Plant protecting and regulating compositions – Plant growth regulating compositions – Plural active ingredients
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-06
2004-08-10
Clardy, S. Mark (Department: 1616)
Plant protecting and regulating compositions
Plant growth regulating compositions
Plural active ingredients
C504S128000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06774085
ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to the field of the crop protection products which can be employed against harmful plants in tolerant or resistant crops of sugar beet and which comprise a combination of two or more herbicides as herbicidally active ingredients.
The introduction of tolerant or resistant sugar beet varieties and lines, in particular transgenic sugar beet varieties and lines, leads to the conventional weed control system being complemented by novel active ingredients which are nonselective per se in conventional sugar beet varieties. The active ingredients are, for example, the known broad-spectrum herbicides such as glyphosate, sulfosate, glufosinate, bialophos and imidazolinone herbicides [herbicides (A)], which can now be employed in the tolerant crops developed for each of them. The efficacy level of these herbicides against harmful plants in tolerant crops is high, but, similarly as in the case of other herbicide treatments, depends on the nature of the herbicide employed, the application rate, the formulation in question, the harmful plants to be controlled in each case, the climatic and soil conditions and the like. Furthermore, the herbicides exhibit weaknesses (gaps) with regard to specific harmful plant species. Another criterion is the duration of action or the rate of degradation of the herbicide. Other factors which must be taken into account, if appropriate, are changes in the sensitivity of harmful plants, which may occur localized or upon prolonged use of the herbicides. Losses of action in individual plants can only be compensated for to some extent by increasing the application rates of the herbicides, if at all. Furthermore, there is always a need for methods for achieving the herbicidal action with a lower application rate of active ingredients. Not only does a lower application rate reduce the active ingredient quantity required for application, but, as a rule, it also reduces the quantity of formulation auxiliaries required. Both reduce the economic input and improve the ecological tolerance of the herbicide treatment.
A possibility of improving the use profile of a herbicide can be the combination of the active ingredient with one or more other active ingredients, which contribute the desired additional properties. However, phenomena of physical and biological incompatibility, for example lacking stability of a coformulation, decomposition of an active ingredient or antagonism of the active ingredients, occur not infrequently when using several active ingredients in combination. In contrast, what is desired is combinations of active ingredients with a favorable activity profile, high stability and the greatest degree of synergistically increased action, which allows reduction of the application rate compared with the individual application of the active ingredients to be combined.
Surprisingly, it has now been found that active ingredients from the group of the abovementioned broad-spectrum herbicide (A) in combination with other herbicides from group (A) and, if appropriate, certain herbicides (B) act synergistically in an especially advantageous manner when they are employed in the sugar beet crops which are suitable for the selective use of the first-mentioned herbicides.
Subject-matter of the invention is thus the use of herbicide combinations for controlling harmful plants in sugar beet crops, wherein the herbicide combination in question comprises a synergistically effective content of
(A) a broad-spectrum herbicide from the group of the compounds consisting of
(A1) compounds of the formula (A1)
in which Z is a radical of the formula —OH or a peptide residue of the formula —NHCH(CH
3
)CONHCH(CH
3
)COOH or —NHCH(CH
3
)CONHCH[CH
2
CH(CH
3
)
2
]COOH, and its esters and salts, preferably glufosinate and its salts with acids and bases, in particular glufosinate-ammonium, L-glufosinate and its salts, bialaphos and its salts with acids and bases and other phosphinothricin derivatives,
(A2) compounds of the formula (A2) and their esters and salts,
preferably glyphosate and its alkali metal salts and salts with amines, in particular glyphosate-isopropylammonium, and sulfosate,
(A3) imidazolinones, preferably imazethapyr, imazapyr, imazamethabenz, imazamethabenzmethyl, imazaquin, imazamox, imazapic (AC 263,222) and their salts, and
(B) one or more herbicides from the group of the compounds consisting of
(B0) one or more structurally different herbicides from the abovementioned group (A) and/or
(B1) foliar- and predominantly soil-acting herbicides which are active against monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous harmful plants, preferably from the group consisting of
(B1.1) ethofumesate,
(B1.2) chloridazon,
(B1.3) triflursulfuron and its esters, such as the methyl ester, and
(B1.4) metamitron (PM, pp. 799-801), i.e. 4-amino-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-6-phenyl-1,2,4-triazin-5-one, and/or
(B2) herbicides which are active predominantly against dicotyledonous harmful plants, for example the compounds
(B2.1) desmedipham,
(B2.2) phenmedipham,
(B2.3) quinmerac and
(B2.4) clopyralid and their salts, and/or
(B3) herbicides which are predominantly foliar-acting and which can be employed against monocotyledonous harmful plants, for example the compounds
(B3.1) quizalofop-P and its esters, if appropriate also in the form of the racemic mixture quizalofop and its esters, preferably quizalofop-P-ethyl or quizalofop-P-tefuryl,
(B3.2) fenoxaprop-P and its esters, such as the ethyl ester, if appropriate also in the form of the racemic mixture fenoxaprop and its esters, preferably fenoxaprop-P-ethyl,
(B3.3) fluazifop-P and its esters such as the butyl ester, if appropriate also in the form of the racemic mixture fluazifop and its esters, preferably fluazifop-P-butyl,
(B3.4) haloxyfop and haloxyfop-P and their esters, such as the methyl or the etotyl ester,
(B3.5) clodinafop and its esters, in particular the propargyl ester,
(B3.6) propaquizafop and
(B3.7) cyhalofop and its salts and esters, and/or
(B4) herbicides which are both foliar- and soil-acting and which can be employed against monocotyledonous harmful plants, for example
(B4.1) sethoxydim,
(B4.2) cycloxydim and
(B4.3) clethodim,
and the sugar beet crops tolerate the herbicides (A) and (B) which are present in the combination, if appropriate in the presence of safeners.
The compounds are referred to by their common names and they are known from the “Pesticide Manual” 11
th
Ed., British Crop Protection Council 1997 (hereinbelow also abbreviated to “PM”). In addition to the herbicide combinations according to the invention, further crop protection active ingredients and formulation aids and auxiliaries conventionally used in crop protection may be used.
The synergistic effects are observed when the active ingredients (A) and (B) are applied jointly, but can also be observed upon split application (splitting). It is also possible to apply the herbicides or the herbicide combinations in several portions (sequential application), for example after pre-emergence uses, followed by post-emergence applications or after early post-emergence applications, followed by applications at the medium to late post-emergence stage. The simultaneous use of the active ingredients of the combination in question, if appropriate in several portions, is preferred. However, the split application of the individual active ingredients of a combination is also possible and may be advantageous in individual cases. Other crop protection agents such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides and the like, and/or various auxiliaries, adjuvants, and/or fertilizer applications can also be integrated into the use of this system.
The synergistic effects permit reduction of the application rates of the individual active ingredients, a more potent action against the same harmful plant species with the same application rate, the control of species to which the action has previously not extended (gaps), a widened application period and/or a reduced number of the individual applications required, and, as a result for the user, economical
Bieringer Hermann
Hacker Erwin
Stuebler Hermann
Willms Lothar
Aventis CropScience GmbH
Clardy S. Mark
Frommer & Lawrence & Haug LLP
LandOfFree
Herbicides for tolerant or resistant sugar beet cultures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Herbicides for tolerant or resistant sugar beet cultures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Herbicides for tolerant or resistant sugar beet cultures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3343366