clinicians to distinguish among disease states based on the patterns in body fluids or cellular material. In the field of environmental monitoring, improved data systems are now required for the evaluation of trace organics and pollutants, for performing pollution monitoring where multiple sources are present; and for effective extraction of information from large environmental databases.
Furthermore, instrumentation for carrying out gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric analyses are well known in the art for identifying one or more specific chemical components of a sample mixture. For example, chromatography is a method of analyzing a sample comprised of several components to qualitatively determine the identity of the sample components as well as quantitatively determine the concentration of the components.
Some of the above-described approaches have been successful in achieving an accurate comparison of a plurality of samples to a standard having a known, or approved, composition so as to classify each sample; others of the above-described approaches have been successful in identifying a specific chemical component of a sample mixture. However, none of the above-described approaches have been completely successful achieving both of the above-described data analysis goals in the one integrated methodology, namely, the integration of: a comparison of a plurality of samples to a standard having a known, or approved composition so as to classify each sample; and providing an accurate identification of the component(s) present in a classified sample that caused the sample to be classified as anomalous.
Accordingly, there is a need for an integrated method for achieving not only classification of a plurality of complex samples, but also for providing an accurate identification of the component(s) present in a sample that caused that sample to be classified as anomalous.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a method may be carried out for classifying a complex sample and for identification of an anomalous sample component in a complex sample, wherein the complex sample is provided in a group of complex samples. The method includes the steps of: providing the group of complex samples to a sampler; sampling a quantity of each of the complex samples so as to provide a respective quantity of vapor phase molecules of the respective complex sample to a mass sensor; deriving a mass spectrum representative of the masses in each of the complex samples analyzed by the mass sensor, so as to generate a plurality of mass spectra; providing the mass spectra to a computer in a data matrix; performing an exploratory data analysis of the data matrix using at least one set of principal components; performing a classification method analysis using a soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) technique, wherein the masses exhibiting a high discriminating power are selected; performing, with use of each of the selected masses that exhibit a high discrimination power, a mass correlation analysis with respect to each selected mass so as to determine a set of at least three correlated masses; comparing each of the three correlated masses to mass spectra in a mass spectra library so as to identify at least one candidate mass spectrum that is associated with the correlated masses and which is potentially indicative of a respective differentiating sample component; reviewing the candidate mass spectrum to select the differentiating sample component that is associated with the correlated masses; and identifying the selected differentiating sample component.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4008388 (1977-02-01), McLafferty et al.
patent: 4075475 (1978-02-01), Risby et al.
patent: 4084090 (1978-04-01), Boettger et al.
patent: 4314156 (1982-02-01), Kuppermann et al.
patent: 4573354 (1986-03-01), Voorhees et al.
patent: 5218529 (1993-06-01), Meyer et al.
patent: 5243282 (1993-09-01), Miller, III et al.
patent: 5412207 (1995-05-01), Micco et al.
patent: 5545895 (1996-08-01), Wright et al.
patent: 5710713 (1998-01-01), Wright et al.
patent: 5744702 (1998-04-01), Roussis et al.
patent: 5970804 (1999-10-01), Robbat, Jr.
patent: 6107627 (2000-08-01), Nakagawa et al.
patent: WO 96/42058 (1996-12-01), None
patent: WO 98/09148 (1998-03-01), None
Pirouette Manual, “Multivariate Data Analysis for Windows 95/98 and NT” Version 2.5. Copyright 1985-1998 by Infometrix, Inc., pp..i—18-30.
Application Note: Wolf Muenchmeyer, Andreas Walte, “Fast Analysis of Complex Mixtures with Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometry and Neural Networks,” WMA Airsense Analysentechnik GmbH.
B. Dittmann, S. Nitz and G. Horner:“A new chemical sensor on a mass spectrometric basis,” Advances in Food Sciences (Adv. FoodSci. (CMTL)) vol. 20, No. 3/4, pp. 69-121, May 1998.
C. Kai Meng, Philip L. Wylie, and Cynthia Cai, “Classifying Citrus Products With A Chemical Sensor,” Chemical Sensor Technology, Food Testing & Analysis, Oct.-Nov. 1998, pp. 17-18.
“Fast Answers, Without a Doubt” Copyright 1998 by Hewlett-Packard Company, Publication No. (23) 5966-4190E.
“The HP 4440 Primer” Copyright Hewlett-Packard Company 1998, Part No. G2702-90100.
H. Troy Nagle, Susan S. Schiffman, Ri

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Identification of sample component using a mass sensor system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Identification of sample component using a mass sensor system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Identification of sample component using a mass sensor system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2435887

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.