Huff and puff process utilizing nitrogen gas

Details Huff and puff process utilizing nitrogen gas Huff and puff process utilizing nitrogen gas

1999-07-20

2001-06-12

Schoeppel, Roger (Department: 3672)

Wells

Processes

Cyclic injection then production of a single well

C166S279000, C166S305100

Reexamination Certificate

active

06244341

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to enhanced oil recovery processes, and more particularly to a huff and puff process utilizing an injected gas mixture comprising at least about 90% nitrogen by volume.
2. Description of the Prior Art
It has long been known in the oil field that in some instances the recovery of petroleum from an underground formation can be enhanced by a procedure referred to as “cyclic gas recovery” or “huff and puff”.
In a cyclic gas recovery process, a chosen gas is injected into a well, allowed to soak into the formation and subsequently the gas along with the desired hydrocarbons and other fluids are produced back out of the same well into which the injection gas was injected. Thus, the name “huff and puff”.
Many different gases have been utilized as the injection gas in a huff and puff process.
The general engineering theory of the performance of the huff and puff procedure, a history of its development, and a description of the various gases and gas mixtures which have been utilized is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,725,054 to Shayegi et al. That same work is further described in paper no. SPE 36687, presented to the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. in 1996, entitled “Improved Cyclic Stimulation Using Gas Mixtures”, and also in the doctoral dissertation of Sara Shayegi entitled “A VALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE GASES FOR IMMISCIBLE CYCLIC INJECTION” submitted to the Louisiana State University, Department of Petroleum Engineering, in December 1997. The Shayegi references are incorporated herein by reference.
As is apparent from the summary set forth in the Shayegi references, there is a continuing search for improved injection gases to be utilized in huff and puff processes. The most commonly used gases have been steam, carbon dioxide, natural gas and exhaust gas. Previously, pure nitrogen gas has not been utilized in huff and puff procedures. The extensive literature survey conducted by Shayegi et al. as recorded in U.S. Pat. No. 5,725,054, reported at Column 3, Lines 3-4 that “no studies regarding the use of pure nitrogen for cyclic injection have been found in the literature”. The laboratory tests reported by Shayegi et al. compared the use of pure carbon dioxide, pure methane and pure nitrogen, and concluded that nitrogen recovered only about one-half as much additional oil as either pure carbon dioxide or pure methane. See Shayegi et al., SPE 36687, “Improved Cyclic Stimulation Using Gas Mixtures”, at Page 2.
Relatively pure nitrogen gas has been utilized in the prior art for well to well injection processes, as contrasted to huff and puff procedures. Nitrogen has been utilized in oil recovery as a dry gas or attic recovery gas in a displacement process, whereby, the nitrogen is injected into an injection well and oil is displaced to a different production well. Although there is not complete agreement by those skilled in the art as to the physical processes which are occurring in these well stimulation procedures, it is generally understood that the physical phenomena occurring during a well to well gas injection stimulation process are different from those occurring in a huff and puff process.
Additionally, the prior art has recently seen the development of improved apparatus for producing relatively pure nitrogen gas. These developments are summarized in Evison, et al. SPE 24313, entitled “New Developments in Nitrogen in the Oil Industry”, 1992, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. One particular new apparatus for providing purified nitrogen gas is an air separating system utilizing polymeric membranes which separate the nitrogen from the air. The description of various systems for providing purified nitrogen gases as set forth in Evison, et al. is incorporated herein by reference.
