Optical: systems and elements – Single channel simultaneously to or from plural channels – By partial reflection at beam splitting or combining surface
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-11
2003-02-18
Schwartz, Jordan M. (Department: 2873)
Optical: systems and elements
Single channel simultaneously to or from plural channels
By partial reflection at beam splitting or combining surface
C359S631000, C359S630000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06522474
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention generally relates to head-mounted display systems for viewing electronically generated stereoscopic images and more particularly relates to an apparatus and method for an arrangement of optical components to provide a head-mounted optical apparatus that provides a very wide field of view and large exit pupils.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The potential value of stereoscopic display systems is widely appreciated particularly in entertainment and simulation fields. An overall goal is to provide the most realistic display possible, within the constraints of a particular application. Realistic stereoscopic display is characterized by a number of quantifiable features, including wide field of view (horizontal and vertical), sharp image resolution, and sufficient brightness.
One alternative for stereoscopic imaging is provided by head-mounted displays (HMDs). Goggles, glasses, and similar eyewear have been used in a number of ways to provide compact, lightweight, and inexpensive head-mounted display apparatus for providing stereoscopic effects. Solutions using eyewear range from using lenses having different polarization filters for each eye, as is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,034,717 (Dentinger et al.), to using shutters that alternate between right and left eye visibility as is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,021,846 (Roese). An alternate shutter mechanism is a color shutter, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,903,395 (Rallison et al.) which provides varying color filters at high frequencies. Solutions of this type can be economical, particularly when used to accommodate a large group of observers. However, the requirement for using a separate external display, such as a display screen or CRT, means that such solutions necessarily have a large footprint and are, therefore, not well suited for individual viewing. Thus, it can be seen that there are advantages to an eyewear arrangement in which the displayed stereoscopic image is contained within the head-mounted display itself.
There are numerous HMDs and face-mounted devices (FMDs) commercially available, offering either stereoscopic or non-stereoscopic imaging. One example of an HMD that provides stereoscopic imaging is the Cyber Eye CE 200S from iReality.com, Inc., Half Moon Bay, Calif. Another example is the Datavisor 80™ Wide Field-of-View Head Mounted Display from n-vision, Inc., McLean, Va. An HMD providing non-stereoscopic imaging is the Eye-Treck™, a product of Olympus Optical Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
While HMD devices that are currently available provide suitable imaging for some applications, there is room for improvement. For example, realistic stereoscopic imaging requires a wide field of view. However, existing devices are limited in this regard. The Cyber Eye CD 200S HMD, for example, claims a field of view limited to 22.5 degrees horizontal, 16.8 degrees vertical. The Eye-Treck HMD claims a field of view of less than 40 degrees horizontal, less than 22 degrees vertical. The Datavisor 80 device, while it claims a field of view of 120 degrees horizontal, is relatively large and is too expensive for most applications. The resolution of commercially available devices is also limited. Therefore, while image quality may be acceptable for some applications such as for computer monitor display, the performance level achieved by existing devices is not sufficient for a broader range of virtual reality applications.
Product literature from one HMD manufacturer (iReality.com, Inc. at www.ireality.com/hmds.html) states that sharp resolution and wide field-of-view imaging can be considered “mutually exclusive” for HMD design. Certainly, the difficulty of providing sharp resolution, wide field-of-view imaging in a compact, lightweight HMD is well-appreciated in the optical design arts and conventional solutions have made only modest improvements in obtaining realistic stereoscopic imaging. In the optical design arts, it is well understood that HMD design presents a number of strict constraints, with a number of optical parameters that are fixed and inflexible. Using a conventional approach to this type of optical design problem, the configuration of the Eye-Treck HMD employs a free-shaped, aspheric prism in order to provide an optics path having compact dimensions with minimal aberrations and image distortion. Aspheric design approaches are known to have particular value because they can allow an optical designer considerably more variables to work with than optics using more conventional spherical structures. However, aspheric design can present significant drawbacks relative to cost, design complexity, and overall flexibility of a design solution. For example, modification or scaling of an aspheric design solution may not be possible without considerable redesign. Examples of HMD devices based on aspheric optical components are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,028,709 (Takahashi) which discloses an HMD using a prism having rotationally asymmetric surfaces; U.S. Pat. No. 6,097,354 (Takahashi et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,765 (Togino) which discloses use of an aspherical mirror; U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,780 (Togino et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,596,433 (Konuma) which discloses use of a beamsplitter having an aspherical surface as HMD component.
Spherical optics, on the other hand, present other problems to the HMD designer. Most notably, the image to be presented to an observer is conventionally provided on a flat surface. Spherical optics can require considerable design in order to compensate for image aberration and distortion that results from attempting to project a flat image using substantially spherical lenses. This difficulty is seen, for example, in the design disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,903,395 (Rallison et al.) noted above, which discloses conventional lens design approaches to project an image from a flat surface. At the same time, however, it can be appreciated that there are advantages to the use of spherical optics, particularly with respect to availability, manufacturability, and cost. Additional potential advantages over aspherical approaches include scalability and flexibility of design when using spherical optics.
One example of an HMD design utilizing spherical optics is the pilot's helmet disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,854,688 (Hayford et al.), directed to the transmission of a non-stereoscopic, two-dimensional image along a non-linear path, such as attached to headgear for a pilot. In the optical arrangement of the Hayford et al. patent, a ball lens, employed as a folding component and lens for providing a relatively wide field of view, directs a collimated output image, optically at infinity, for viewing by a pilot. This allows a pilot to view information projected from a small CRT screen without requiring change of gaze direction or refocusing. While the ball lens may provide some advantages for inherently wide field of view in the device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,854,688, there are a number of drawbacks to a design of this type. The tilted and decentered optics path of the disclosed device in U.S. Pat. No. 4,854,688 inherently introduces image aberrations that require a considerable amount of correction. To compensate for off-axis imaging from a reflective or partially reflective collimator, a complex and costly relay lens assembly, tilted and decentered with respect to the optical path, are required. Relay optics of the type disclosed in the Hayford et al. patent, needed for such a compact arrangement, not only add cost, but also increase the bulk and weight of a head-mounted viewing device.
Imaging by forming a large pupil has particular advantages when providing an HMD solution with a wide field of view. However, with conventional lens design approaches, forming a large pupil inherently causes other problems, since the lens design must attempt to correct for the pupil as well as for the wide field. The lens system must not only be able to correct for on-axis aberrations (chiefly spherical aberration and axial chromatic aberration), but for off
Agostinelli John A.
Cobb Joshua M.
Kessler David
Blish Nelson Adrian
Eastman Kodak Company
Schwartz Jordan M.
Stultz Jessica
LandOfFree
Head-mounted optical apparatus for stereoscopic display does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Head-mounted optical apparatus for stereoscopic display, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Head-mounted optical apparatus for stereoscopic display will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3166917