Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – With particular coupling link
Reexamination Certificate
1998-04-21
2001-09-25
Crosland, Donnie L. (Department: 2632)
Communications: electrical
Condition responsive indicating system
With particular coupling link
C340S514000, C455S039000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06294992
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to communication devices and protocols such as those used in wireless security systems having multiple alarm sensors in communication with one or more control systems; and in particular to such security systems where the transmitter is designed to transmit messages at different power levels.
Wireless transmissions in the United States are regulated by the Federal government. Agencies outside of the United States regulate wireless transmissions, as well. For example, wireless transmissions in Europe are regulated by such agencies as European Telecom Standards Institute (ETSI) and other national agencies. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues federal regulations affecting wireless data transmissions. These regulations are found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47, Part 15 (47 CFR §15). The term “message”, as used herein, generally refers to the information content of a signal, whereas the term “signal” generally refers to the actual transmission and its electromagnetic properties. However, these terms may be used interchangeably in order to promote clarity within a particular context.
The FCC allocates frequency bands for certain types of wireless transmissions. These frequency bands are either “licensed” or “license exempt”. If a wireless transmitter is designed to transmit within a frequency for which a license is required (a “licensed frequency”), the operator of the wireless equipment must pay the government a license fee for each radio installed. If a wireless transmitter is designed to transmit within a frequency for which no license is required (a “license exempt frequency”), no license fee is required. For wireless transmission applications having a large number of transmitters, or where the overall wireless information system is inexpensive, the license fee is prohibitively expensive for a commercially competitive product.
The FCC also designates wireless transmissions as either a primary or a secondary user of a frequency. A primary user of a frequency is one that the FCC protects from interference by other transmissions. One example of a primary user is an airport instrument landing system. Such users are protected from interference by not allowing other transmissions on the delegated frequency band because these transmissions guide airplanes to safe landings. Secondary users of frequencies do not enjoy this protection from interference. Secondary frequencies include, for example, frequencies for garage door openers and remote controls. These systems do not involve the same safety considerations that necessitate FCC protection.
The FCC imposes several constraints on license exempt, secondary transmissions. Federal regulations require that the transmissions maximum field strength be calculated as the average field strength over a complete pulse train, provided that the pulse train does not exceed 100 ms. If the pulse train exceeds 100 ms, the field strength is determined as the average absolute voltage over 100 ms. If the emissions are pulsed, rather than constant, the emissions may be transmitted in less than 100 ms, rather than spread out over the entire 100 ms. Because the field strength of pulsed emissions are measured as an average over a 100 ms period, the field strength transmitted during this time may be greater than that which may be transmitted if sent by a constant signal over the entire 100 ms period. For example, if a pulsed signal train is “on the air” for only 50 ms of the 100 ms period, it may be transmitted with double the maximum field strength of a substantially similar constant signal. The FCC limits the transmission of the total allowed power to no less than 10% of the allotted time (i.e., no less than 10 ms). That is, the peak power cannot exceed one hundred times the average allowed power over the entire 100 ms period. These parameters create an incentive to reduce the transmission “on time” to as small as possible (down to 10 ms) to allow for greater transmission power than if the signal was “on” for the entire 100 ms period.
For this reason, certain transmission types are preferred over others for license exempt, secondary transmission applications. For example, frequency modulation (FM) signals are not preferred because they are constantly “on”. On-off-keyed amplitude modulation (OOK-AM) is preferred because the signal is off except when data is being transmitted (i.e, not unlike Morse code), and it is inexpensive and simple to implement. Additional encoding schemes which are commonly used include pulse position modulation (PPM) (where the position of a pulse in a self-clocked signal conveys data) and biphase Manchester (where the transition of a signal from one value to another within a bit interval conveys data and the clock).
Constant carrier signals (i.e., constantly “on”) are not preferred because they cannot take as much advantage of peak to average power ratio calculation when compared with, for instance, a constant carrier signal such as OOK-AM. For example, a Manchester encoded OOK-AM signal containing 10 bits of information will be on no more than 50% of the on-air time. Thus, the transmission can occupy 20 ms and will have an average “on time” of 10% of the FCC average period. On the other hand, a constant carrier FM signal can occupy only 10 ms periods in order to satisfy the FCC averaging limitation. Therefore, to transmit 10 bits of information, the amplitude modulation can be sent at 10 bits/20 ms=500 Hz data rate, whereas the constant carrier signal must be sent at 10 bits/10 ms=1 KHz in order to take advantage of the full 10% averaging permitted by the FCC. Because the FM data rate is higher, the receiver bandwidths must be wider thus compromising the receiver sensitivity and selectivity.
The PPM and biphase Manchester techniques are often preferred because they efficiently use the power/time (duty cycle) constraints and because they are self-clocking (i.e., the techniques transmit a synchronization pulse or edge from which the position of the data pulse is compared). Self-clocking signals are often preferred because the data timing in the inexpensive transmitters is often poor and, therefore, self-clocking signals are necessary for the receiver or decoder to operate satisfactorily.
Another technique, the non-return-to-zero (NRZ) technique, transmits digital information, and is only “on” (i.e., it only transmits) when the digital signal is a logical “1. This technique is quite efficient and can operate at less than half the data rate of the PPM or biphase Manchester techniques for equal information transfer. This is because in the biphase Manchester technique each bit-cell is divided by 2 to provide the transitions. PPM requires two or more bit cells to convey information depending on the number of possible pulse positions. The NRZ information is conveyed in a single bit-cell, thus, the bit rate equals the baud rate because each bit is equal to the clock rate. However, the NRZ technique duty cycle is entirely dependent on the data content. This means that the more “1's” contained in the digital data signal, the more “on-air” time needed to transmit the signal. Thus, it is at least equally likely that there will be more than 50% “1's”. An NRZ signal may not be able to take advantage of the peak-to-average-power ratio because it will be “on air” for more than the minimum regulatory averaging period, reducing the power which may be used to transmit the signal. Also NRZ is not self clocking. For these reasons, NRZ has not previously been preferred for use in prior license exempt, secondary wireless transmission systems.
Governmental and commercial constraints placed on license exempt bands impose conflicting requirements for wireless security systems. The relatively low power level permitted requires (1) as short a transmission on time as possible, and (2) a highly sensitive receiver to reliably detect transmissions at a reasonable distance. The license exempt bands are secondary frequency bands, which h
Adamo Patrick
Addy Kenneth L.
Schmit Thomas P.
Barkume Anthony R.
Crosland Donnie L.
Greenberg & Traurig, LLP
Pittway Corp.
LandOfFree
High power control signal transmission and low power data... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with High power control signal transmission and low power data..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High power control signal transmission and low power data... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2526272