Head anti-rotational and sealing system for a gyratory crusher

Solid material comminution or disintegration – Apparatus – Cooperating comminuting surfaces

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

241216, B02C 204

Patent

active

057756074

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved system for preventing free rotation of the head or cone, of a gyratory crusher which also is able to provide sealing.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The system of the present invention is particularly suited for use with a gyratory crusher of the type disclosed in Australian patent specification 618545 (AU-B-19935/88). However, while the system will be described in large part with reference to a crusher of that type, it is to be understood that the system also has application to other types of gyratory crushers.
Australian patent specification 618545 teaches in relation to its gyratory crusher that, in the absence of any resistive force being applied to the head of the crusher during revolution of the same about the central axis, the head may rotate relative to the bowl and to a shaft by which gyratory motion is imparted to the head. It is further stated that when frangible or friable material is deposited into the crushing chamber defined by the bowl, and is received within the confines of the annular nip between the bowl and head, the material will tend to resist rotation of the head relative to the bowl.
When there is no frangible or friable material present in the crushing chamber, the heads of most gyratory crushers rotate relative to the bowl if they are not restrained. The heads of crushers which are mounted on and supported by commercial ball and roller bearings often rotate at virtually the same speed as the drive shaft gyrates. Such rotation is undesirable, since: of the crusher is called the closed side setting (CSS) and this determines the size of the resultant product (crushed material). The CSS is adjusted whenever necessary to maintain the size of the product within the desired limits. It is usual for the CSS to be audited by measurement periodically and in many crusher installations this is most conveniently done by lowering a soft deformable material such as lead, on a suspension wire, into the crushing chamber whilst the crusher is operating without feed. After it is crushed, the deformable material is withdrawn, by raising the suspension wire, and its thickness measured to determine the CSS. In other installations the deformable material can be dropped into the crushing chamber and recovered, for measurement, from below the crusher. However, when the head is rotating at approximately the speed of gyration such auditing procedures are impossible. It is far too dangerous to lower a suspended item into the chamber and in any case the rotation distorts the deformable material making accurate CSS measurement impossible. crushing chamber the entry of new feed material is impeded and chamber wear is excessive. Firstly the new material is ejected by the centrifugal force transferred from the head. Secondly the head and bowl suffer premature gouging wear by the new material as the rotational inertia (energy) of the head is absorbed. For these reasons the natural tendency of the head to rotate when the crusher is running with the crushing chamber empty is not acceptable to the industry. A head anti-rotation device is required.
Specific to its type of gyratory crusher, but also of relevance to others, Australian patent 618545 further teaches that, when a gyratory crusher is crushing frangible or friable material, there is often a slight circular inching of a point on the lower periphery of the head with respect to an adjacent point on the circumferential wall of the discharge opening in a clockwise or anti-clockwise direction during nutation (gyration) of the head. The circular inching (rotation) of the head cannot be resisted except by the application of a high restraining force, and it is not appropriate to restrain it because: expensive, bowl by the friable and frangible material, and causing wear channels in the bowl and head which allow oversize product to pass through the crusher and mix with correctly crushed product, such that close control of crushed product grade is impossible. to apply adequate but minimal restraint to

REFERENCES:
patent: 28031 (1860-04-01), Wood
patent: 180620 (1876-08-01), Motte
patent: 997918 (1911-07-01), Jones
patent: 1549555 (1925-08-01), Jorgensen
patent: 2327384 (1943-08-01), Annesley
patent: 2579239 (1951-12-01), Lippmann
patent: 2787424 (1957-04-01), Lippmann
patent: 2787425 (1957-04-01), Gruender
patent: 2901189 (1959-08-01), Conway
patent: 2972448 (1961-02-01), Dorsey
patent: 3080126 (1963-03-01), Kueneman et al.
patent: 3312404 (1967-04-01), Allen
patent: 3565353 (1971-02-01), Adam
patent: 3743193 (1973-07-01), DeDiemar et al.
patent: 3744728 (1973-07-01), Treppish
patent: 3750967 (1973-08-01), DeDiemar et al.
patent: 3771735 (1973-11-01), Decker et al.
patent: 3813047 (1974-05-01), Torrence et al.
patent: 3837585 (1974-09-01), Decker et al.
patent: 3873037 (1975-03-01), Decker et al.
patent: 3957213 (1976-05-01), Stockman et al.
patent: 4027825 (1977-06-01), Coxhill
patent: 4034922 (1977-07-01), Coxhill
patent: 4037800 (1977-07-01), Coxhill
patent: 4084756 (1978-04-01), Coxhill
patent: 4192472 (1980-03-01), Johnson
patent: 4198003 (1980-04-01), Polzin et al.
patent: 4206881 (1980-06-01), Werginz
patent: 4272030 (1981-06-01), Afanasiev et al.
patent: 4316585 (1982-02-01), Guzik
patent: 4339087 (1982-07-01), Pollak
patent: 4351490 (1982-09-01), Johnson
patent: 4391414 (1983-07-01), Reiter
patent: 4410143 (1983-10-01), Polinski
patent: 4478373 (1984-10-01), Gieschen
patent: 4512525 (1985-04-01), Cameron
patent: 4585179 (1986-04-01), Tsuji et al.
patent: 4592517 (1986-06-01), Zarogatsky et al.
patent: 4602746 (1986-07-01), Stockmann et al.
patent: 4615491 (1986-10-01), Batch et al.
patent: 4679741 (1987-07-01), Hansen
patent: 4681269 (1987-07-01), Arawaka
patent: 4787563 (1988-11-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 4844362 (1989-07-01), Revnivtsev et al.
patent: 4892257 (1990-01-01), Stoeckmann et al.
patent: 4895311 (1990-01-01), Arawaka
patent: 4976470 (1990-12-01), Arawaka
patent: 5035368 (1991-07-01), Finley et al.
patent: 5115991 (1992-05-01), Saari
patent: 5152468 (1992-10-01), Virtamo et al.
patent: 5190229 (1993-03-01), Kaiser
patent: 5312053 (1994-05-01), Ganser, IV
patent: 5350125 (1994-09-01), Clark

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Head anti-rotational and sealing system for a gyratory crusher does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Head anti-rotational and sealing system for a gyratory crusher, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Head anti-rotational and sealing system for a gyratory crusher will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1197163

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.