Identical-by-descent fragment enrichment

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C435S091100, C435S091200, C536S025300

Reexamination Certificate

active

06524794

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
As understanding of the role of genetic alterations in the basis of disease has increased, methods have been developed to facilitate identification of disease-causing mutations. Recently, a method of genomic mismatch scanning (GMS) has been used to identif regions of DNA that are “identical by descent” (“IBD”) in individuals who are distantly related, that is, regions of DNA that are inherited from a common ancestor (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,376,526 to Brown et al; Nelson, S. F.,
Electrophoresis
16:279-285 (1995); Cheung, V. G. et al.,
Nature Genetics
18:225-230 (1998); and Cheung, V. G. and Nelson, S. F.,
Genomics
47:1-6 (1998)). DNA that is IBD between individuals who are distantly related, and who are affected by a disease, may contain a genetic mutation within a shared BD region that contributes to or causes the disease (see, e.g., Mirzayans, F. et al.,
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
61:111-119 (1997)). GMS methods employ a series of steps, including use of a panel of methyl-directed mismatch repair enzymes (mutH, mutL and mutS from
Escherichia coli
), and binding of mismatched fragments to benzoylated, naphthylated DEAE cellulose (BNDC). Difficulties associated with GMS methods include optimization of the mutHLS enzymes, unreliability of BNDC binding, and high background interference (see Kruglyak, L. and McAllister, L.,
Nature Genetics
18:200-202 (1998)). Easier and more accurate methods of identifying IBD regions of DNA would enhance the ability to identify mutations associated with disease.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is drawn to methods of identifying DNA fragments containing DNA that are identical by descent for two individuals. In the methods, a sample of genomic DNA is obtained from each of the two individuals. The samples are initially digested with a restriction endonuclease, such as PstI; one of the samples is then methylated, while the other is preserved as a non-methylated sample. The digested, methylated and non-methylated samples are then mixed and incubated under conditions which allow denaturation of the DNA (e.g., heating of the mixture). The denatured mixture is then allow to re-anneal, preferably in the presence of a phenol based emulsion (e.g., formamide phenol emulsion reassociation technique), forming a mixture containing homohybrid DNA fragments (both methylated homohybrids and non-methylated hybrids), and heterohybrid DNA fragments (“hemi-methylated”). The re-annealed sample is then contacted with restriction endonucleases which digest the homohybrid DNA fragments (e.g., DpnI, which digests methylated, double-stranded DNA, and MboI, which digests unmethylated, double-stranded DNA). The sample is then contacted with an endonuclease(s) which cleaves both strands of a mismatch-containing heterohybrid DNA fragment (e.g., T7 endonuclease I, which yields 5′ overhangs which are exonuclease III sensitive, and can thus be digested by ExoIII). As a result of this process, the sample mixture contains and is enriched in perfectly-matched heterohybrid DNA fragments which comprise DNA fragments that are identical by descent for the two individuals. If desired, the mixture can be further processed by contact with an exonuclease which digests small fragments generated by the endonuclease(s) which cleaves both strands of a mismatch-containing heterohybrid DNA fragment. As the fragments may contain many repetitive sequences, the mixture can be incubated with repeat-rich DNA (e.g., COT-1) to hybridize and remove the repetitive sequences. In addition, the perfectly-matched heterohybrid DNA fragments can be ligated to nucleic acid adaptors and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or long-range polymerase chain reaction (LR-PCR). To reduce background interference further, the process described above can be repeated, one or more times, using perfectly-matched heterohybrid DNA fragments as a first sample of genomic DNA, and a sample of genomic DNA from a third (or fourth, etc.,) individual as a second sample of genomic DNA. The methods of the invention provide a simple and efficient means of identifying regions of genomic DNA that are identical by descent, utilizing enzymes which significantly eliminate background interference without requiring extensive optimization of conditions.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5132207 (1992-07-01), Kohne et al.
