Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical energy applicator
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-04
2003-04-08
Schaetzle, Kennedy (Department: 3762)
Surgery: light, thermal, and electrical application
Light, thermal, and electrical application
Electrical energy applicator
C607S121000, C607S122000, C600S373000, C600S374000, C600S395000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06546292
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to implantable electrodes and more particularly to a cardiac pacing lead distal tip electrode.
2. Description of Related Art
Pacemaker leads are used to electrically connect a cardiac pacemaker pulse generator to heart tissue to be stimulated. For example, endocardial type leads which are inserted into a vein and then guided into the desired heart cavity include at their distal end an electrode tip designed to contact the endocardium or the tissue forming the inner lining of the heart. These leads, connected to a pacemaker, are commonly used for both sensing electrical signals produced by the heart and providing pacing stimulation.
The electrical pacing signal that is delivered to the cardiac muscle must be of sufficient magnitude to depolarize the excitable cells that are adjacent to the electrode tip. The electrode size and shape, tissue conductivity, and the distance separating the electrode tip from the excitable cells are factors in determining the stimulus threshold. Many of these factors are highly determined by the geometry and material composition of the electrode.
The duration or battery life of a pacemaker is, in part, dependent on the current drain that is used in stimulating the cardiac muscle. This current drain is determined by the programmed voltage, pulse width, the rate of the pacemaker stimulator and the pacing impedance presented to the pulse generator. It is important to note that improvements in pacemaker longevity due to increased pacing impedance are not dependent upon reprogramming the pacemaker in any manner.
The pacing impedance is a function of the macroscopic surface area of the electrode. As it is optimal to have a high pacing impedance, most modern pacing electrode designs strive for a reduced area stimulus electrode. Thus, small diameter electrodes will reduce the stimulus current necessary to pace the heart and will extend the life of the pacemaker. Electrodes having very small tip surface areas, in some designs, are problematic in that the small surface area or sharp point can increase the chance of the electrode perforating the ventricular wall, which can lead to blood loss into the pericardial sack. In addition, small tip electrodes are also very sensitive to implantation angle and can demonstrate marked stimulus threshold variability during occurrences of lead micro-dislodgement due to the very uneven surface structure of the endocardial wall. At times the sensitivity to stimulus threshold with micro-dislodgment can cause exit block or complete loss of cardiac stimulation.
It should also be noted that electrodes having very small stimulus areas are prone to generate large polarization artifact signals. These voltage signal distortions are inefficient in that they take energy away from stimulation of the cardiac tissue. More importantly, these artifact signals can present problems to the pacemaker in sensing the following heart activity. One method to reduce this artifact is to increase the microscopic surface area of the electrode, while keeping the macroscopic surface area fixed. This microscopic surface area is the sum of all the microscopic cracks, crevices and indentations on the surface of the electrode.
The electrode must also provide a means for sensing the electrical activity or signal of the heart. The ability to efficiently detect heart activity is directly related to the sensing impedance of the electrode. Optimal sensing occurs with low sensing source impedance electrode designs. Thus large macroscopic surface area electrodes are desired for sensing.
The pacing, or stimulating, threshold is a measurement of the energy required for a voltage pulse to initiate a contraction in the heart tissue. The stimulus threshold typically rises after implantation of an electrode since there is an increase in the spacing between the electrode tip and the excitable cardiac tissue. This is a typical foreign body tissue healing response to the electrode tip and this healing response includes the generation of a fibrous capsule around the electrode tip. Lower stimulus thresholds have resulted from electrode designs with a porous structure at the distal electrode end. Optimal porous structures appear to minimize the initial foreign body reaction and hasten the subsequent healing response to the pacemaker lead tip electrode.
Thus, a considerable design challenge in current state-of-the-art electrodes is the optimization of the electrode surface area, geometry and porosity. High pacing impedance is optimally achieved by low macroscopic surface area electrode geometry. Low polarization losses are optimally achieved by a high microscopic surface area electrode geometry. Low sensing source impedance requires large macroscopic surface area electrode geometry. Low sensitivity to micro-dislodgement requires large macroscopic surface area electrode geometry. The design outcome is always a compromise between the opposite desired extremes. Recent devices utilize various types of surface coatings or metal surface enhancements (e.g., iridium oxide). These surface changes increase the microscopic surface area while keeping the electrode macroscopic surface area relatively the same. These surface enhancements help reduce the polarization losses for a given tip geometry but do not fully solve the design tradeoff concerns on the electrode surface.
An electrode tip design, taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,476,116 by Parsonnet et al., utilizes an electrode tip with a fluid filled cavity. Within this cavity is a high surface area electrode. The fluid filled cavity is isolated from the tissue to be stimulated by an electrically insulating material containing a small aperture. This electrode tip design has, in effect, a large electrode surface area which lowers the polarization losses. The tissue to be stimulated however perceives a very small surface area due to the small aperture, resulting in high tip to tissue impedance. This design performed reasonably well short term, however the long term or chronic performance was shown to be compromised. The small aperture of the Parsonnet design was highly sensitive to lead movement due to micro-dislodgment which changed the interface between the tissue and the small aperture. This aperture dislodgment caused high stimulation voltage thresholds in some patients and in extreme cases caused total electrode exit block which is a complete failure to stimulate.
A modified Parsonnet design was disclosed by F. Hoffmann in an article entitled “Stimulating Electrode With Low Energy Consumption” (
Medical and Biological Engineering,
September 1973, Pg. 659-660). This proposed design added additional holes or apertures to the original Parsonnet design. The sensitivity of the tip to tissue interface was effectively reduced, however consistent and stable chronic pacing thresholds were still not obtained.
A similar electrode tip design is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,844 to Stokes et al. To achieve low polarization losses, Stokes et al. teach the use of a fluid filled cavity containing an electrode with a large surface area, similar to that of Parsonnet et al. Low stimulation voltage thresholds are achieved by the use of a cavity sheath with a small aperture, again similar to the Parsonnet design. To overcome the chronic increase in stimulation voltage, the Stokes design incorporates a steroid eluting device contained within the bodily fluid filled cavity. The steroid elution alters the results of the reaction to the foreign body response at the electrode tip to tissue interface and results in low chronic stimulation voltage thresholds.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,011,861, Enger teaches the use of an electric terminal, with a porous outer sheath. The porous sheath encourages the ingress of blood vessels without the production of a fibrous tissue interface which would result in high stimulation voltages. The large number of pores result in a large number of sites of current loss with no areas of high current density nor a marked increase in stimulus pacing impedance.
MacGregor te
Krall Robert C.
Smith Louis J.
Steinhaus Bruce M.
Wiley William H.
Gore Enterprise Holdings Inc.
House Wayne
Schaetzle Kennedy
LandOfFree
High impedance, low polarization cardiac electrode does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with High impedance, low polarization cardiac electrode, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and High impedance, low polarization cardiac electrode will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3015710