Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Process of mutation – cell fusion – or genetic modification – Introduction of a polynucleotide molecule into or...
Reexamination Certificate
2000-05-04
2002-04-16
Ketter, James (Department: 1632)
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Process of mutation, cell fusion, or genetic modification
Introduction of a polynucleotide molecule into or...
C435S325000, C435S366000, C435S382000, C435S383000, C435S391000, C435S440000, C435S465000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06372501
ABSTRACT:
The present invention relates to an immortalized glucose responsive &bgr;-cell line. Such cell lines are particularly useful in the treatment of type 1 diabetes in humans but insulin control in other mammals is envisaged as well as cross species Production and use.
In type 1 (insulin dependant) diabetes mellitus the principal defect is the destruction of pancreatic &bgr;-cells with the resultant loss of insulin production. The condition is normally controlled by the administration of insulin. However, presently available procedures for insulin delivery do not reinstate the normal regulation of glucose metabolism. In non-diabetic people the secretion of insulin is characterised by a basal secretion which occurs between meals and during the night, and secretion that is stimulated in response to a meal. Commercial preparation of fast-acting (NRI-HI) and slow-acting (ultralente) insulins fail to mimic these natural patterns of secretion in diabetic patients. The fastest acting insulin preparations have a slower onset and more prolonged effect than stimulated insulin secretion, while slow acting insulins produce levels of insulin elevated far above those seen during basal secretion. The net result is that patients on subcutaneous insulin injections have a great difficulty in controlling their glycaemia without risk of significant hyperglycaemia, hypoglycaemia or hyperinsulinaemia. The results of the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT) have shown that stringent glycaemic control can significantly reduce the appearance of long-term complications such as nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease. Hypoglycaemia is unacceptable and dangerous, while hyperinsulinaemia is associated with a higher risk of atherosclerosis. This is discussed in a background paper, Clinical Science (1997) 92,321-330.
It has thus been clear for many years that there is a requirement for the development of new approaches to improving glycaemic control in diabetic patients. In combination with improved methods for self-monitoring of blood glucose concentrations, open-loop and closed-loop continuous insulin infusion devices have been developed to provide near-normal glycaemia. However, the use of these devices is compromised because: a) some are inappropriate for ambulatory patients; b) they are not fail-safe; c) they do not provide a lophysiological replacement of normal amounts of insulin; and d) they necessitate a high degree of motivation and extensive training on the part of the patient.
The ideal treatment for type I diabetes would be the replacement of the patient's destroyed &bgr;-cells with transplanted pancreatic Islets of Langerhans. However this approach has two major drawbacks: a) the patients have to be treated with immunosuppressants to prevent rejection of the transplanted islets; and b) it is dependent on the availability of tissue from human cadavers. In addition the ability to prepare pure islets from such donor tissue has proved problematic. Porcine Islets have been suggested as a convenient alternative. However, problems have arisen as a result of the purity of porcine Islet preparations, tissue availability, storage, and transplant rejection.
An alternative approach to treatment, which might improve the control of circulating glucose concentrations, is the implantation of cells which have been genetically modified in vitro to express insulin. Accordingly, cultured cell lines might be manipulated to express insulin by DNA-mediated gene transfer, and the cells encapsulated and implanted into the patient. Several approaches have been adopted:
1) Engineering &bgr;-cell lines: a number of rodent or hamster &bgr;-cell lines are in use. These have been generated by X-ray irradiation of isolated Islets of Langerhans, transformation of isolated Islets of Langerhans by DNA tumour viruses, expression of the SV40 large T antigen in &bgr;-cells of transgenic mice or by cell fusion of Islets of Langerhans with immortalized cell lines. The problem with these cell lines is that they tend to dedifferentiate after a period of time in continuous culture. This results in a loss of glucose sensitive insulin secretion from the physiological range (4-10 mM) to a sub millimolar range. Also, because these cells are highly proliferative it is difficult to predict (based on animal studies) the levels of insulin secreted when implanted into diabetic patients i.e. as the cells proliferate within the animals the insulin levels become too high and the animals become hypoglycaemic.
2) Engineering non-&bgr; neuroendocrine cells. Cells such as the mouse corticotrophic cell line AtT20 can be stably transfected with insulin. However, although these AtT20ins cells efficiently process proinsulin to insulin, they do not secrete insulin in response to glucose. Attempts to make AtT20ins cells glucose responsive by transfecting with the glucose transporter GLUT-2 (to generate AtT20insGLUT-2 cells) have been unsuccessful—the cells show some response to glucose but in the sub-physiological range. A major problem with the use of neuroendocrine cells is that endogenous neuropeptides or hormones (e.g. ACTH) that are co-secreted with insulin may antagonise the effects of insulin or otherwise upset the metabolic balance of the patient. Thus we have shown that although some degree of glycaemic control can be achieved by implanting AtT20ins or AtT20insGLUT-2 cells in diabetic animals, after a period of time hyperglycaemia occurs because the animals have become insulin resistant as a consequence of the elevated ACTH levels secreted by the implanted cells.
3) Engineering non-neuroendocrine cells. Muscle, liver and fibroblast cells have been used to administer insulin. The problem with these cells is they do not have the capacity to process proinsulin to insulin or to sense changes in circulating glucose levels. The first problem has been overcome by mutating the proinsulin cleavage sites to the recognition sequence for the ubiquitously expressed protease furin. The second problem regarding engineering glucose sensitive insulin secretion in non-neuroendocrine cells may be beyond the scope of present technologies and knowledge. However, a constitutive trickle release of insulin from these cells may have therapeutic value under certain circumstances.
4) The final approach is to engineer primary cells taken from diabetic patients. These cells would be of non-neuroendocrine origin, i.e. muscle or fibroblast. The aim would be to attain a stable trickle release of insulin using the mutant proinsulin molecule engineered for cleavage by furin.
Despite progress in the above areas no-one to date has engineered or cloned a cell line which grows well in culture and which secretes insulin in response to changes in glucose concentration in the physiological range. Such a human pancreatic &bgr;-cell line has long been sought. We have now succeeded in generating a number of such cell lines using a novel approach based on engineered &bgr;-like cells inter alia isolated from patients with persistent hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia of infancy PHHI (also known as nesidioblastosis, nesidioplasia of the pancreas, persistent neonatal hyperinsulinism, congenital hyperinsulinism, familial hyperinsulinism (with hypoglycaemia), persistent infantile hyperinsulinism, hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia, microadenomatosis, islet cell hyperplasia, focal hyperinulinism, diffuse hyperinsulism, glucokinase upregulation disorder, glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase disorder, syndrome of hyperinsulinism and hyperammonemia, insulinoma of childhood).
Although we have used cells derived from PHHI, it will be appreciated that immature cells from other sources or bio-engineered cell lines may be used so long as they give rise initially to immortalized unregulated insulin secretion. By the term immortalized is meant a cell line which proliferates in vitro in culture. Islet cells isolated from some patents with PHHI are ideal for producing a cell line because they spontaneously proliferate in vitro.
By cell line we include cell lines derived from cell lines of
Aynsley-Green Albert
Docherty Kevin
Dunne Mark
James Roger Frank Lever
Lindley Keith
Aberdeen University
Ketter James
Licata & Tyrrell P.C.
Schnizer Richard
LandOfFree
Glucose responsive &bgr;-cell line does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Glucose responsive &bgr;-cell line, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Glucose responsive &bgr;-cell line will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2924096