Chemistry: fischer-tropsch processes; or purification or recover – Liquid phase fischer-tropsch reaction
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-20
2003-03-11
Parsa, Jafar F (Department: 1621)
Chemistry: fischer-tropsch processes; or purification or recover
Liquid phase fischer-tropsch reaction
C518S702000, C208S093000, C208S133000, C208S209000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06531515
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to improved hydrocarbon recovery from a Fischer-Tropsch process.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Several natural gas vehicles (NGVs) have been developed in response to recent laws such as the Clean Air Act (1990) and the Energy Policy Act (1992). Because natural gas tends to burn cleanly, NGVs are a potential alternative to gasoline-powered vehicles.
There are several commercially available natural gas-based fuel formulations. The main formulations are: compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). In CNG technology, the gaseous (natural gas) fuel is stored at very high pressures of about 20684 kPa to 24132 kPa (3000-3500 psia). This technology is limited because the vehicles tend to have a relatively short driving range (due to low energy storage per fuel storage container volume), the high storage pressures pose a safety concern, the fuel storage containers tend to be relatively heavy; and the refueling stations tend to be relatively expensive.
LNG technology overcomes some of these limitations, in particular, by providing much more energy per unit volume, lower vehicle fuel system weight and higher fuel storage volume capability. However, the costs of the fuel storage containers are still relatively high, and the need to deliver pressurized natural gas to an engine's fuel injectors adds to the complexity and cost of the fuel delivery system.
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which includes mostly propane, n-butane and/or i-butane, with small amounts of pentane, is an alternative to LNG and CNG which provides similar clean burning characteristics and which overcomes the limitations of both CNG and LNG. LPG provides higher energy storage per vessel volume than either CNG or LNG and operates at relatively low pressures (about 827 kPa (120 psia)), as compared to CNG, and at ambient temperatures. A limitation of using LPG is that the LPG supply is limited and LPG is much more expensive than LNG.
It would be advantageous to provide new methods for preparing LPG. The present invention provides such methods.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An integrated process for improved hydrocarbon recovery is disclosed. The process involves isolating a methane-rich stream for use in hydrocarbon synthesis. The stream is derived from a well gas from a natural gas source. The well gas may also include ethane, an LPG stream (including mainly C3-C5 hydrocarbons) and optionally a C5+ stream (“well gas condensate”). The methane-rich stream is isolated in a first separation zone, along with an LPG stream. Either prior to or following separation in the first separation zone, one or more of the streams may be treated in a hydroconversion reaction zone to remove sulfur compounds contained therein.
The methane-rich stream is converted to syngas and subjected to a hydrocarbon synthesis step, for example, a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis step. The products from the hydrocarbon synthesis step typically include a C1-C4 fraction, at least one low-boiling liquid fraction (generally in the C5-C20 range), and a high-boiling wax fraction (generally in the C20+ ). These fractions are isolated in a second separation zone. The C4− fraction from the synthesis step is combined with the well gas for recovery of LPG and a methane-rich stream (for production of syngas).
The low-boiling liquid fraction and the high-boiling wax fraction are preferably subjected (either separately or in combination) to additional process steps, for example hydrotreatment, hydroisomerization, hydrocracking (particularly in the case of the wax fraction), and the like (hereafter referred to as hydroconversion). The products of the additional process steps are sent to a third separation zone, and yield compositions useful, for example, in fuel-related products (preferably C5-C20 hydrocarbons) and an additional C4− fraction. The additional C1-C4 fraction can also be sent to the first separation zone and treated in an analogous fashion to the C1-C4 fraction from the hydrocarbon synthesis.
In one embodiment, a mixed LPG fraction is recovered from the first separation zone. In a separate embodiment, individual ethane, propane, and butane streams are isolated rather than the mixed LPG fraction. In this embodiment, the first separation zone preferably uses a demethanizer to isolate methane, a de-ethanizer to isolate ethane, and a de-propanizer to isolate propane and butanes.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3852207 (1974-12-01), Stangeland et al.
patent: 3904513 (1975-09-01), Fischer et al.
patent: 4048250 (1977-09-01), Garwood et al.
patent: 4157294 (1979-06-01), Iwao et al.
patent: 4347121 (1982-08-01), Mayer et al.
patent: 4401556 (1983-08-01), Bezman et al.
patent: 4568663 (1986-02-01), Mauldin
patent: 4810357 (1989-03-01), Chester et al.
patent: 4820402 (1989-04-01), Partridge et al.
patent: 4913799 (1990-04-01), Gortsema et al.
patent: 5059567 (1991-10-01), Linsten et al.
patent: 5073530 (1991-12-01), Bezman et al.
patent: 5114563 (1992-05-01), Lok et al.
patent: 5198203 (1993-03-01), Kresge et al.
patent: 5246689 (1993-09-01), Beck et al.
patent: 5334368 (1994-08-01), Beck et al.
patent: 5852061 (1998-12-01), Alexion et al.
patent: 5960643 (1999-10-01), Kuechler et al.
patent: 6147126 (2000-11-01), DeGeorge et al.
patent: 0609079 (1994-08-01), None
patent: 59176388 (1984-10-01), None
patent: 99/13963 (1999-03-01), None
patent: 99/37736 (1999-07-01), None
patent: 99/37741 (1999-07-01), None
patent: 00/00571 (2000-01-01), None
Collins, C., et al., “Trends in NGL Recovery for Natural and Associated Gases”, pp. 287-303 (1985) GasTech LNG/LPG Conference 84. GasTech, Ltd. of Rickmansworth, England.
Beck, J., et al., “A New Family of Mesoporous Molecular Sieves Prepared with Liquid Crystal Templates”,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114: 10834-10843 (1992) American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
Kresge, C., et al., “Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism”,Nature359: 710 (1992).
Ryland, L, et al., “Cracking Catalysts,”Catalysisvol. VII: 1-91 (1960) Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York.
Hilton Grant C.
Jones Clive
Moore, Jr. Richard O.
Pruet Randall B.
Van Gelder Roger D.
Burns Doane Swecker & Mathis L.L.P.
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Parsa Jafar F
LandOfFree
Hydrocarbon recovery in a fischer-tropsch process does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Hydrocarbon recovery in a fischer-tropsch process, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hydrocarbon recovery in a fischer-tropsch process will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3062453