Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-13
2003-08-19
Choules, Jack (Department: 2177)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
active
06609124
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a system and method for providing information and more particularly to an improved index that classifies links according to previously categorized data resources.
2. Description of the Related Art
The invention was designed to address the problems that e-business strategy and design consultants have in gathering information to be assessed and analyzed to develop e-business strategies for their external clients. For example, a substantial portion of engagement hours were being consumed by gathering information—instead of assessing and analyzing it.
Prior to the invention, the process of gathering information was very ad hoc in nature; consultants would scour the Web, proprietary research sources, internal databases and use personal contacts to gather recent robust information relevant to their needs. There was no method or common tool that would be the single point of entry to such sources, nor was there a clear understanding of an efficient, best practice method of gathering such data, nor was it obvious as to what information (when found) could be applied to areas of a deliverable. A “deliverable” is an end document or product required by a customer. Consultants therefore found their own methods to gather information and used their own favorite search tools and their own organization capabilities to help relay the information to the project team.
Therefore, there is a need for a system and method that organizes the resources available to e-business strategy and design consultants to reduce the amount of time such consultants spend gathering information and also to provide a system that furnishes the most current form of the resources in question. The invention described below addresses this problem and provides a novel system and method to reduce the time consultants spend gathering information.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention has many goals, including affording a user a tool that enables critical speed to important data, providing a standard method/process for gathering information for e-business strategy engagements, providing a single point of entry to relevant, recent and robust documents and data applicable to e-business strategy engagements, adding value to the research gathering process by organizing the search criteria around standard corporate methods and client deliverables, supporting consultants with intelligent software to aid in targeting their search process, and providing the consulting team a networked space to maintain interesting documents until they become applicable to their analysis.
In one embodiment, the invention comprises a method of searching a computerized network of databases containing documents using a web crawler. The web crawler is provided with conceptual guidelines before the searching. The invention summarizes and performs text clustering on the summaries to produce classifications. The text clustering is performed using seeds based on the conceptual guidelines. The invention then provides, through a user interface, the classifications and a query entry to search the classifications and directs (in response to the query entry) the user to one or more of the classifications, such that the user is directed to the classifications (and hyperlinks to the documents) and the user is not provided the documents themselves.
The invention hyperlinks to the documents in place of providing the documents. The summaries are based upon extensible markup language tags associated with the documents. Links to each of the documents may appear in at least two classes of the classifications. The invention identifies intersections of multiple classes that each respond to a user search. Such intersections represent occurrences of different classes which separately return links to a single document in response to the user search. The conceptual guidelines refine the searching and the text clustering to direct the classifications to a specific result.
Still, there are additional advantages for the consultant in using the invention (which is sometimes referred to herein as “Hub Content Management Tool”, “HCMT” or simply “Hub”) including providing access to proprietary research sources currently expensive to purchase on an individual basis, providing close adherence to the e-business strategy methodology to enable a clear understanding of what is being researched and what needs to be recovered, providing automated taxonomical representations of the data that enables discovery during the search process that would otherwise take hundreds to thousands of hours of intensive reading efforts, and finally storing links to documents, rather than the entire document itself, to afford the user confidence in access to recent information as deemed true by the original source and not the system administrator.
Such advantages contribute to the ultimate benefit, which is that the time spent researching for quality information is dramatically reduced by the technology used in the invention to organize and present the information to the user, specifically around the way consultants work.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5708825 (1998-01-01), Sotomayor
patent: 5873056 (1999-02-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 5895470 (1999-04-01), Pirolli et al.
patent: 5933822 (1999-08-01), Braden-Harder et al.
patent: 5999927 (1999-12-01), Tukey et al.
patent: 6026388 (2000-02-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 6038561 (2000-03-01), Snyder et al.
patent: 6076088 (2000-06-01), Paik et al.
patent: 6088692 (2000-07-01), Driscoll
patent: 6101515 (2000-08-01), Wical et al.
patent: 6131091 (2000-10-01), Light
patent: 6148289 (2000-11-01), Virdy
patent: 6161084 (2000-12-01), Messerly et al.
patent: 6167370 (2000-12-01), Tsourikov et al.
patent: 6189002 (2001-02-01), Roitblat
patent: 6192360 (2001-02-01), Dumais et al.
patent: 6233575 (2001-05-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6304864 (2001-10-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 1 003 111 (1999-11-01), None
Chen et al. Intelligent Spider for Internet Searching, Jan. 1997, Proceedings of the 30ndHawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 178-188.*
Teng et al “Collaborative Web Crawling: Information Gathering/ Processing over Internet” Jan. 1999 Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1-12.
Chow Amy W.
Danke Michael J.
Pietrzak Julie J.
Proctor Larry L.
Smierciak Edward L.
Anderson, Esq. Jay H.
Choules Jack
McGinn & Gibb PLLC
LandOfFree
Hub for strategic intelligence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Hub for strategic intelligence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hub for strategic intelligence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3107335