Gas separation: processes – With control responsive to sensed condition – Concentration sensed
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-23
2004-03-09
Hopkins, Robert A. (Department: 1724)
Gas separation: processes
With control responsive to sensed condition
Concentration sensed
C095S031000, C055S434000, C096S417000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06702873
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to aeronautical vehicle systems, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for separating particles from an induced fluid within an aeronautical vehicle engine.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
During operation of an aeronautical vehicle, fluids are forced into an engine and are used to generate energy to propel the vehicle. The fluids may contain undesirable particles, such as sand and dust, which can cause degradation of engine components. In order to prevent the degradation of engine components, the undesirable particles are separated from the fluids using an inertial inlet particle separator.
Referring now to
FIG. 1
, a quarter cross-sectional view of a traditional inertial inlet particle separator
10
is shown. The separator
10
includes a duct system
12
having a scavenge channel
14
that forms an in-line fluid path with a fluid inlet
18
, represented by arrow
16
, and a clean intake channel
20
that branches off from the in-line fluid path
16
. The duct system
12
is divided via a splitter
22
to form the scavenge channel
14
and the clean intake channel
20
. A clean intake channel opening
24
is defined by the splitter
22
on a first side
26
and a hub
28
on a second side
30
.
Fluid contaminated with particles has a higher inertia than fluid without particles. This being the case, contaminated fluid tends to flow straight into the scavenge channel
14
rather than over and around the hub
28
, which has a radius of curvature with a tangential angle
32
. The angle
32
is generally defined by two vectors lying tangentially on the innermost curvatures of side
30
, intersecting over hub
28
at a point
36
. The contaminated fluid is guided from the scavenge channel into a blower where it is then discharged. Relatively, uncontaminated fluid flows into the clean intake channel
20
, over the hub
28
, where it is then further guided into the engine. Approximately, 15-25% of the fluid entering the fluid inlet
18
, containing larger captured particles, enter the scavenge channel
14
, while the remaining fluid and lighter particles enters the clean intake channel
20
. Thus, a small percentage of particles enter the engine through the clean intake channel
20
, thereby protecting engine componentry.
Particle separation efficiency may be minimally increased by decreasing the size of the clean intake channel opening
24
or by decreasing the angle
32
between a fluid inlet portion
34
of the system
12
and the hub
28
. While both methods of increasing efficiency are effective, both methods have an adverse effect of raising the pressure loss of the air entering the engine, with an attendant decrease in power and increase in fuel consumption. Also, the separator
10
has a fixed geometry, such that in order to alter or adjust performance of the separator
10
, the separator
10
needs to be redesigned and remanufactured. The redesign and remanufacturing of the separator
10
results in additional costs. Additionally, being that the separator
10
is rigid the separator is unable to compensate for changing contamination conditions, thereby limiting performance characteristics of the separator
10
.
There is a continuous effort to improve the functionality and efficiency of aeronautical vehicles. Therefore, it would be desirable to provide an improved method and apparatus for separating particles from an induced fluid within an aeronautical vehicle engine. The method and apparatus should provide the ability to adjust particle separation efficiency and pressure loss of the separator.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The foregoing and other advantages are provided by a method and apparatus for separating particles from an induced fluid within an vehicle engine. An inertial inlet particle separator system for an aeronautical vehicle engine is provided. The system includes a particle sensor that generates a contamination signal. An inertial inlet particle separator is also included in the system and has a fluid parameter adjusting system mechanically coupled within the inertial inlet particle separator. A controller is electrically coupled to the particle sensor and the fluid parameter adjusting system. The controller adjusts a fluid parameter of the inertial inlet particle separator in response to the contamination signal. A method of performing the same is also provided.
One of several advantages of the present invention is that it provides an improved apparatus and method for separating particles from an induced fluid within an aeronautical vehicle engine by providing an ability to adjust fluid parameters within the inertial inlet particle separator in response to a contamination level. The aforementioned allows for relatively high efficiency of fuel consumption and high power during low induced fluid contamination levels and relatively high engine protection during high contamination levels.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it provides flexibility in the manner as to which the fluid parameters are adjusted including altering channel wall shape, splitter length, clean fluid intake opening size, and various other alterable fluid parameters. The flexibility allows for increased fine-tuning of efficiency and power.
Furthermore the present invention allows for fluid flow adjustments during multiple operating speeds of travel. Adjustable fluid flow allows the amount of fluid being discharged to be limited at higher travel speeds, which increases power and decreases fuel consumption when because of inertial effects typically a larger portion of the induced fluid tends to be discharged. Also, adjustable fluid flow allows the present invention to increase fluid flow into an intake portion of an engine and maintain power, rather than experiencing a reduction in power due to a higher contaminated equivalent fluid flow.
The present invention itself, together with attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3338049 (1967-08-01), Fernberger
patent: 3436910 (1969-04-01), Haworth
patent: 3521431 (1970-07-01), Connors et al.
patent: 3534548 (1970-10-01), Connors
patent: 3733814 (1973-05-01), Hull, Jr. et al.
patent: 3993463 (1976-11-01), Barr
patent: 4004760 (1977-01-01), Ando et al.
patent: 4190217 (1980-02-01), O'Connor
patent: 4250703 (1981-02-01), Norris et al.
patent: 4397431 (1983-08-01), Ben-Porat
patent: 4509962 (1985-04-01), Breitman et al.
patent: 4617028 (1986-10-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5039317 (1991-08-01), Thompson et al.
patent: 5123240 (1992-06-01), Frost et al.
patent: 5222693 (1993-06-01), Slutzkin et al.
patent: 5279109 (1994-01-01), Liu et al.
Clement David J.
Hopkins Robert A.
The Boeing Company
LandOfFree
High particle separation efficiency system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with High particle separation efficiency system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High particle separation efficiency system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3198441