Optical: systems and elements – Polarization without modulation – By relatively adjustable superimposed or in series polarizers
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-01
2001-10-23
Shafer, Ricky D. (Department: 2872)
Optical: systems and elements
Polarization without modulation
By relatively adjustable superimposed or in series polarizers
C359S490020, C359S490020, C359S487030, C359S199200, C359S199200, C359S199200, C385S011000, C385S031000, C385S033000, C356S519000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06307677
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to fiber optic networks, and more particularly to fiber optic dense wavelength division multiplexers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Fiber optic networks are becoming increasingly popular for data transmission due to their high speed and high data capacity capabilities. Multiple wavelengths may be transmitted along the same optic fiber. This totality of multiple combined wavelengths comprises a single transmitted signal. A crucial feature of a fiber optic network is the separation of the optical signal into its component wavelengths, or “channels”, typically by a wavelength division multiplexer. This separation must occur in order for the exchange of wavelengths between signals on “loops” within networks to occur The exchange occurs at connector points, or points where two or more loops intersect for the purpose of exchanging wavelengths.
Add/drop systems exist at the connector points for the management of the channel exchanges. The exchanging of data signals involves the exchanging of matching wavelengths from two different loops within an optical network. In other words, each signal drops a channel to the other loop while simultaneously adding the matching channel from the other loop.
FIG. 1
illustrates a simplified optical network
100
. A fiber optic network
100
could comprise a main loop
150
which connects primary locations, such as San Francisco and New York. In-between the primary locations is a local loop
110
which connects with loop
150
at connector point
140
. Thus, if local loop
110
is Sacramento, wavelengths at San Francisco are multiplexed into an optical signal which will travel from San Francisco, add and drop channels with Sacramento's signal at connector point
140
, and the new signal will travel forward to New York. Within loop
110
, optical signals would be transmitted to various locations within its loop, servicing the Sacramento area. Local receivers (not shown) would reside at various points within the local loop
110
to convert the optical signals into the electrical signals in the appropriate protocol format.
The separation of an optical signal into its component channels is typically performed by a dense wavelength division multiplexer.
FIG. 2
illustrates add/drop systems
200
and
210
with dense wavelength division multiplexers
220
and
230
. An optical signal from Loop
110
(&lgr;
1
-&lgr;
n
) enters its add/drop system
200
at node A (
240
). The signal is separated into its component channels by the dense wavelength division multiplexer
220
. Each channel is then outputted to its own path
250
-
1
through
250
-n. For example, &lgr;
1
would travel along path
250
-
1
, &lgr;
2
would travel along path
250
-
2
, etc. In the same manner, the signal from Loop
150
(&lgr;
1
′-&lgr;
n
′) enters its add/drop system
210
via node C (
270
). The signal is separated into its component channels by the wavelength division multiplexer
230
. Each channel is then outputted via its own path
280
-
1
through
280
-n. For example, &lgr;
1
′ would travel along path
280
-
1
, &lgr;
2
′ would travel along path
280
-
2
, etc.
In the performance of an add/drop function, for example, &lgr;
1
, is transferred from path
250
-
1
to path
280
-
1
. It is combined with the others of Loop
150
's channels into a single new optical signal by the dense wavelength division multiplexer
230
. The new signal is then returned to Loop
150
via node D (
290
). At the same time, &lgr;
1
′ is transferred from path
280
-
1
to path
250
-
1
. It is combined with the others of Loop
110
's channels into a single optical signal by the dense wavelength division multiplexer
220
. This new signal is then returned to Loop
110
via node B (
260
). In this manner, from Loop
110
's frame of reference, channel &lgr;
1
of its own signal is dropped to Loop
150
while channel &lgr;
1
′ of the signal from Loop
150
is added to form part of its new signal. The opposite is true from Loop
150
's frame of reference. This is the add/drop function.
Conventional methods used by wavelength division multiplexers in separating an optical signal into its component channels include the use of filters and fiber gratings as separators. A “separator,” as the term is used in this specification, is an integrated collection of optical components functioning as a unit which separates one or more channels from an optical signal. Filters allow a target channel to pass through while redirecting all other channels. Fiber gratings target a channel to be reflected while all other channels pass through. Both filters and fiber gratings are well known in the art and will not be discussed in further detail here.
A problem with the conventional separators is the precision required of a device for transmitting a signal into an optic fiber. A signal entering a wavelength division multiplexer must conform to a set of very narrow pass bands.
FIG. 3
shows a sample spectrum curve
310
comprised of numerous channels as it enters a dense wavelength division multiplexer. The pass bands
320
of the channels are very narrow. Ideally, the curve would be a square wave. A narrow pass band is problematic because, due to the physical limitations and temperature sensitivity of signal source laser devices, they never emit light exactly at the center wavelength of an optical filter. The difference between the actual wavelength and the wavelength at the center of the pass band is called the “offset.” The amount of offset or change in offset (“drift”) ideally should not be larger than the width of the pass bands. Otherwise, crosstalk between channels will be too large. Crosstalk occurs when one channel or part of a channel appears as noise on another channel adjacent to it. Since the signals resulting from the conventional wavelength division multiplexer configurations have narrow pass bands, the signal source devices (“transmitter”), such as lasers or the like, must be of a high precision so that offset or drift is limited to the width of the pass bands. This high precision is difficult to accomplish. Signal transmitting devices of high precision are available but are very expensive. Also, the signal transmitting devices must be aligned individually for each separator, which is time intensive.
Therefore, there exists a need for a separation mechanism which would allow a wavelength division multiplexer to have a greater tolerance for wavelength offset and drift and a greater ease of alignment than is realized by conventional separators. The present invention addresses such a need.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a dense wavelength division multiplexer for separating an optical signal into optical channels. The dense wavelength division multiplexer includes at least one birefringent plate for separating one or more of the plurality of optical channels, where the separating mechanism is at least partially based on the polarity of the plurality of optical channels, and a nonlinear interferometer optically coupled to the at least one birefringent plate for introducing a phase difference between at least two of the plurality of optical channels. In a preferred embodiment, the mechanism of separating includes birefringent beam separation and recombination plates, optical rotation elements, a lens and a non-linear interferometer. The present invention provides an ease in alignment and a higher tolerance to drifts due to the increase in the widths of the pass bands and also provides an improved efficiency of separation of channels. It may also be easily modified to perform the add/drop function as it separates channels. The materials required to manufacture and implement the dense wavelength division multiplexer in accordance with the present invention are readily available. The present invention thus does not require special or expensive materials or processes. It is thus cost effective.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5033830 (1991-07-01), Jameson
patent: 5212586 (1993-05-01), Van Delde
Avanex Corporation
Sawyer Law Group LLP
Shafer Ricky D.
LandOfFree
High-isolation dense wavelength division multiplexer... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with High-isolation dense wavelength division multiplexer..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High-isolation dense wavelength division multiplexer... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2614010