Hyperthermia and immunotherapy for leukemias lymphomas, and...

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Antigen – epitope – or other immunospecific immunoeffector – Virus or component thereof

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S278100, C424S218100, C424S093600

Reexamination Certificate

active

06524587

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to hyperthermia and immunotherapy for treatment of cancer.
BACKGROUND
2. Description of Prior Art
The earliest references to treating cancer with hyperthermia can be found in Egyptian papyrus scrolls dated back to 3000 BC describing a breast cancer patient treated with immersion in hot water. Total body hyperthermia in the form of hyperpyrexia (fever) has produced dramatic tumor regressions and even cures following infection with pyrogenic bacteria. In the late 19
th
and early 20
th
centuries Dr. William Coley reviewed cases of spontaneous tumor regression and discovered that a common factor was a prolonged fever in excess of 39.5 degrees C. or 103.5 degrees F.
Dr. Coley tried to duplicate the fevers with
Streptococcus pyogenes
bacterial lysates, which contained the pyrogenic material lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Coley treated a wide variety of carcinomas and sarcomas with his Mixed Bacterial Toxins (MBT), achieving 5-year survival rates of 60% in inoperable malignant melanoma cases. These rates are considerably higher than those obtained using surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy programs. Problems developed when patients began producing large quantities of neutralizing antibody which required larger amounts of MBT. In addition, Coley had difficulty standardizing the pyrogenicity of the toxins. Coley remained convinced that a key portion of his treatment's success was based due to the enhanced immune response to the toxins, which somehow was cross-reactive against the tumors. Current knowledge of immunology confirms Coley's hypothesis, but it is now clear that antiviral immunity is much more closely related to antitumor immunity than the antibacterial response mechanisms.
This is due to the fact that bacterial infections primarily stimulate the humoral or antibody+complement arm of the immune system. For extracellular parasites such as bacteria and protozoa, this provides an efficient means of elimination within the bloodstream. Viruses, however, are intracellular parasites, and virus-infected host cells express viral antigens on their cell surface in conjunction with normal cell proteins. Hence, Killer Lymphocytes, with ability to recognize and kill virus-infected cells, are needed to eradicate the virus. Because cancerous cells also express “self” or normal host antigens on the cell surface along with “altered-self” or mutated tumor antigens, the same effector cells are needed. Natural Killer (NK), Lymphokine-Activated Killer (LAK), and antigen-specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes, have the primary responsibility of antitumor and antiviral surveillance and elimination. To date, there is no reference in the Scientific Literature to using a pyrogenic virus to induce whole-body hyperthermia.
Other techniques of inducing hyperthermia have been tried: immersion in hot liquids, limb perfusion, and even microwave radiation. The main disadvantage to these methods is that most cancers are deep within the tissue layers, and heating from the outside cannot generate a sufficient temperature to kill the tumor cells. Another problem with these prior-art approaches is that in metastasized cancer, tumor cells are spread throughout the body, and a treatment designed to be curative must heat the entire body as well. A whole-body pyremia approach utilizing a safe but pyrogenic virus solves these two difficulties.
Numerous versions of immunotherapy have been tried in cancer treatment, both specific and non-specific in nature. The primary non-specific immune modulator in cancer therapy has been Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, or BCG. BCG produces a Delayed-Type-Hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction which activates local macrophages to become tumorcidal in some cases. However, it is a poor pyrogenic agent, so hyperthermic benefits are not realized. Also, as detailed previously, it stimulates primarily the humoral arm of the immune system, so interferon production and NK activation are generally low.
Exogenous interferon therapies have been attempted, but suffer from purification and toxicity problems. Researchers have been able to achieve alpha-interferon levels 10 times higher than normal, but the response is hampered by Serum Blocking Factors (SBF) that neutralize the foreign interferon before it can induce a strong cellular response. Immunologists are in general agreement that therapies which stimulate endogenous interferon production are preferable to those which rely on injection of recombinant interferons and interleukins. The described immunotherapy stimulates endogenous interferon A levels approximately 260 times normal levels.
Numerous approaches to cancer vaccines have been attempted, with both sub-unit peptide and whole cell irradiated preparations generating a measurable response. In the case of malignant melanoma, polypeptide vaccines containing a common melanoma antigen: gp100, MART-1/Melan-A, and TRP-1, (Tyrosinase-Related Protein), have been clinically tested. The major drawback to these approaches is that being polypeptides, they can tolerize rather than induce a Killer Cell response. In addition, not all melanoma cells express these antigens in vivo to label them for identification and lysis by effector cells.
Another antigen-specific approach is to use whole cancer cells that have been killed in a manner (usually irradiation) that leaves their antigenic structure intact. These cells are then injected back into the body to induce an immune response. The problem with this approach is that the tumor burden must be reduced by physical means before the specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes are induced. The three major anticancer therapies: surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy reduce tumor burden but simultaneously devastate the immune system. The described therapy is designed to overcome these barriers.
Objects and Advantages
Accordingly, besides the objects and advantages of a whole-body, hyperthermic therapy based on pyrexia in response to a viral agent, several objects and advantages of the present invention are:
(a) to provide a means of reducing the tumor burden through a physical means (fever) in excess of 103.5 degrees F. which does not impair immune function.
(b) to induce billions of Natural Killer Lymphocytes to become Lymphokine-Activated Killers (LAK) cells capable of nonspecific tumorcidal activity.
(c) to induce a clone of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL) capable of recognizing and destroying tumor cells bearing specific tumor antigens for the life of the patient.
(d) to accomplish the preceding activities without risk of serious harm to the patient.
Other objectives and advantages will become evident from the following detailed description of the invention and its operation.


REFERENCES:
patent: 6048686 (2000-04-01), Lyday
Sinkovics and Horvath, “New Developments in the Virus Therapy of Cancer: A Historical Review”, Intervirology, 1993, vol. 36, pp. 193-214.*
Islas-Rodriguez et al, “Efecto de la infeccion in vitro del virus del dengue (DEN-2) sobre algunas funciones de la respuesta immune celilar del raton”, Archivos de Investigacion Medica (abstract), vol. 21, No.2, pp.87-93, 1990.*
Mettler et al, “Virus Inoculation in Mice Bearing Ehrlich Ascitic Tumors: Antigen Prouction and Tumor Regression”, Infection and Immunity, vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 23-27, 1982.*
Angsubhakorn et al, “Neurovirulence detection of dengue virus using rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys”, Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 13-24, 1987.*
Eckels et al, “Isolation of a Temperature-Sensitive Dengue-2 Virus Under Conditions Suitable for Vaccine Development”, Infection and Immunity, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 1221-1227, 1976.*
Gabrilovitch et al, “Dendritic Cells in Antitumor Immune Responses”, Cellular Immunology, vol. 170, No. 1, pp. 111-119, Jun. 1996.*
Mizoguchi et al, “Alterations in signal-transduction molecules in T-lymphocytes from tumor-bearing mice”, Science, vol. 258, pp. 1795-1798, Dec. 1992.*
Kuss et al, “Clinical significance of decreased zeta chain expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes . . . ”, Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 5, pp.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Hyperthermia and immunotherapy for leukemias lymphomas, and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Hyperthermia and immunotherapy for leukemias lymphomas, and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hyperthermia and immunotherapy for leukemias lymphomas, and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3127502

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.