Data processing: artificial intelligence – Knowledge processing system – Knowledge representation and reasoning technique
Reexamination Certificate
2000-02-10
2003-12-02
Davis, George B. (Department: 2121)
Data processing: artificial intelligence
Knowledge processing system
Knowledge representation and reasoning technique
C706S045000, C706S046000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06658398
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to education systems and more particularly to a tutorial system that analyzes student inputs to determine appropriate feedback to teach new skills.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
When building a knowledge based system or expert system, at least two disciplines are necessary to properly construct the rules that drive the knowledge base, the discipline of the knowledge engineer and the knowledge of the expert. The domain expert has knowledge of the domain or field of use of the expert system. For example, the domain expert of an expert for instructing students in an automotive manufacturing facility might be a process control engineer while the domain expert for a medical instruction system might be a doctor or a nurse. The knowledge engineer is a person that understands the expert system and utilizes the expert's knowledge to create an application for the system. In many instances, the knowledge engineer and domain expert are separate people who have to collaborate to construct the expert system.
Typically, this collaboration takes the form of the knowledge engineer asking questions of the domain expert and incorporating the answers to these questions into the design of the system. This approach is labor intensive, slow and error prone. The coordination of the two separate disciplines may lead to problems. Although the knowledge engineer can transcribe input from the expert utilizing videotape, audio tape, text and other sources, efforts from people of both disciplines have to be expended. Further, if the knowledge engineer does not ask the right questions or asks the questions in an incorrect way, the information utilized to design the knowledge base could be incorrect. Feedback to the knowledge engineer from the expert system is often not available in prior art system until the construction is completed. With conventional system, there is a time consuming feedback loop that ties together various processes from knowledge acquisition to validation.
Educational systems utilizing an expert system component often suffer from a lack of motivational aspects that result in a user becoming bored or ceasing to complete a training program. Current training programs utilize static, hard-coded feedback with some linear video and graphics used to add visual appeal and illustrate concepts. These systems typically support one “correct” answer and navigation through the system is only supported through a single defined path which results in a two-dimensional generic interaction, with no business model support and a single feedback to the learner of correct or incorrect based on the selected response. Current tutorial systems do not architect real business simulations into the rules to provide a creative learning environment to a user.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a broad aspect of a preferred embodiment of the invention, a goal based learning system utilizes a rule based expert training system to provide a cognitive educational experience. The system provides the user with a simulated environment that presents a business opportunity to understand and solve optimally. Mistakes are noted and remedial educational material presented dynamically to build the necessary skills that a user requires for success in the business endeavor. The system utilizes an artificial intelligence engine driving individualized and dynamic feedback with synchronized video and graphics used to simulate real-world environment and interactions. Multiple “correct” answers are integrated into the learning system to allow individualized learning experiences in which navigation through the system is at a pace controlled by the learner. A robust business model provides support for realistic activities and allows a user to experience real world consequences for their actions and decisions and a tutorial system analyzes student inputs to determine appropriate feedback to teach new skills.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4622013 (1986-11-01), Cerchio
patent: 4874784 (1989-10-01), Clancey
patent: 4891766 (1990-01-01), Derr et al.
patent: 4931950 (1990-06-01), Isle et al.
patent: 4964077 (1990-10-01), Eisen et al.
patent: 4977529 (1990-12-01), Gregg et al.
patent: 5002491 (1991-03-01), Abrahamson et al.
patent: 5170464 (1992-12-01), Hayes et al.
patent: 5189402 (1993-02-01), Naimark et al.
patent: 5208745 (1993-05-01), Quentin et al.
patent: 5208898 (1993-05-01), Funabashi et al.
patent: 5239617 (1993-08-01), Gardner et al.
patent: 5259766 (1993-11-01), Sack et al.
patent: 5267865 (1993-12-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5310349 (1994-05-01), Daniels et al.
patent: 5311422 (1994-05-01), Loftin et al.
patent: 5317688 (1994-05-01), Watson et al.
patent: 5326270 (1994-07-01), Ostby et al.
patent: 5359701 (1994-10-01), Fukui et al.
patent: 5372507 (1994-12-01), Goleh
patent: 5395243 (1995-03-01), Lutbin et al.
patent: 5441415 (1995-08-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5491743 (1996-02-01), Shilo et al.
