Power plants – Reaction motor – Liquid oxidizer
Reexamination Certificate
2002-03-22
2003-07-08
Freay, Charles G. (Department: 3746)
Power plants
Reaction motor
Liquid oxidizer
Reexamination Certificate
active
06588199
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to the field of rocket engines and, more particularly, to an improved rocket engine combustion chamber design and method of making the same, wherein the combustion chamber has a first smaller diameter, film-cooled surface portion adjacent to a propellant injector and steps suddenly outward to a second larger-diameter portion at a position spaced away from the propellant injector, wherein the film cooling, together with the sudden expansion of the diameter of the combustion chamber, results in an exceptionally high degree of combustion efficiency.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The field of rocket science has advanced rapidly during the latter half of the Twentieth Century from its relatively primitive beginnings. Early rockets were essentially experimental, pilotless aircraft, which were operated by crude control systems. The tremendous technological advances in rocket propulsion have been accompanied by similar advances in other essential fields—such as electronics, inertial guidance and control systems, aerodynamics, and material sciences. As a result, rockets today are manufactured for a variety of purposes, ranging from military applications to carrying scientific instruments for use in gathering information at high altitudes, either within or above the earth's atmosphere.
While such rockets may vary considerably, both in application as well as size, they all include three essential components: a guidance and control system, a mission payload that is to be carried by the rocket, and a power source for propelling them. The first of these components is the guidance and control system that controls the flight path of the rocket. The second of the aforementioned components is the mission payload, which, as mentioned above, may vary widely, varying from scientific instruments to surveillance equipment to explosive warheads.
It is the third of the three essential components of a rocket—namely, the power source—that is the focus of the present invention. This power source is typically a self contained rocket engine. Three different types of rocket engines have been predominantly utilized in the past—namely, solid propellant systems, liquid bipropellant systems, and liquid or gaseous monopropellant systems. Solid propellant systems present several significant disadvantages not found in liquid bipropellant and monopropellant systems. For example, solid propellant systems are relatively heavy, have lower attainable exhaust velocities, and offer poor control of operating level in flight (throttleability).
Liquid bipropellant systems use an oxidizer and a fuel that are tanked separately and mixed in the combustion chamber. Typically, such liquid bipropellant systems use hydrazine or monomethylhydrazine as the fuel and nitrogen tetroxide as the oxidizer. In some applications, bipropellant systems use gels instead of liquids. Liquid monopropellant systems typically also use hydrazine as a monopropellant fuel. Since liquid bipropellant systems are more widely used, the discussion that follows focuses on such systems.
The typical components of a liquid bipropellant propulsion system are the rocket engine, fuel tanks, and a vehicle structure to maintain these parts in place and connect them to the mission payload. The liquid bipropellant rocket engine itself consists of a main chamber for mixing and burning the fuel and the oxidizer, with the fore end occupied by fuel and oxidizer manifolds and injectors, and the aft end comprising a nozzle. The oxidizer and the fuel are transferred from their respective tanks by pumps or may be pressurized by gas and are supplied to the injector manifold at a high pressure. The oxidizer and the fuel are then injected into the combustion chamber in a manner that assures atomization and mixing so that they may be efficiently reacted to produce thrust from the rocket engine.
Two problems that must be faced in the implementation of a rocket engine design are maximizing the efficiency of combustion and dealing with the problem of heat in the rocket engine. It will at once be appreciated by those skilled in the art that it is desirable to have a combustion efficiency approaching as close as possible to 100%. In addition, those skilled in the art will also realize that the hot gas chemical and temperature environments of a rocket engine, if left unchecked, may damage or destroy the combustion chamber during the desired lifetime of the rocket engine (which is typically in the range of 35,000-100,000 seconds).
The main combustion chamber of larger rocket engines typically uses regenerative propellant cooling, in which the combustion chamber includes a coolant jacket through which liquid propellant (usually fuel) is circulated at rates high enough to allow the rocket engine to operate continuously without an excessive increase in the combustion chamber wall temperature. Smaller rocket engines instead use direct rejection of heat from the combustion chamber to the space environment by radiation heat transfer.
Effective cooling of a liquid rocket engine in the thrust range of 1 Newton to 10,000 Newtons is typically accomplished by using liquid or gaseous film cooling of the combustion chamber wall, which establishes a stratified layer of low temperature fluid adjacent to the inner wall of the combustion chamber. This is accomplished by establishing a film cooling injection pattern and a main core injection pattern, wherein the injectors provide a primary inner core of high temperature gases and a peripheral layer of low temperature unmixed and partially mixed propellant gases. The unmixed propellant used for the film cooling and partially mixed propellants must then be reacted in a rapid and efficient manner in order to provide a maximum, specific impulse efficiency rocket engine.
Several patents that are relevant to the present invention may be reviewed as background information. These patents are U.S. Pat. No. 3,074,469, to Babbitt et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,748, to Sujata etal.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,915,038, also to Sujata et al.—all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,904, to Schoenman, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,091, also to Schoenman. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,074,469; 4,785,748; 4,882,904; 4,915,038; and 4,936,091, are each hereby incorporated herein by reference.
It is accordingly one of the principal objectives of the present invention that it result in a rocket engine having a design and method of manufacture that provide a highly effective cooling mechanism, which protects the combustion chamber from damage or destruction caused by high temperature conditions. It is a further objective of the present invention that it minimizes or eliminates the reactions that take place between the incompletely reacted fuel and oxidizer products and the combustion chamber wall materials. It is a related objective of the present invention that it optimizes the temperature gradients between the various components of the rocket engine to provide effective cooling and minimize structural and thermal stresses.
It is another of the principal advantages of the present invention that it enhances the combustion efficiency of the rocket engine to the maximum degree possible. It is accordingly an objective of the present invention that the rocket engine combustion chamber be of a design that promotes a complete mixing of the propellants such that they may be completely reacted within the combustion chamber. It is a related objective of the present invention that mixing of the main core of gas with the film cooling layer is accomplished after the need for the film cooling layer is no longer required, but before the unmixed and unreacted propellants leave the combustion chamber.
The stepped expansion combustion chamber rocket engine of the present invention must be of a construction that is both durable and long lasting, and it must also require that no maintenance be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. In order to enhance the market appeal of the stepped ex
Jensen Jeffrey J.
Neiderman Joel M.
Stechman, Jr. Rupert C.
Woll Peter E.
Aerojet-General Corporation
Christensen O'Connor Johnson & Kindness PLLC
Freay Charles G.
LandOfFree
High performance rocket engine having a stepped expansion... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with High performance rocket engine having a stepped expansion..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High performance rocket engine having a stepped expansion... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3090716