Herbicide-tolerant plants and methods of controlling the...

Plant husbandry – Process

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C800S300000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06308458

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to DNA molecules encoding herbicide-tolerant forms of the enzyme protoporphyrinogen oxidase (“protox”). The invention further relates to herbicide-tolerant plants as well as methods for tissue culture selection and herbicide application based on these herbicide-tolerant forms of protox.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
I. The Protox Enzyme and its Involvement in the Chlorophyll/Heme Biosynthetic Pathway
The biosynthetic pathways that lead to the production of chlorophyll and heme share a number of common steps. Chlorophyll is a light harvesting pigment present in all green photosynthetic organisms. Heme is a cofactor of hemoglobin, cytochromes, P450 mixed-function oxygenases, peroxidases, and catalyses (see, e.g. Lehninger,
Biochemistry
, Worth Publishers, New York (1975)), and is therefore a necessary component for all aerobic organisms.
The last common step in chlorophyll and heme biosynthesis is the oxidation of protoporphyrinogen IX to protoporphyrin IX. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase (referred to herein as “protox”) is the enzyme that catalyzes this last oxidation step (Matringe et al.,
Biochem. J
. 260: 231 (1989)).
The protox enzyme has been purified either partially or completely from a number of organisms including the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(Labbe-Bois and Labbe, In
Biosynthesis of Heme and Chlorophyll
, E. H. Dailey, ed. McGraw Hill: New York, pp. 235-285 (1990)), barley etioplasts (Jacobs and Jacobs,
Biochem. J
. 244: 219 (1987)), and mouse liver (Dailey and Karr,
Biochem
. 26: 2697 (1987)). Genes encoding protox have been isolated from two prokaryotic organisms,
Escherichia coli
(Sasarman et al.,
Can. J. Microbiol
. 39: 1155 (1993)) and
Bacillus subtilis
(Dailey et al.,
J. Biol. Chem
. 269: 813 (1994)). These genes share no sequence similarity; neither do their predicted protein products share any amino acid sequence identity. The
E. coli
protein is approximately 21 kDa, and associates with the cell membrane. The
B. subtilis
protein is 51 kDa, and is a soluble, cytoplasmic activity.
Protox encoding genes have now also been isolated from humans (see Nishimura et al.,
J. Biol. Chem
. 270(14): 8076-8080 (1995) and plants (International application no. PCT/IB95/00452 filed Jun. 8, 1995, published Dec. 21, 1995 as WO 95/34659).
II. The Protox Gene as a Herbicide Target
The use of herbicides to control undesirable vegetation such as weeds or plants in crops has become an almost universal practice. The relevant market exceeds a billion dollars annually. Despite this extensive use, weed control remains a significant and costly problem for farmers.
Effective use of herbicides requires sound management. For instance, time and method of application and stage of weed plant development are critical to getting good weed control with herbicides. Since various weed species are resistant to herbicides, the production of effective herbicides becomes increasingly important. Novel herbicides can now be discovered using high-throughput screens that implement recombinant DNA technology. Metabolic enzymes essential to plant growth and development can be recombinantly produced though standard molecular biological techniques and utilized as herbicide targets in screens for novel inhibitors of the enzymes' activity. The novel inhibitors discovered through such screens may then be used as herbicides to control undesirable vegetation.
Unfortunately, herbicides that exhibit greater potency, broader weed spectrum and more rapid degradation in soil can also have greater crop phytotoxicity. One solution applied to this problem has been to develop crops that are resistant or tolerant to herbicides. Crop hybrids or varieties resistant to the herbicides allow for the use of the herbicides without attendant risk of damage to the crop. Development of resistance can allow application of a herbicide to a crop where its use was previously precluded or limited (e.g. to pre-emergence use) due to sensitivity of the crop to the herbicide. