Grouping targets of management policies

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer network managing

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S241000, C709S203000, C709S220000, C709S221000, C709S222000, C709S224000, C709S225000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06587876

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to networks, more particularly, to dynamically assigned Internet Protocol (IP) address networks, and even more particularly to the use of user-based policies in networks.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In a network, a policy-based management system maintains policies or rules that govern the use of or access to a network service. As used herein, a policy is a single rule which defines conditions that when evaluated true trigger actions to allow or deny the service. A number of policies can be combined together to form a policy group. However, a recent evolution in terminology of the art (not universally accepted and not followed herein) uses the term “policy” itself to mean the combination of more than one rule, and the term “rule” to mean a single rule.
Previous methods for implementing policies in such systems have relied upon having fixed network addresses. Modern networks, however, more and more depend upon dynamic assignment of addresses for items attached to the network. In computing environments where network addresses are dynamically assigned to computers as they connect into the network, a user's workstation or laptop computer no longer maintains a static network address, and often it does not maintain a hostname that is recognized by the computing environment. This is especially true when dialing into a corporation's network using remote access mechanisms.
Previous solutions have also depended upon assigning policy implicitly based upon characteristics of a device or logical entity which is configured separately from the policy management tools. Such techniques lack flexibility in assignment of policy and lack centralized distribution to the network services being managed. In addition, previous proposed solutions do not resolve conflict between different functions on a manageable entity between policies with different action or condition types applied with a single rule. In fact, to date organizations that define standards for implementing policy have only loosely defined methods for associating policy with a managed entity.
Thus, there is a need for grouping policy related processes and resources, referred to herein as targets.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
As networks have become more and more complicated, so has the management of those networks. The present patent document discloses novel methods and means for using rules that control interactions of entities in electronic systems, such as networks. A collection of such rules are referred to herein as policies. A network comprises processes and resources that provide services to other processes and resources which, in turn, are also connected to the network. In representative embodiments, the present document discloses techniques for grouping policy related processes and resources, referred to herein as targets.
As indicated, electronic systems, such as networks, that comprise resources or processes can control the interactions of such items by means of rules or policies. These items could be for example processes, functions, abstract objects, or physical electronic devices such as computers, printers, etc. Thus, policy refers to the description of a behavior or action that is desired for the item to which the policy applies. In network systems, policies are typically associated with items that affect the flow of data on that network. In order to affect that network traffic flow, policies are directed toward or targeted at managed or controlled entities. An example of a policy could be “assign priority
5
to traffic from the user whose name is user_one”.
As referred to herein, a target is a process or resource that is being managed using a policy or policies. The managed item itself may be able to recognize and conform to the policy, or may be managed by a proxy which recognizes policy information and converts it to configuration information that the managed entity can recognize and conform to.
Modern network devices are typically managed as a unit, i.e., the various features of the device are all managed together. For example, a router has multiple interfaces, with each interface representing a connection to one or more networks. The router's function is to route traffic between these networks. Further, each interface can have multiple capabilities, each of which can affect the traffic in different ways. These mechanisms can each be configured separately. But, in modern network devices all of these different aspects of a single device are typically managed together, usually presenting a difficult to understand interface to the administrator of the network. As a result, the management of even a single device can become a daunting task. In representative embodiments, the present patent document discloses techniques by which separate aspects of a given device can be managed individually by policies.
An advantage of the representative embodiments as described in the present patent document is that the grouping of targets allows the administrator to easily view and manage the entities, whether logical or physical, that are involved in the delivery of a service which could be for example a database, access to a system, or some other service, together rather than individually.
The policy creator benefits from a single, consistent resolution mechanism for the policy-managed environment. Developers of client programs are relieved of the burden of providing for the name resolution themselves, they rely on the server program to perform this service. Central mapping also ensures that consistent information is used throughout the managed environment. Policies can now work in a dynamic environment with automated updates of the changing information without further intervention by the administrator, and with minimal effort on the part of the policy enforcement implementor. The server program would interact with the user name to network address mapping program to determine when an address is assigned and then notify the Policy Enforcement clients, the client programs, that a change had occurred, and what the new mapping is.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5555346 (1996-09-01), Gross et al.
patent: 5797128 (1998-08-01), Birnbaum
patent: 5812819 (1998-09-01), Rodwin et al.
patent: 5870561 (1999-02-01), Jarvis et al.
patent: 5889953 (1999-03-01), Thebaut et al.
patent: 6014700 (2000-01-01), Bainbridge et al.
patent: 6021438 (2000-02-01), Duvvoori et al.
patent: 6041347 (2000-03-01), Harsham et al.
patent: 6052723 (2000-04-01), Ginn
patent: 6064656 (2000-05-01), Angal et al.
patent: 6104700 (2000-08-01), Haddock et al.
patent: 6105027 (2000-08-01), Schneider et al.
patent: 6158010 (2000-12-01), Moriconi et al.
patent: 6167445 (2000-12-01), Gai et al.
patent: 6233686 (2001-05-01), Zenehelsky et al.
patent: 6237036 (2001-05-01), Ueno et al.
patent: 6255943 (2001-07-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 6289394 (2001-09-01), Kozuka
patent: WO 96/21324 (1996-07-01), None
Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, An Expedited Forward PHB (Jun. 1999), < http://www.ietf.org/>.
Stardust.com, Inc., Introduction to QoS Policies (Jul. 1999), <http://www.stardust.com/policy/whitepapers/qospol.htm/>.
Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, An Architecture for Differentiated Services (Dec. 1998), < http://www.ietf.org/>.
Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Assured Forwarding PHB Group (Jun. 1999), < http://www.ietf.org/>.
Internet Draft, Internetl Engineering Task Force, A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for The Internet (Jul. 1999), <http://www.ietf.org/>.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Grouping targets of management policies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Grouping targets of management policies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Grouping targets of management policies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3106508

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.