Thus, it is seen that there is a continuing need in the oil industry for further improved enhanced oil recovery processes.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an enhanced oil recovery method for producing additional petroleum from existing production wells which penetrate an underground formation. The producing well is shut in. Then a gas mixture containing at least about 90% nitrogen by volume is generated, preferably by separating the gas mixture from air using a membrane separator. The gas mixture is injected down through the well into the formation. The well is then shut in allowing the gas mixture to soak into the formation for a predetermined period of time of at least 7 days and in some cases as much as 180 days or more. Then the well is opened up and additional hydrocarbons are produced back from the same well into which the nitrogen gas was injected.
It is therefore, a general object of the present invention to provide improved enhanced oil recovery methods.
Another object of the present invention is the provision of a huff and puff stimulation procedure utilizing purified nitrogen gas.
Still another object of the present invention is the provision of economical well stimulation well procedures utilizing on-site generated nitrogen gas provided by a membrane separator.
Other and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following disclosure when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3251411 (1966-05-01), Holm
patent: 3493049 (1970-02-01), Matthews et al.
patent: 3674092 (1972-07-01), Bandyopadhyay
patent: 3809159 (1974-05-01), Young et al.
patent: 3938590 (1976-02-01), Redford et al.
patent: 3978925 (1976-09-01), Redford
patent: 4008764 (1977-02-01), Allen
patent: 4250965 (1981-02-01), Wiseman, Jr.
patent: 4327805 (1982-05-01), Poston
patent: 4330038 (1982-05-01), Soukup et al.
patent: 4390068 (1983-06-01), Patton et al.
patent: 4393936 (1983-07-01), Josendal
patent: 4398602 (1983-08-01), Anderson
patent: 4418753 (1983-12-01), Morel et al.
patent: 4488598 (1984-12-01), Duerksen
patent: 4488600 (1984-12-01), Fan et al.
patent: 4544206 (1985-10-01), Wier et al.
patent: 4733724 (1988-03-01), Cardenas et al.
patent: 4844169 (1989-07-01), Sloat
patent: 5515919 (1996-05-01), Stevens et al.
patent: 5634520 (1997-06-01), Stevens et al.
patent: 5725054 (1998-03-01), Shayegi et al.
SPE/DOE 20269 to H.R. Johnson, L.D. Schmidt, and L.D. Thrash, consultants to ICF Resources entitled “A Flue Gas Huff ‘n’ Puff Process for Oil Recovery From Shallow Formations”, copyrighted in 1990.
SPE 24313 to Brian Evison, Niject Services, and R.E. Gilchrist, Ralph E. Gilchrist Inc. entitled “New Developments in Nitrogen in the Oil Industry” coypyrighted in 1992.
SPE 35319 to J. A. Arévalo—V. and F. Samaniego—V., Pemex and UNAM; F.F. López—C. and E. Urquieta—S., IMP entitled “On the Exploitation Conditions of the Akal Reservoir Considering Gas Cap Nitrogen Injection” copyrighted in 1996.
SPE 36687 to Sara Shayegi, SPE, Louisiana State University, Zhengguo Jin, University of Texas—Arlington, Philip Schenewerk, SPE, University of Missouri—Rolla, and Joanne Wolcott, SPE, Louisiana State University entitled “Improved Cyclic Stimulation Using Gas Mixtures” copyrighted in 1996.
SPE 37556 to Delshad, Mohammad, Nedrud, Michael C. entitled “Residual Oil Saturation in a Pure gravity Drainage Regime” copyrighted in 1997.
SPE 39659 to B. Lepski, University of Alberta, Z. Bassiouni, Louisiana State University, J.M. Wolcott, FAI Solutions entitled “Screening of Oil Reservoirs for Gravity Assisted Gas Injection” copyrighted in 1998.
SPE 49169 to Bernard J. Miller/Bretagne G.P.; Terence Hamilton-Smith/Applied Earth Science entitled “Field Case: Cyclic Gas Recovery for Light Oil-Using Carbon Dioxide/Nitrogen/Natural Gas” copyrighted in 1998. (Not Admitted to be Prior Art).
Shayegi, “Evaluation of Alternative Gases for Immiscible Cyclic Injection”, a doctoral dissertation presented to the Department of Petroleum Engineering, Louisiana State University, 1997.
Miller, SPE/DOE 20268, Design and Results of a Shallow, Light Oilfield-Wide Application of CO2Huff ‘n’ Puff Process, 1990.
Evison, et al., “Nitroge

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Huff and puff process utilizing nitrogen gas does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Huff and puff process utilizing nitrogen gas, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Huff and puff process utilizing nitrogen gas will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2477464