patent: 5376526 (1994-12-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5571676 (1996-11-01), Shuber
patent: 5679522 (1997-10-01), Modrich et al.
patent: 5698400 (1997-12-01), Cotton et al.
patent: 5702894 (1997-12-01), Modrich et al.
patent: 5721098 (1998-02-01), Pinkel et al.
patent: 5824471 (1998-10-01), Mashal et al.
patent: 5851770 (1998-12-01), Babon et al.
patent: 5858754 (1999-01-01), Modrich et al.
patent: 5876929 (1999-03-01), Wigler et al.
patent: 5876941 (1999-03-01), Landegren et al.
patent: 5958692 (1999-09-01), Cotton et al.
patent: 6027898 (2000-02-01), Gjerde et al.
patent: WO 93/18186 (1993-09-01), None
patent: WO 95/12688 (1995-05-01), None
patent: WO 96/35809 (1996-11-01), None
patent: WO 96/41002 (1996-12-01), None
patent: WO 99/35486 (1999-07-01), None
patent: WO 99/35602 (1999-07-01), None
patent: WO 00/46402 (2000-08-01), None
Straus et al. PNAS USA. 1990. vol. 87 p. 1889-1893.*
Dean, M., “Resolving DNA mutations”,Nature Genetics, 9:103-104 (1995).
Marshal, R.D., et al., “Detection of mutations by cleavage of DNA heteroduplexes with bacteriophage resolvases”,Nature Genetics, 9:177-183 (1995).
Mashal, R.D., et al., “Enzyme Mismatch Cleavage—Bacteriophage Resolvases”,Laboratory Methods for the Detection of Mutations and Polymorphisms IN, pp. 217-223 (1997).
Chung I, et al., “The use of cloned repetitive sequences as hybridization competitors to detect single copy sequences”,Genetic Analysis:Biomelecular Engineering, 14(1) :13-15 (1997).
Asgeirsson, B., et al., “Hereditary Cystatin C Amyloid Angiopathy: Monitoring the Presence of the Leu-68→ Gln Cystatin C Variant in Cerebrospinal Fluids and Monocyte Cultures by MS,”Biochem. J., 329 (3) :497-503 (1998).
Cheung, V.G. and Nelson, S.F., “Genomic Mismatch Scanning Identifies Human Genomic DNA Shared Identical by Descent,”Genomics, 47:1-6 (1998).
Cheung, V.G., et al., “Linkage-disequilibrium Mapping Without Genotyping,”Nature Genetics, 18:225-230 (1998).
Jonsdottir, S. and Palsdottir, A., “Molecular Diagnosis of Hereditary Cystatin C Amyloid Angiopathy,”Biochem. Medicine and Metabolic Biol., 49:117-123 (1993).
Kruglyak, L. and McAllister, L., “Who Needs Genetic Markers?,”Nature Genetics, 18:200-202 (1998).
Levy, E., et al., “Stroke in Icelandic Patients with Hereditary Amyloid Angiopathy is Related to a Mutation in the Cystatin C Gene in Inhibitor of Cysteine Proteases,”J. Exp. Med., 169:1771-1778 (1989).
McAllister, L., et al., “Enrichment for Loci Identical-by-Descent between Pairs of Mouse or Human Genomes by Genomic Mismatch Scanning,”Genomics, 47:7-11 (1998).
Mirzayans, F., et al., “Identification of the Human Chromosomal Region Containing the Iridogoniodysgenesis Anomaly Locus by Genomic-Mismatch Scanning,”Am. J. Hum. Genet., 61:111-119 (1997).
Nelson, S.F., “Genomic Mismatch Scanning: Current Progress and Potential Applications,”Electrophoresis, 16:279-285 (1995).
Wei, L., et al., “Instability of the Amyloidogenic Cystatin C Variant of Hereditary Cerebral Hemorrhage with Amyloidosis, Icelandic Type,”J. Bio. Chem., 273(19):11806-11814 (1998).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Identical-by-descent fragment enrichment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Identical-by-descent fragment enrichment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Identical-by-descent fragment enrichment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3122518

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.