patent: 5533903 (1996-07-01), Kennedy
patent: 5535422 (1996-07-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5537141 (1996-07-01), Harper et al.
patent: 5539869 (1996-07-01), Spoto et al.
patent: 5566291 (1996-10-01), Boulton et al.
patent: 5576844 (1996-11-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 5577186 (1996-11-01), Mann, II et al.
patent: 5597312 (1997-01-01), Bloom et al.
patent: 5616033 (1997-04-01), Kerwin
patent: 5644686 (1997-07-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5644727 (1997-07-01), Atkins
patent: 5673369 (1997-09-01), Kim
patent: 5690496 (1997-11-01), Kennedy
patent: 5696885 (1997-12-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5701400 (1997-12-01), Amado
patent: 5720007 (1998-02-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5727161 (1998-03-01), Purcell, Jr.
patent: 5727950 (1998-03-01), Cook et al.
patent: 5745652 (1998-04-01), Bigus
patent: 5772446 (1998-06-01), Rosen
patent: 5779486 (1998-07-01), Ho et al.
patent: 5788508 (1998-08-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5791907 (1998-08-01), Ramshaw et al.
patent: 5799151 (1998-08-01), Hoffer
patent: 5799292 (1998-08-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5806056 (1998-09-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5810747 (1998-09-01), Brudny et al.
patent: 5822745 (1998-10-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5823781 (1998-10-01), Hitchcock et al.
patent: 5823788 (1998-10-01), Lemelson et al.
patent: 5835683 (1998-11-01), Corella et al.
patent: 5868575 (1999-02-01), Kuczewski
patent: 5870768 (1999-02-01), Hekmatpour
patent: 5875437 (1999-02-01), Atkins
patent: 5889845 (1999-03-01), Staples et al.
patent: 5893123 (1999-04-01), Tuinenga
patent: 5911581 (1999-06-01), Knight Jeremy et al.
patent: 5974446 (1999-10-01), Sonnenreich et al.
patent: 5987443 (1999-11-01), Nichols et al.
patent: 6003021 (1999-12-01), Zadik et al.
patent: 6015348 (2000-01-01), Lambright et al.
patent: 6016486 (2000-01-01), Nichols
patent: 6018730 (2000-01-01), Nichols et al.
patent: 6018731 (2000-01-01), Bertrand et al.
patent: 6018732 (2000-01-01), Bertrand et al.
patent: 6023691 (2000-02-01), Bertrand et al.
patent: 6023692 (2000-02-01), Nichols
patent: 6026386 (2000-02-01), Lannert et al.
patent: 6029156 (2000-02-01), Lannert et al.
patent: 6029158 (2000-02-01), Bertrand et al.
patent: 6029159 (2000-02-01), Zorba et al.
patent: 6032141 (2000-02-01), O'Connor et al.
patent: 6064998 (2000-05-01), Zabloudil et al.
patent: 6067537 (2000-05-01), O'Connor et al.
patent: 6067538 (2000-05-01), Zorba et al.
patent: 6073127 (2000-06-01), Lannert et al.
patent: 6085184 (2000-07-01), Bertrand et al.
patent: 6101489 (2000-08-01), Lannert et al.
patent: 6125358 (2000-09-01), Hubbell et al.
patent: 6134539 (2000-10-01), O'Connor et al.
patent: 6347943 (2002-02-01), Fields et al.
patent: 0 689 132 (1995-12-01), None
patent: 0 710 942 (1996-05-01), None
patent: 0 798 655 (1997-10-01), None
patent: WO 97/44766 (1997-11-01), None
patent: WO 98/03953 (1998-01-01), None
patent: WO 98/25251 (1998-06-01), None
patent: WO 98/32109 (1998-07-01), None
patent: WO 00/04478 (2000-01-01), None
“Bridging the Virtual and the Physical: The InterSim as a Collaborative Support Interface,” Proc. Of 1997 World Conf. On Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 556-558, Dec. 1997.
“Task-Oriented Learning on the Web”; Innovatio
Bertrand Benoit Patrick
Conant Jonathan Christian
Zorba Alexander
Banner & Witcoff , Ltd.
Davis George B.
Indeliq, Inc.
LandOfFree
Goal based educational system utilizing a remediation object does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Goal based educational system utilizing a remediation object, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Goal based educational system utilizing a remediation object will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3115055