Highly linear and low noise figure mixer

Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices – circuits – and – Specific input to output function – Combining of plural signals

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C327S065000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06542019

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1). Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a signal processing circuit, and, more particularly, to an improved transconductance stage for a MOS mixer circuit.
(2). Description of the Prior Art
Mixer circuits are widely used in modern communication systems. Mixer circuits have a number of uses. A typical application is for translating signals into desirable frequency bands through a technique called modulation. In a mixing or modulation process, an information signal is superimposed upon a carrier signal. In this way, the information signal may be processed or even transmitted without information loss. Another principle application is for demodulation. In demodulation, a modulated information signal is translated down to an intermediate frequency.
Mixers must be designed to minimize intermodulation distortion. This distortion is principally caused by non-linear translations of the input signal and greatly affects the dynamic range of the communication system. Further, mixers should sustain large interference signals without desensitizing. At the same time, the mixer must maintain a low noise figure to optimize the overall system performance.
Referring now to
FIG. 1
, a prior art mixing circuit is illustrated. The mixer
10
comprises a transconductance stage
14
, a double-balanced cell
18
, and a load stage
22
. In a typical configuration, the information signal is INPUT
1
. INPUT
1
is a differential voltage that is herein labeled INPUT
1
&phgr;
1
26
and INPUT
1
&phgr;
2
30
.
INPUT
1
is processed through a transconductance stage
14
. The transconductance stage performs a voltage-to-current conversion to create the differential current I
1&phgr;1
34
and I
1&phgr;2
38
. Ideally, the differential currents I
1&phgr;1
34
and I
1&phgr;2
38
are linearly proportional to the differential voltages of INPUT
1
&phgr;
1
26
and INPUT
1
&phgr;
2
30
. The transconductance stage
14
typically comprises a balanced transistor pair as shown in FIG.
2
and as discussed in detail below.
Referring again to
FIG. 1
, the double-balanced cell
18
is used to commutate the differential currents I
1&phgr;1
34
and I
1&phgr;2
38
onto the INPUT
2
signal. INPUT
2
is typically a carrier signal, such as a local oscillator (LO). Again, INPUT
2
is a differential voltage input labeled INPUT
2
&phgr;
1
42
and INPUT
2
&phgr;
2
46
. The double-balanced cell
18
typically comprises a Gilbert cell, as is well established in the art. The double-balanced cell commutates INPUT
2
&phgr;
1
42
and INPUT
2
&phgr;
2
46
with I
1&phgr;1
34
and I
1&phgr;2
38
to create the differential output currents I
2&phgr;1
50
and I
2&phgr;2
54
.
The load stage
22
is used to convert the differential output currents I
2&phgr;1
50
and I
2&phgr;2
54
into an output voltage, OUTPUT. The load stage
22
typically comprises a set of matching resistors that establish a voltage drop in direct proportion to the differential current I
2&phgr;1
50
and I
2&phgr;2
54
. Alternatively, the load stage may comprise an R-C load, an inductive load, a capacitance load, or a set of transistors for further linearity improvement. Once again, the output voltage, OUTPUT, is a differential voltage comprising OUTPUT &phgr;
1
60
and OUTPUT &phgr;
2
64
.
The conventional mixer illustrated in
FIG. 1
is an active CMOS mixer. That is, the mixing, or commutating, process is performed with active components such as MOS transistors. Compared to passive CMOS mixers, active mixers provide improved conversion gain and better system noise performance. However, the linearity is generally significantly worse.
Referring now again to
FIG. 2
, a typical configuration of the transconductance stage is shown. The circuit uses two NMOS transistors, M
1
80
and M
2
84
, configured as a balanced pair. In this scheme, a matched pair of NMOS transistors is used. Each device
80
and
84
has the same length and width, the same threshold voltage (V
th
) , the same processing parameters, and the same orientation on the substrate. The sources of the transistors
80
and
84
are coupled together and are additionally coupled to a constant current source I
s
88
. The gates of the transistors
80
and
84
are coupled to the differential input nodes INPUT &phgr;
1
92
and INPUT &phgr;
2
94
. The drains of the transistors
80
and
84
are coupled to the double-balanced cell (not shown) as in FIG.
1
.
The analysis of the balanced pair is very well known in the art as given by, for example, Gray and Meyer,
Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits
, John Wiley & Sons, 1984, pp. 705-709. Of particular importance to the transconductance stage of the mixer, is the transconductance performance of this cell.
Referring now to
FIG. 3
, the transconductance performance is illustrated. The differential input voltage INPUT &phgr;
1
92
and INPUT &phgr;
2
94
is plotted as &Dgr;V
&phgr;1-&phgr;2
. The differential output current OUTPUT &phgr;
1
96
and OUTPUT &phgr;
2
98
is plotted as &Dgr;I
&phgr;1-&phgr;2
. The inherent offset voltage needed to insure that the balanced pair is operating in the linear range is neglected in this plot. As the differential input voltage &Dgr;V
&phgr;1-&phgr;2
sweeps from a negative to a positive value, the differential current &Dgr;I
&phgr;1-&phgr;2
is generated as shown by plots
100
,
104
, and
108
.
Each plot
100
,
104
, and
108
, represents a different operating condition for the balanced pair. For example, plot
100
represents a condition where there is a small difference between the gate-to-source voltage V
gs
and V
th
. In this case, the balanced pair exhibits a linear transfer only over a relatively small input voltage range, R
1
. By comparison, plot
104
and plot
108
demonstrate how the linear range can be increased by increasing the relative gate drive. The input range R
2
for plot
108
is much larger than R
1
and would, therefore, allow a much larger input voltage swing.
Alternatively, the same increase in input range can be achieved by holding the gate-to-source drive constant but reducing the size of the MOS transistors. The size may be reduced by reducing the width-to-length (W/L) ratio of each device. A pair of small MOS transistors will exhibit an increased linear range as shown by plot
108
.
Unfortunately, simply decreasing the transistor size (or simply increasing the gate drive) has the undesirable effect of increasing the noise figure for the transconductance stage. This effect puts a limit on the effectiveness of using simple device size choices to improve the circuit performance. It is desirable to achieve the improved linearity of a small MOS pair and the improved noise figure of a large MOS pair in a single circuit.
Several prior art inventions describe mixer circuits. U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,791 to Gilbert describes a mixer comprising bipolar transistors. A multi-tanh doublet transconductance stage is used to improve linearity. U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,883 to Gilbert teaches bipolar multi-tanh cells wherein ratios of emitter areas and emitter resistors are used to increase the input voltage range of a voltage-to-current converter. U.S. Pat. No. 5,532,637 to Khoury et al discloses a bipolar mixer with a transconductance stage. Degeneration emitter resistors are used to expand the input voltage range. U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,446 to Cranford, Jr. et al shows a CMOS analog multiplier circuit with an extended input range. Finally, the present invention is disclosed by the Applicants in the technical paper by Lim et al, titled “A Fully Integrated CMOS RF Front-End with On-Chip VCO for WCDMA Application,” published in the Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2001, Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC, 01 IEEE International, 2001, pages 286, 287, and 455.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A principal object of the present invention is to provide an effective and very manufacturable transconductance stage for a MOS mixer circuit.
A further object of the present invention is to improve the linearity and noise figure of a transconductance stage of a MOS mixer circuit.
A s

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Highly linear and low noise figure mixer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Highly linear and low noise figure mixer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Highly linear and low noise figure mixer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3023710

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.