Hepatitis A virus culture process

Details Hepatitis A virus culture process Hepatitis A virus culture process

1996-04-17

2001-02-27

Allen, Marianne P. (Department: 1631)

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology

Animal cell, per se ; composition thereof; process of...

Solid support and method of culturing cells on said solid...

C435S091500, C435S235100, C435S239000, C435S383000, C435S394000, C435S455000, C435S456000, C424S226100

Reexamination Certificate

active

06194210

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
i. Field of the Invention
The field of this invention is a process for the production of viruses in microcarrier cell culture. Perfused MRC-5 cells cultured on glass-coated microcarriers and infected with hepatitis A virus exemplifies the process.
ii. Background
Many viruses and therapeutic proteins are produced by anchorage dependent cells where cell attachment to a surface is a prerequisite for cell growth and proper function of the cell line. When relatively small quantities are required, multiple T-flasks and Roller bottles have been traditionally used to supply the required surface area. Other commercially available systems such as NUNC CELL FACTORIES cell culture system and COSTAR CUBES cell culture system have substantially increased surface area and thus increased productivity per bioreactor unit. However, these systems still require multiple bioreactor units for large quantities and are therefore limited in scale-up potential for commercial production.
Various packed bed systems have also been developed, including hollow fiber reactors, packed beds of spheres, packed beds of randomly oriented fibers, and porous ceramic monoliths. These systems have documented difficulties with maintaining nutrient supply to the cells in the reactor due to the reactor configuration and restrictions of nutrient transport paths due to cell growth. Hollow fiber reactors rely on diffusion and Starling flow to supply medium flow across the cell compartment [see J. M. Piret (1989), B.c.D Thesis, Dept. of Chem. Eng., Mass. Inst. Technology, August 1989]. Diffusive nutrient penetration is only adequate if the depth of the cell accumulation on the fibers is controllable and uniform, which it is not in these reactors. Starling flow decreases as cell growth occurs, due to increased flow resistance offered by the cell growth. This reduces mixing within the cell growth chamber. Randomly packed beds of beads or fibers rely on forced convection, and are both prone to channeling through paths of least hydraulic resistance, bypassing the areas where surface area is most dense, and hence likely to contain cells. Porous ceramic monoliths are better in this respect, but these suffer from the second factor, biofouling. As the cells grow on the attachment surface, they can constrict and occlude the paths where medium flow occurs [J. E. Putnam et al., Ann. Mtg. Soc. Ind. Microbiol., Orlando, Fla., Aug. 1, 1990]. In the case of the ceramic monolith, cell growth results in restriction of the channel, such that increased hydraulic resistance to flow is offered. The medium then preferentially flows to other parallel channels, and the result is that the channel with the heaviest cell growth receives the least medium. Due to these heterogeneities in the cellular microenvironment and limited scale-up potential, these reactors have had limited success; no U.S. licensed human vaccines or therapeutics are known to be produced in these systems.
The use of solid static mixer elements in cell and virus culture is known, see Grabner and Paul, U.S. Pat. No. 4,296,204. The use of a mesh for culturing primary tissues comprised of several cell types is found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,489 and 5,160,490. The tissue resulting from a mesh culture of stromal fibroblasts is claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,489. Using motionless mixing elements as the surface for cell growth provides uniform nutrient transport to the cell population. The scale-up, cleaning, and sterilization issues remain a challenge for commercial application of these bioreactor systems. In addition, the biomass in these systems cannot be directly monitored during the cultivation. Therefore, indirect measures of cell mass must be used to characterize the performance of the bioreactor. Due to the same reasons, removal of a cell associated product can also be problematic with these reactor configurations.
Microcarrier technology provides a large amount of surface area for cell growth on small, spherical beads (90 to 250 microns in diameter) which are suspended in a stirred tank bioreactor. High surface to volume ratios can be achieved resulting in a highly efficient production system on a bioreactor volume basis. The technology provides a homogeneous cell culture environment with the capability to quantify cell mass and harvest cell associated product during the cultivation. Since the bioreactor is a stirred tank, well established cleaning and sterilization procedures, as well as overall tank design is readily available from the fermentation industry for commercial applications. The commercial manufacture of Polio Vaccine using microcarriers at the 1000-1500 liter scale illustrates the scale-up potential of this approach. The commercial production of a Rabies vaccine and a Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine using microcarrier culture further illustrates the proven scale-up potential of this method.
Although many cell lines and viruses have been propagated on microcarriers, many challenges remain in implementation of this technology at commercial scale. Attaining a low shear environment throughout the cultivation and maintaining a viable culture for sustained product formation through extended cultivation periods can be difficult. Selection of the proper microcarrier and culture conditions is often critical in producing the desired product. The propagation of Hepatitis A is a good example of these challenges. Junker, B. et al., (“Evaluation of a Microcarrier Process for Large Scale Cultivation of Attentuated Hepatitis A,” Cytotechnology, Vol. 9, 1-3, 1992) described the evaluation of CYTODEX 3 collagen-coated Sephadex Microcarriers microcarriers as the substratum of MRC-5 cells growth and subsequent infection by hepatitis A virus. A major contributor to the low hepatitis A titers from the microcarrier cultures was attributed to the fact that the cells gradually fell off the beads during the infection period. Based on these results, microcarrier technology was reported to be suboptimal for commercial scale production of hepatitis A virus. Because culture of hepatitis A virus in exemplified in the instant patent disclosure, a brief review of the methods used to culture this virus is in order.
In 1973, Feinstone et al., [Science 182, p 1026] identified the etiologic agent of infectious hepatitis, later known as hepatitis A virus, (HAV), using immune electron microscopy. In vitro culture of hepatitis A virus (HAV) was reported by Provost et al [P.S.E.B.M 160, p 213, 1979] according to a process whereby liver from HAV infected marmosets was used as an inoculurn for liver explant culture and fetal rhesus kidney (FRhK6) cell culture [U.S. Pat. No. 4,164,566]. In a later invention, direct inoculation of a HAV, which had not been previously passaged through a subhuman primate, was successfully used to initiate in vitro propagation of HAV [Provost et al., P.S.E.B.M. 167, p 201 (1981); U.S. Pat. No. 5,021,349].
From this work, attenuation of HAV through in vitro culture was demonstrated. In addition, it was demonstrated that upon repeated passage in vitro, HAV cultures became more productive and replication rate accelerated as the virus became adapted to the cultured cells. A further development was the demonstration of protective efficacy of both the live attenuated virus [Provost; et. al., J. Med. Viol. 20, p 165 (1986)] and the formalin inactivated HAV [U.S. Pat. No. 4,164,566; U.S. Pat. No. 5,021,348; Provost et. al., in
Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease,
p 83-86, 1988—Alan R. Liss, Inc.]. From the foregoing work, it has become clear that either an inactivated or attenuated, immunogenic HAV are possible vaccine candidates. However, a reproducible, commercial scale process for production of high purity antigen is needed if a safe HAV vaccine is to be commercially available for use in humans.
Various methods have been described to culture HAV for vaccine production. Thus, Provost et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,021,348) described a process whereby, in a preferred method, a cell cultur

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Hepatitis A virus culture process does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Hepatitis A virus culture process, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Hepatitis A virus culture process will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2569327