Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
2007-05-22
2007-05-22
Mizrahi, Diane (Department: 2165)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
active
10632000
ABSTRACT:
An analyzer/classifier/synthesizer/prioritizing tool for data comprises use of an admissible geometrization process with data transformed and partitioned by an input process into one or more input matrices and one or more partition classes and one or more scale groups. The data to be analyzed/classified/synthesized/prioritized is processed by an admissible geometrization technique such as 2-partition modified individual differences multidimensional scaling (2p-IDMDS) to produce at least a measure of geometric fit. Using the measure of geometric fit and possibly other 2p-IDMDS output, a back end process analyzes, synthesizes, classifies, and prioritizes data through patterns, structure, and relations within the data.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5175710 (1992-12-01), Hutson
patent: 5181259 (1993-01-01), Rorvig
patent: 5235506 (1993-08-01), O'Brien, Jr.
patent: 5245587 (1993-09-01), Hutson
patent: 5321613 (1994-06-01), Porter et al.
patent: 5348020 (1994-09-01), Hutson
patent: 5402335 (1995-03-01), O'Brien
patent: 5422961 (1995-06-01), Simard
patent: 5437279 (1995-08-01), Gray
patent: 5490516 (1996-02-01), Hutson
patent: 5574837 (1996-11-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5579766 (1996-12-01), Gray
patent: 5596644 (1997-01-01), Abel et al.
patent: 5602938 (1997-02-01), Akiyama et al.
patent: 5625767 (1997-04-01), Bartell et al.
patent: 5706402 (1998-01-01), Bell
patent: 5729451 (1998-03-01), Gibbs et al.
patent: 5802207 (1998-09-01), Huang
patent: 5987094 (1999-11-01), Clark et al.
patent: 6332034 (2001-12-01), Makram-Ebeid et al.
patent: 6546117 (2003-04-01), Sun et al.
patent: 6606624 (2003-08-01), Goldberg
patent: 6684206 (2004-01-01), Chen et al.
patent: 6941287 (2005-09-01), Vaidyanathan et al.
patent: 2003/0189731 (2003-10-01), Chang
Baird, J. C., Selection from Fundamentals of Scaling and Psychophysics, Wiley, 1978, pp. 177-205.
Borg, I. and Groenen, P., Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 1997, pp. 15-27; 159-173.
Carroll, J. D. and Chang, J., “Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition,” Psychometrika, 35, 1970, pp. 283-319.
Commandeur, J. and Heiser, W., “Mathematical derivations in the proximity scaling (Proxscal) of symmetrical data matrices,” Tech. Report No. 99-93-03, Department of Data Theory, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1999.
Cunningham, J. P. and Shepard, R. N., “Monotone mapping for similarities into a general metric space,” J. Math. Psychol., 11, 1974, 335-363.
De Leeuw, J. and Heiser, W., “Theory of multidimensional scaling,” in P. R. Krishnaiah and L. N. Kanal, Eds., Handbook of Statistics, vol. 2. North-Holland, New York, 1982, pp. 285-316.
Fang, W., “Disagreement degree of multi-person judgements in an additive structure,” Mathematical Social Sciences, 28, 1994, pp. 85-111.
Gifi, A., “Algorithm descriptions for Anacor, Homals, Princals, and Overals,” Tech. Report No. RR-89-01, Department of Data Theory, University of Leiden, 1989.
Goodhill, G. J. et al., “An evaluation of the use of multidimensional scaling for understanding brain connectivity,” Research Paper EUCCS/RP-63, University of Edinburgh, 1994, 1994, pp. 1-23.
Kendall, G. D., “Seriation,” in Hodson et al., Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, 1970, pp. 215-251.
Lingoes, J. C. et al., Geometric Representations of Relational Data, Mathesis Press, Ann Arbor, 1979, pp. 313-317, 529-539, 791-815.
McGee, V. E., “The multidimensional analysis of ‘elastic’ distances,” The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 1966, 181-196.
McGee, V. E., “Multidimensional scaling of n sets of similarity measures: a nonmetric individual differences approach,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1968, pp. 233-249.
Mielke, P. W. and Berry, K. J., Permutation Methods: A Distance Function Approach, Springer, New York, 2001, pp. 32-36.
Narens, L., Theories of Meaningfulness. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2002, pp. 45-56.
Osborne, D. K., “Further extensions of a theorem of dimensional analysis,” J. Math. Psychol., 7, 1970, pp. 236-242.
Ovchinnikov, S., “Means of ordered sets,” Math. Social Sci., 32, 1996, pp. 39-56.
Roberts, F. S., “Limitations on conclusions using scales of measurements,” in S. M. Pollock et al., Eds., Handbooks in OR & MS, vol. 6, Elsevier, New York, 1994, pp. 621-669.
Saaty, T. L., Selections from The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting and Resource Allocation, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1990, pp. a19-a24.
Schiffman, S. S. et al., Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling, Academic Press, 1981, pp. 74-82, 321-333.
Siegel, S. and Castellan, J., “Nonparametric statistics for the social sciences,” 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1988, pp. 22-36.
Sinha, D. et al, “A general class of aggregation operators with applications to information fusion in distributed systems,” 1989 IEEE Intel Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, (PROC), 1989, pp. 921-927.
Stevens, S. S., “On the theory of scales of measurement,” Science, 103, 1946, pp. 677-680.
Takane, Y. et al., “Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features,” Pyschometrika, 42, 1977, pp. 7-67.
Wish, M. and Carroll, J. D., “Multidimensional scaling and its applications,” in P. R. Krishnaiah and L. N. Kanal, Eds., Handbook of Statistics, vol. 2. North-Holland, pp. 317-345.
Young, M. “The organization of neural systems in the primate cerebral cortex,” Biological Sciences, 252, 1993, pp. 13-18.
Zhou et al., “A linearly constrained least squares approach for multisensor data fusion,” SPIE, 3067, 1997, pp. 118-129.
Perreault, W. D. and Young, F. W., “Alternating least squares optimal scaling: analysis of nonmetric data in marketing research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 1980, 1-13.
Marger & Johnson & McCollom, P.C.
Mizrahi Diane
LandOfFree
Geometrization for pattern recognition, data analysis, data... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Geometrization for pattern recognition, data analysis, data..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Geometrization for pattern recognition, data analysis, data... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3813777