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,761,373, incorporated herein by reference, is directed to plants resistant to various imidazolinone or sulfonamide herbicides. The resistance is conferred by an altered acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) enzyme. U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,374, incorporated herein by reference, relates to plant cells and plants containing a gene encoding a mutant glutamine synthetase (GS) resistant to inhibition by herbicides that were known to inhibit GS, e.g. phosphinothricin and methionine sulfoximine. U.S. Pat. No. 5,013,659, incorporated herein by reference, is directed to plants that express a mutant acetolactate synthase (ALS) that renders the plants resistant to inhibition by sulfonylurea herbicides. U.S. Pat. No. 5,162,602, incorporated herein by reference, discloses plants tolerant to inhibition by cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropanoic acid herbicides. The tolerance is conferred by an altered acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase(ACCase). U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,798, incorporated herein by reference, discloses transgenic glyphosate resistant maize plants, which tolerance is conferred by an altered 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate (EPSP) synthase gene.
The protox enzyme serves as the target for a variety of herbicidal compounds. The herbicides that inhibit protox include many different structural classes of molecules (Duke et al.,
Weed Sci
. 39: 465 (1991); Nandihalli et al.,
Pesticide Biochem. Physiol
. 43: 193 (1992); Matringe et al.,
FEBS Lett
. 245: 35 (1989); Yanase and Andoh,
Pesticide Biochem. Physiol
. 35: 70 (1989)). These herbicidal compounds include the diphenylethers {e.g. acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobezoic acid; its methyl ester; or oxyfluorfen, 2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluorobenzene)}, oxidiazoles, (e.g. oxidiazon, 3-[2,4-dichloro-5-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl]-5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-(3H)-one), cyclic imides (e.g. S-23142,N-(4-chloro-2-fluoro-5-propargyloxyphenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalimide; chlorophthalim, N-(4-chlorophenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrahydrophthalimide), phenyl pyrazoles (e.g. TNPP-ethyl, ethyl 2-[1-(2,3,4-trichlorophenyl)-4-nitropyrazolyl-5-oxy]propionate; M&B 39279), pyridine derivatives (e.g. LS 82-556), and phenopylate and its O-phenylpyrrolidino- and piperidinocarbamate analogs. Many of these compounds competitively inhibit the normal reaction catalyzed by the enzyme, apparently acting as substrate analogs.
Typically, the inhibitory effect on protox is determined by measuring fluorescence at about 622 to 635 nm, after excitation at about 395 to 410 nM (see, e.g. Jacobs and Jacobs,
Enzyme
28: 206 (1982); Sherman et al.,
Plant Physiol
. 97: 280 (1991)). This assay is based on the fact that protoporphyrin IX is a fluorescent pigment, and protoporphyrinogen IX is nonfluorescent.
The predicted mode of action of protox-inhibiting herbicides involves the accumulation of protoporphyrinogen IX in the chloroplast. This accumulation is thought to lead to leakage of protoporphyrinogen IX into the cytosol where it is oxidized by a peroxidase activity to protoporphyrin IX. When exposed to light, protoporphyrin IX can cause formation of singlet oxygen in the cytosol. This singlet oxygen can in turn lead to the formation of other reactive oxygen species, which can cause lipid peroxidation and membrane disruption leading to rapid cell death (Lee et al.,
Plant Physiol
. 102: 881 (1993)).
Not all protox enzymes are sensitive to herbicides that inhibit plant protox enzymes. Both of the protox enzymes encoded by genes isolated from
Escherichia coli
(Sasarman et al.,
Can. J. Microbiol
. 39: 1155 (1993)) and
Bacillus subtilis
(Dailey et al.,
J. Biol. Chem
. 269: 813 (1994)) are resistant to these herbicidal inhibitors. In addition, mutants of the unicellular alga
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
resistant to the phenylimide herbicide S-23142 have been reported (Kataoka et al.,
J. Pesticide Sci
. 15: 449 (1990); Shibata et al., In
Research in Photosynthesis
, Vol. III, N. Murata,

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Herbicide-tolerant plants and methods of controlling the... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Herbicide-tolerant plants and methods of controlling the..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Herbicide-tolerant plants and methods of controlling the... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2603799

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.