High transmittance, low emissivity coatings for substrates

Details High transmittance, low emissivity coatings for substrates High transmittance, low emissivity coatings for substrates

1997-03-11

2003-02-25

Turner, Archene (Department: 1775)

Stock material or miscellaneous articles

Structurally defined web or sheet

Including components having same physical characteristic in...

C428S336000, C428S432000, C428S433000, C428S472000, C428S701000, C428S697000, C428S702000, C359S359000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06524688

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to coatings for substrates and particularly to substantially transparent coatings for transparent substrates such as glass.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
High visible transmittance, low emissivity coatings applied to transparent substrates such as glass are characterized by their ability to transmit visible light while minimizing the transmittance of other wavelengths of light, such as light in the infrared spectrum. This characteristic is particularly useful for reducing radiative heat transfer without impairing visibility, such as in architectural glass or automobile windows. For aesthetic reasons, in many such applications it is important to maintain reflection relatively consistent throughout the visible spectrum so that the coating has a “neutral” color, i.e., is essentially colorless.
Generally speaking, such high transmittance, low emissivity coatings comprise a “film stack” having at least one thin metallic film or layer with high infrared reflectance and low transmissivity disposed between metal oxide layers. The metallic layer may be virtually any reflective metal, such as silver, copper or gold, with silver being the most frequently-used metal for this application due to its relatively neutral color. Metal oxides useful in high transmittance, low emissivity films include oxides of titanium, hafnium, zirconium, niobium, zinc, bismuth, indium and tin. Prior art systems have also employed oxides of metal alloys, such as zinc stannate or oxides of indium/tin alloys.
The metal oxide layers of such coatings serve two important functions. First, they serve to reduce the visible reflection of the film stack, enhancing transmittance. The metal oxides used in these layers should have a relatively high index of refraction, e.g., on the order of 2.0 or more, in order to achieve this end. According to commonly accepted principles in the art, the metal oxide layer between the transparent (e.g., glass) substrate and the first metallic layer must be at least 300 Angstroms (A) in order to obtain a neutral, high transmitting coating; such layers more commonly are between about 400 and 700 A in thickness.
Second, the metal oxide layers should serve to protect the reflective metal layer from the environment. Once such coated substrates are assembled and installed for use, the film stack is frequently isolated from contact with the environment, as by disposing the film stack between two spaced panes of glass in a composite window structure. However, before these products are assembled, the film stack is frequently subjected to relatively harsh conditions, such as by handling, shipping or washing.
A variety of attempts have been made to enhance the ability of the metal oxide layers to protect the reflective metal layer in such film stacks. For instance, Gillery, et al. teach the use of titanium oxide as a protective overcoat in U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,563, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference. Although Gillery, et al. explain that titanium oxides achieve the best results, they note that such an overcoat could be formed of a metal instead of a metal oxide; titanium and alloys of iron or nickel are listed as prime candidates for such a metal layer. Gillery, et al. also teach that certain other oxides simply lack the requisite durability to be used as a protective overcoat. Zinc oxide, bismuth oxide and tin oxide are all listed as having undesirable properties, such as a lack of durability, which make them unsuitable for a protective overcoat.
However, it has been found that the use of a titanium oxide overcoat such as that taught by Gillery, et al. is particularly prone to scratching or abrasion during shipping and washing operations. For instance, when coated substrates are washed before being assembled into a final product, the film stack comes into physical contact with a washing apparatus. It has been found that such a washing stage can physically abrade an overcoat of titanium oxide or the like, noticeably degrading the appearance of the finished article.
The particular composition of the layers of a film stack, as well as their relative thicknesses, must be carefully chosen in order to achieve the desired properties in the coated substrate. As noted above, in addition to maximizing visible transmittance while minimizing emissivity, in many instances it is desirable that a film stack have a neutral color. It has been possible to provide coatings for substrates which have an acceptable neutral color in transmission when viewed at an angle of incidence generally perpendicular to the plane of the film. However, as the angle of incidence is decreased, the film stack will tend to exhibit increasing color in transmission. It has been noted that film stacks which are nearly completely neutral when viewed at a perpendicular angle will tend to exhibit a distinct, visible color when viewed at a more acute angle. Windows of buildings or cars are viewed from various angles, of course, so variations in color of film stacks can frequently be detected in use.
It would be desirable to provide a film stack which serves as a high visible transmittance, low emissivity coating for a substrate, yet remains substantially neutral at a wide range of angles of incidence. Additionally, it would be desirable to provide the film stack with a protective coating which can withstand the rigors of normal handling associated with such substrates.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a high transmittance, low emissivity film stack having a base coat formed of a metal oxide which is desirably no more than about 275 Angstroms thick. This thickness is generally considered in the prior art to be too thin to provide the necessary antireflection between the substrate and the overlying reflective metal layer. We have found, unexpectedly, that a metal oxide base coat formed at thickness of 275 A and below can adequately serve its antireflective function. In addition to having obvious economic benefits due to the reduction in materials and energy necessary to apply the base coat, reducing the base coat in accordance with the present invention has surprisingly been found to achieve significant improvements in the color neutrality of the film stack. In particular, this relatively thin base coat enables construction of a film stack that exhibits a neutral color at a much wider range of angles of incidence than commonly associated with prior art film stacks.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a film stack including a thin base coat of the invention also includes an outer layer of an oxide of a metal chosen from the group of zinc, tin, indium, or bismuth, or an alloy including such a metal. This overcoat layer is applied at a thickness which will not substantially affect the optical properties of the coated substrate if the overcoat is damaged or rubbed off. It has been found that a film stack which includes an overcoat according to this embodiment exhibits significantly enhanced physical durability as compared to a film stack without such an overcoat.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3519339 (1970-07-01), Hutchinson et al.
patent: 3649359 (1972-03-01), Apfel et al.
patent: 3682528 (1972-08-01), Apfel et al.
patent: RE27473 (1972-09-01), Mauer
patent: 3758185 (1973-09-01), Gelber
patent: 3889026 (1975-06-01), Groth
patent: 3978272 (1976-08-01), Donley
patent: 3990784 (1976-11-01), Gelber
patent: 4017661 (1977-04-01), Gillery
patent: 4045125 (1977-08-01), Farges
patent: 4179181 (1979-12-01), Chang
patent: 4337990 (1982-07-01), Fan et al.
patent: 4368945 (1983-01-01), Fujimori et al.
patent: 4413877 (1983-11-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 4419386 (1983-12-01), Gordon
patent: 4462883 (1984-07-01), Hart
patent: 4497700 (1985-02-01), Groth et al.
patent: 4512863 (1985-04-01), Criss et al.
patent: 4532181 (1985-07-01), Brill et al.
patent: 4556277 (1985-12-01), Fan et al.
patent: 4563400 (1986-01-01), Criss et al.
patent: 4594137 (1986-06-01), Gillery et al.
patent: 4639069 (1987-01-01), Yatabe et al.
patent: 4716086 (1987-12-01), Gillery et

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

High transmittance, low emissivity coatings for substrates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with High transmittance, low emissivity coatings for substrates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High transmittance, low emissivity coatings for substrates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3177821